Attachment_9_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 292 KB Posted

Attached to
Senator Wash - SCADA Upgrade Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140R3022R0001
Issued by
Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation

About this file

This document contains a pre-solicitation notice and description for an upcoming federal contract opportunity with the Bureau of Reclamation within the Department of the Interior. The solicitation will be for upgrading the Senator Wash Pump Generating Plant, including removal and replacement of motor protective relays, installation of a permanent engine-generator set, distribution panelboards, and integration of pump-generation unit control with a contractor-provided SCADA system. The period of performance is 365 days beginning around April 1, 2022. The estimated price range for the construction project is between $1-5 million. A pre-proposal site visit will be scheduled and further instruction will be included in the solicitation to be issued around January 10, 2022, with proposals due 30 days thereafter. The NAICS code is 238210 and the contract type will be firm-fixed price. Bid, payment and performance bonds are required, and the single point of contact is Virginia Toledo at the provided email.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOLICITATION NO: 140R3022R0001

ATTACHMENT 9

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

SOLICITATION NO: 140R3022R0001

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Attachment 9

RFP 140R03022R0001

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED

***NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS***

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Lower Colorado Basin, is considering the firm listed below. Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance.

Past Performance Information:

Name and Address of Firm Being Evaluated:______________________________________

Contract No.:__________________ Type of Contract: _____________________ Project Title:___________________ Date of Award:_________________ Completion Date: _____________________ Location:______________________ Initial Amount:__________________ Final Amount: ________________________ Description:_________________________________________________________________

Evaluator: (The following information will assist in the analysis of the data.)

Name of Evaluator: ______________________________________

Company/Agency Name: ______________________________________

Address: ______________________________________

Phone Number: ______________________________________

Email Address: ______________________________________

Position Held or Function in Relation to Project: ______________________________________

Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.

“O” Outstanding Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements.

“A” Above Average Performance exceeded the contract requirements.

“S” Satisfactory Performance met the contract requirements.

“M” Marginal Performance met the minimum contract requirements but

Some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.

“U” Unacceptable Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.

Attachment 9

RFP 140R03022R0001

Please circle the appropriate rating and provide any supporting information/comments for the following:

1. The relationship between the firm and client’s/customer’s contract team: O A S M U

2. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness and cooperative conduct: O A S M U

3. Quality control: O A S M U

4. Ability to meet the performance schedule: O A S M U

5. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain: Yes No

6. Would you award another contract to the firm being evaluated? If no, please explain: Yes No

7. Was the customer satisfied with the end product and services? If no, please explain:

Yes No

8. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results? Yes No

9. Additional Remarks:

10. Overall rating for this firm: O A S M U

Print Name

Signature of Evaluator Date

The questionnaire should be submitted via email to vtoledo@usbr.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .