Attachment 8_Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 132 KB Posted

Attached to
Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Minor Construction Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911KF21R0277
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a solicitation for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Minor Construction. The past performance questionnaire relates to solicitation number W911KF-21-R-0277 and is to be completed by a contractor's references to provide feedback on quality, schedule, certification compliance, and overall performance on prior contracts. The solicitation seeks a contractor to perform minor construction tasks through the issuance of task orders by Anniston Army Depot over the contract period. A site visit is scheduled for July 6, 2021, with questions due by July 1st. Responses to the solicitation are due by August 6, 2021. The contractor will be expected to provide all labor, materials, and equipment, except when government furnished, to repair, alter, or construct facilities at Anniston Army Depot in Alabama.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Minor Construction, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment W911KF-21-R-0277-0002 released.pdf PDF
Amendment W911KF21R0277-0001.pdf PDF
W911KF21R0277 Released.pdf PDF
Attachment 7_Wage Determination AL20210149.pdf PDF
Attachment 6_Wage Determination AL20210105.pdf PDF
Attachment 1_Performance Work Statement_ANAD SATOC.pdf PDF
Attachment 10_Past Performance Evaluation Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment 2_Evidence of Authority to Sign Offers.pdf PDF
Attachment 4_Contractor Request for Waiver Non-EPA Guideline Items.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Use of Existing Government-Furnished Property.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 3_EPA Guideline Items.pdf PDF
Attachment 5_Wage Determination AL20210084.pdf PDF
Attachment 11_Technical Factor Evaluation Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment 9_Pricing Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire

This Questionnaire relates to a solicitation for _W911KF-21-R-0277_.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail or send by facsimile Army Contracting Command – ANAD (DTA) Anniston Army Depot 7 Frankford Ave.

Anniston, AL 36201-4199

ATTN: Sara B. Young;

sara.b.young.civ@mail.mil

Desired Response Date:

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO.:

3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

4. COMPLETION DATE:

5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options): $

6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:

Please provide a copy of the complete Performance Work Statement or Scope of Work for each of the evaluated contract.

Please add a continuation page if additional space necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE

8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:

b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER:

c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Please circle the response code for each topic (A –G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.

SUB = Substantial Confidence SAT = Satisfactory Confidence N = Neutral Confidence L = Limited Confidence NO = No Confidence

Please provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned; address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution.

Use additional pages as needed.

A. Quality – Assess the contractor’s ability to staff the contract with a dedicated Site Manager, a dedicated Project Manager and a dedicated Quality Control Manager.

SUB SAT N L NO

Narrative (A): Quality – Assess the contractor’s ability to staff the contract with a dedicated Site Manager, a dedicated Project Manager and a dedicated Quality Control Manager:

B. Quality – Assess contractor’s ability to manage multiple projects simultaneously.

Narrative (B): Quality – Assess contractor’s ability to manage multiple projects simultaneously:

C. Quality – Assess contractor’s ability to manage the performance of their employees and subcontractors.

Narrative (C): Quality – Assess contractor’s ability to manage the performance of their employees and subcontractors:

D. Quality - Assess contractor’s ability to deliver quality work that meets all of the contract requirements.

Narrative (D): Quality - Assess contractor’s ability to deliver quality work that meets all of the contract requirements:

E. Schedule – Assess contractor’s ability to meet the contract period of performance with few or no extensions.

Narrative (E): Schedule – Assess contractor’s ability to meet the contract period of performance with few or no extensions:

F. Certification Compliance – Assess the contractor’s ability to meet all Federal, State, and Local certification requirements:

SUB SAT N L NO

Narrative (F): Certification Compliance – Assess the contractor’s ability to meet all Federal, State, and Local certification requirements:

G. Overall Assessment –

Narrative (G): Overall Assessment:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .