Attachment 11_Technical Factor Evaluation Matrix.pdf
PDF 74 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Minor Construction Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911KF21R0277
About this file
This document provides an evaluation matrix and risk assessment scale for a solicitation seeking an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) for Minor Construction services at Anniston Army Depot in Anniston, Alabama. The contractor will provide all labor, materials, equipment, and facilities, except when specified as government furnished, to repair, alter, or construct real property facilities and structures upon receipt of task orders issued during the contract period. A site visit is scheduled for July 6, 2021, and questions must be submitted in writing by July 1, 2021. The solicitation number is W911KF21R0277 and is being issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal. Evaluation criteria include outstanding, good, acceptable, marginal, and unacceptable ratings defined by approach, understanding, strengths, and risk levels.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment W911KF-21-R-0277-0002 released.pdf | ||
| Amendment W911KF21R0277-0001.pdf | ||
| W911KF21R0277 Released.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7_Wage Determination AL20210149.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6_Wage Determination AL20210105.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4_Contractor Request for Waiver Non-EPA Guideline Items.pdf | ||
| Attachment 12 - Use of Existing Government-Furnished Property.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3_EPA Guideline Items.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1_Performance Work Statement_ANAD SATOC.pdf | ||
| Attachment 10_Past Performance Evaluation Matrix.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2_Evidence of Authority to Sign Offers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8_Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5_Wage Determination AL20210084.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9_Pricing Workbook.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Combined Technical/Risk Adjectival Scale for Technical Factor
Evaluators will apply the adjectival rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.
Evaluation Criteria Adjectival Rating Definition
Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
Acceptable
Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.
In accordance with the DoD Source Selection Procedures, below are the descriptions of risk levels identified in the combined Technical/Risk Adjectival Scale above:
Risk Level Description Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance.
Normal contractor effort and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.
Moderate Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.
High Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.
Unacceptable Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .