Attachment 8 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

Solicitation #: 1305M222QNWWG0007

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________

(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)

ORGANIZATION: ___________________________

CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR NAME: __________________________

DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED:

SEND COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO: Shakir.Shinaba@noaa.gov DEADLINE: See RFQ for required submission dates

QUESTIONNAIRES MUST BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO CONTRACT SPECIALIST, SHAKIR SHINABA, BY THE RATER LISTED ON PAGE 6 OR THEY WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards). For ratings other than satisfactory, comments are required to justify the rating in how the contractor either exceeded contractual requirements or did not meet contractual requirements. If ratings other than satisfactory are marked but no comments to justify the ratings are provided, a satisfactory rating will be assumed.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance). For ratings other than satisfactory, comments are required to justify the rating in how the contractor either exceeded contractual requirements or did not meet contractual requirements. If ratings other than satisfactory are marked but no comments to justify the ratings are provided, a satisfactory rating will be assumed.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. COST CONTROL

Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost. For ratings other than satisfactory, comments are required to justify the rating in how the contractor either exceeded contractual requirements or did not meet contractual requirements. If ratings other than satisfactory are marked but no comments to justify the ratings are provided, a satisfactory rating will be assumed.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction. For ratings other than satisfactory, comments are required to justify the rating in how the contractor either exceeded contractual requirements or did not meet contractual requirements. If ratings other than satisfactory are marked but no comments to justify the ratings are provided, a satisfactory rating will be assumed.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Organization: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Shakir.Shinaba@noaa.gov no later the time and date provided in the RFQ.

Source Selection Information