Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 42 KB Posted

Attached to
Multi - AOR Armed Guard Transportation Services
Solicitation number
70CDCR26R00000018_S
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for reference evaluations related to DHS Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) solicitation 70CDCR26R00000018 for armed guard transportation services. The questionnaire is to be completed by past clients or contracting officers who have worked with an offeror and submitted directly to Contracting Officer Natalie Carr and Contract Specialist Ronald Robinson by August 3, 2026. The form uses a five-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory) to assess contractor performance across multiple dimensions including quality of services, schedule compliance, key personnel management, staffing adequacy, and responsiveness to corrective action needs.

The questionnaire evaluates contractor strengths and weaknesses, compliance with subcontracting plan goals for small disadvantaged businesses, history of contract terminations for default or convenience, and overall likelihood of future contract award. Respondents provide narrative comments supporting each rating and identify specific performance issues such as staffing shortages, failure to meet delivery schedules, or inability to resolve performance problems independently. This evaluation tool directly supports ICE's assessment of offerors' capabilities for the multi-area armed guard transportation services IDIQ contract covering the Baltimore, Boston, Newark, New York, and Washington Areas of Responsibility.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A0005_Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
A0005_70CDCR26R00000018 - RFP.pdf PDF
A0004_70CDCR26R00000018 - RFP.pdf PDF
A0003_7e - WAS Trans Route.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0003_70CDCR26R00000018 - RFP.pdf PDF
A0001_Q and_A.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0002_70CDCR26R00000018 - RFP.pdf PDF
A0001 6d-NYC Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0001_7a - BAL Trans Route.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0001_7b - BOS Trans Route.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0001 6b-BOS Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0001 6e-WAS Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0001_70CDCR26R00000018 - RFP.pdf PDF
A0001_Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
A0001 6c-NEW Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0001_Attachment 10 - Seniority List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0001 6a-BAL Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6b -BOS Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6c -NEW Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6d -NYC Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7a - BAL Trans Route.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7b - BOS Trans Route.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7d - NYC Trans Route.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7e - WAS Trans Route.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
Attachment 5b - Wage Determination_BOS.pdf PDF
Attachment 5e - Wage Determination_WAS.pdf PDF
Attachment 6e -WAS Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7c - NEW Trans Route.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 9 - Demonstrated Experience (Factor 1).docx DOCX document
70CDCR26R00000018 - RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment 5a - Wage Determination_BAL.pdf PDF
Attachment 5c - Wage Determination_NEW.pdf PDF
Attachment 6a -BAL Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - G391.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4 - ASSET PROTECTION NJ ICE CBA.pdf PDF
Attachment 5d - Wage Determination_NYC.pdf PDF
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOLICITATION: 70CDCR26R00000018

Attachment 8

US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS

[Offeror] is proposing on a U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) request to establish an IDIQ for armed guard transportation services in support of the Baltimore, Boston, Newark, New York and Washington Area of Responsibility (AOR)’s. [Offeror] has provided ICE with your contact information as a reference for their Past Performance. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important. The information contained in this Past Performance Questionnaire is to be provided directly to Natalie Carr, Contracting Officer (CO) at Natalie.Carr@ice.dhs.gov and Ronald Robinson, Contract Specialist (CS) at Ronald.Robinson@ice.dhs.gov. This information will not be disclosed to the respondent. Please provide an honest assessment of the vendors performance and return this questionnaire to ICE no later than Monday, August 3, 2026 email to the CO and CS. If you have any questions, please contact Natalie Carr or Ronald Robinson.

Please utilize the following rating system during the completion of this questionnaire:

Code
Rating
Description
E
Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements). The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contract were highly effective.
VG
Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements). The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which correcting actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions, or the contractors proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractors corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
NA
Not Applicable
Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION

Respondent’s Name:

Respondent’s Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Value:

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance:

Contract Type (Fixed Price, Time and Materials, etc.):

PART THREE: ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS

Place an “X” in the appropriate box next to the letter for each item on the questionnaire. Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a supporting narrative for each area. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.

1. Rate the contractor’s Quality of Services provided:

E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|

Comments for Question 1:

2. Rate the contractor’s success in meeting Contract Schedules (qualified staffing, delivery of reports, performance of services):

E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|

Comments for Question 2:

3. Rate the contractor’s management of Key Personnel:

E |_| V |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| N |_|

Comments for Question 3:

4. Have you experienced any problems with the contractor’s failure to fully staff required positions?

YES |_| NO |_|

5. Did the contractor take reasonable actions to correct the staffing shortages? Was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from counterparts?

YES |_| NO |_|

Comments for Question 5:

6. Please identify what you believe the contractor’s strengths to be.

7. Please identify what you believe the contractor’s weaknesses to be.

8. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

YES |_| NO |_| DEFAULT |_| CONVENIENCE |_|

If yes, explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

9. Did the contractor comply with subcontracting plan goals for small disadvantaged business (SDB) concerns?

YES |_| NO |_|

Comments for Question 9:

10. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?

YES |_| NO |_|

11. Explain why you would not enter into another contract with this company.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .