Attachment 8 Past Performance.docx

RFP 15JPSS22R00000040

AFMS AFISS2

Attachment 8: Optional Past Performance Form

INSTRUCTIONS--CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

1) The solicitation requests that all past performance information submitted to be evaluated for RFP 15JPSS22R00000040 be entered into the CPAR system for the Contracting Officer to review in response to the solicitation.

2) Offerors can also provide an attachment of a CPAR record in final status for consideration of any past performance information. Final status refers to the individual report specific to draft status or final status. Interim reports for a contract or order with multiple ordering periods is acceptable.

3) The final option would be offerors to submit the completed form below with their response to the solicitation. The completed form must be signed by the contracting official for the past performance reference that is submitted. Offerors that submit this form to document past performance should not count this document towards any page limitation in accordance with RFP instructions. Any past performance information in the CPAR system will be considered before the information provided in item 1 and 2 is evaluated for any past performance record provided in support of evaluation of RFP 15JPSS22R00000040.

4) The form can be signed and submitted by the COR or the CO of the referenced contract or task order number. The description must be complete. A rating must be provided with a narrative that supports the rating. The recommendation should also be completed by the COR or CO for the contract provided to support past performance. All ratings shall follow the Federal Acquisition Regulation guidance for contract performance assessment ratings or they may not be considered in the evaluation of past performance for the offeror.

DESCRPITON OF CONTRACT

Contractor Name:

Contract/BPA Number:

Task/Delivery Order Number(s):

Project/Program Title:

Description of Requirement:

Contracting Officer:

RATINGS AND NARRATIVE

Insert an adjectival rating for each applicable primary assessment area [Quality, Schedule, Cost, Management, and Regulatory Compliance] and supporting factual narrative using the tables below. The adjectival rating scale [Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal or Unsatisfactory] and additional guidance on completing the assessment are contained in the Instructions section. A narrative is required regardless of the rating given, e.g., even a rating of “satisfactory” requires narrative support.

Quality of Product or Service

Schedule

Cost Control

Management

Regulatory Compliance

RECOMMENDATION

Complete the statement in the shaded area below by selecting the one choice that best reflects your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance. Place an “X” in the box next to your choice.

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with this contract or order's most significant requirements, I ('would' or 'would not') recommend them for similar requirements in the future.

… would …

… would not …

CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE OR CONTRACTING OFFICER

The name, job title, contract role (e.g., Contracting Officer’s Representative), email address and telephone number of the individual completing this assessment and the date it was completed and sent to the Contracting Officer.

Name:

Job Title:

Contract Role:

E-mail Address:

Telephone No.:

Date Completed: