RFP Questions Amendment 6.pdf

PDF 135 KB Posted

Attached to
Asset Forfeiture Investigation Services (AFISS 2)
Solicitation number
15JPSS22R00000040
Issued by

About this file

This document contains questions and answers regarding Amendment 6 to Request for Proposal 15JPSS22R00000040 issued by the Department of Justice for Asset Forfeiture Investigation Services (AFISS 2).

The Department of Justice requires investigative, legal, analytical, and technical support services to support its Asset Forfeiture Program operations and management. Questions were asked regarding page limits, past performance evaluations, security clearance requirements, and labor categories. Clarification was provided that no resume is needed for the Cryptocurrency Subject Matter Expert position, continuation pages are acceptable for acknowledging amendments, and the RFP requirement for a Top Secret facility clearance applies only to the prime offeror. An updated SF-33 cover page with the correct due date will be issued.

View the file

Other files

Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP No. RFP 15JPSS22R00000040

AFMS AFISS2

Amendment No. 6 No. Page No. Section and

Paragraph # or Attachment

Question/Comment Recommended Change or Supplemental Information Requested

Response

1 76 L.3.3.5 There is no page allocation for this section and there is only one page unaccounted for in the page count of

70. The information required will take up more than one page.

Please provide a page count for this section.

2 77 Question 17 This question was not answered in Amendment 4.

Does the government expect offerors to provide CPARs or will the government review CPARs within the

CPARS

system?

The Government expects to review in CPARS as stated in the RFP.

Alternatively, either Past performance questionnaire maybe provided if a past performance contract is not available in

CPARS.

3 C.6.2.c, L.3.3.b, M.2.1.b

Nowhere in the latest

RFP

(Amendment 4) does it specifically say a resume is required for the Cryptocurrency

SME.

Please clarify whether a resume for this position is a requirement.

No resume is required.

4 Cover Page SF 33 The Standard Form Cover Page was not updated with the new due date and time.

Does the Government intend to release an updated SF 33?

Recommend that an updated SF 33 citing the correct due date/time be included.

Yes, it is attached to Amendment 6.

5 Cover Page SF 33 Per sec. 14, the Amendment No and the date of receipt are to be acknowledged and there are only 4 spaces, while we are at Amendment 5.

Will a continuation page be considered so we may acknowledge current or future Amendments?

Recommend that continuation pages be allowed so Offerors may acknowledge amendments past the 4 allocated spaces.

All offerors shall acknowledge all amendments. A continuation page is acceptable.

Amendment No. 6 6 Amendment

RFP Page & Q&A

L.3.3.5 Paragraph 1 of the RFP & Question 94 of Amendment 4 Q&A

In L.3.3.5, the RFP states, "A Top Secret Facility Clearance issued by DSS will be required to fully perform this contract.

Offerors must demonstrate an understanding of this requirement and the ability to comply with the clearances issued by DSS. Offerors shall either submit evidence of clearance or a plan (including timelines) for obtaining clearance.

Notice is hereby given that the apparent successful Offeror shall have this TOP SECRET facility clearance no later than the time of proposal submission;

otherwise, it will not be eligible for award".

This statement refers only to the OFFEROR, which is very common.

However, in the Q&A, the question is asked, "Does the DOJ require the prime offeror and all subcontractors to have a TS FCL at the time of submission?"

The Government responded with "Yes, for all proposed Prime and subcontractors."

Would the Government consider applying the TS/FCL requirement to only the Offeror and major subcontractors?

The requirement for the entire team to have a TS/FCL would seem to be appropriate only at

Suggest that the Government have the RFP + Amendment 4, Sec. L.3.3.5 requirement referring to only the

OFFEROR

supersede the Q&A and strike the response to question 94.

Amendment No. 6 the Task Order level, depending on the requesting agency's needs. Several of the agencies listed in C.5, AFP Participating Agencies, require only Secret and/or Public Trust clearances for the FTEs involved.

Furthermore, the RFQ states in Section C.6.2 (b), Staffing, "Contractor personnel shall be required to have Top Secret-SCI, Top Secret, Secret, and Public Trust clearances based on order."

Finally, in additional guidance provided by the RFQ documents, only 50% of the FTEs currently on the contract or to be provided by the new IDIQ have/are required to have a Top Secret clearance.

Will the Government confirm that the RFP + Amendment 4, Sec.

L.3.3.5 supersedes Question 94?

7 Amendment 4 RFP Page

C.8.1.3 (p) The tasks and services required to be performed in this category shall be performed by Computer Forensics Examiner (CFE)/Computer Forensics Examiner

(CFE)

We request the Government clarify if this is a duplicate error or if the services in this section are performed by Computer Forensics Examiner (CFE) and one other Labor Category.

Second Labor Category, if applicable

Amendment No. 6

8 Cover Page SF 33 The Standard Form Cover Page was not updated with the new due date and time.

Does the Government intend to release an updated SF 33?

Recommend that an updated SF 33 citing the correct due date/time be included.

Please see the response to question

no. 4.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .