Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire Amendment 4.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 15JPSS22R00000040
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for contractors bidding on the Asset Forfeiture Investigation Services (AFISS 2) solicitation. The Department of Justice requires the contractor to provide specific case-related professional and technical services to support the Asset Forfeiture Program, including investigative, legal, analytical, and technical support. The past performance questionnaire asks references to evaluate the contractor's performance on a previous contract across quality, schedule, cost control, business relationships, and key personnel on a scale of exceptional to poor. It includes prompts for a narrative explanation to support each rating. Interested offerors for the AFISS 2 solicitation must provide any questions and submit proposals by the dates stated in the attached request for proposals.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Name of Contractor submitting proposal: ______________________________
Please have references complete the following questionnaire and return it, via email, to the attention of the individuals named below, no later than the RFP close date and time.
Velvette Clayton, Contract Officer at PSS.RFPJMD@usdoj.gov
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
DELIVERY ORDER NO.:
GOVERNMENT CONTRACTUAL REPRESENTATIVE:
Name (print) Phone
| Contractor Role: | |
| Prime | Subcontractor |
| Contract Type: | ||
| Competitive | Sole Source | |
| IDIQ Task Order | Other Fixed Price or Fixed Unit Price |
Time & Materials or Cost Reimbursement
| Work Complexity: | |
| Difficult | Routine |
| Past performance Organization Type: | ||
| Local /County | Commercial | |
| State | National |
Please indicate your assessment ranging from “1 (Poor)” to “5 (Exceptional)” in the boxes provided below along with a NARRATIVE EXPLANATION to support the rating (each cell will adjust for narrative comments) Or you can use the additional narrative space on the last page to clearly identify the area that you are rating and any additional narrative to support the rating:
EXCEPTIONAL
(5)
VERY GOOD
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
MARGINAL
(2)
POOR
(1)
1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:
(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship
(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.
(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
2. SCHEDULE:
(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.
(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
3. COST CONTROL:
(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
(c) The contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
EXCEPTIONAL
(5)
VERY GOOD
(4)
SATISFACTORY
(3)
MARGINAL
(2)
POOR
(1)
4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:
(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(f) The Contractor made timely award to and demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors.
5. KEY PERSONNEL:
(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.
(b) The Contractor frequently proposed highly qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.
RFP 15JPSS22R00000040
AFMS AFISS2
Attachment 8: Optional Past Performance Form
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Attach additional NARRATIVE EXPLANATION pages is necessary
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .