Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire Amendment 4.pdf

PDF 126 KB Posted

Attached to
Asset Forfeiture Investigation Services (AFISS 2)
Solicitation number
15JPSS22R00000040
Issued by

About this file

This document includes an optional past performance questionnaire for contractors submitting proposals in response to solicitation number 15JPSS22R00000040 from the Department of Justice for Asset Forfeiture Investigation Services (AFISS 2). The questionnaire is to be completed by references for the contractor and addresses criteria including quality of product or service, schedule, cost control, and business relationships. Contractors are also evaluated on key personnel factors such as labor turnover and qualification of proposed staff. Responses are rated on a scale of exceptional to poor with narrative explanations required. Additional pages may be attached as needed.

View the file

Other files

Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP 15JPSS22R00000040

AFMS AFISS2

Attachment 8: Optional Past Performance Form

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Name of Contractor submitting proposal: ______________________________

Please have references complete the following questionnaire and return it, via email, to the attention of the individuals named below, no later than the RFP close date and time.

Velvette Clayton, Contract Officer at PSS.RFPJMD@usdoj.gov

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTUAL REPRESENTATIVE:

Name (print) Phone

Contractor Role: Prime Subcontractor

Contract Type: Competitive Sole Source IDIQ Task Order Other Fixed Price or Fixed Unit Price Time & Materials or Cost Reimbursement

Work Complexity: Difficult Routine

Past performance Organization Type:

Local /County Commercial State National

Please indicate your assessment ranging from “1 (Poor)” to “5 (Exceptional)” in the boxes provided below along with a NARRATIVE EXPLANATION to support the rating (each cell will adjust for narrative comments) Or you can use the additional narrative space on the last page to clearly identify the area that you are rating and any additional narrative to support the rating:

EXCEPTIONAL

(5)

VERY

GOOD

(4)

SATISFACTORY

(3)

MARGINAL

(2)

POOR

(1)

1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE:

(a) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(c) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

2. SCHEDULE:

(a) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(b) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

3. COST CONTROL:

(a) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(b) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(c) The contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

EXCEPTIONAL

(5)

VERY

GOOD

(4)

SATISFACTORY

(3)

MARGINAL

(2)

POOR

(1)

4. BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(a) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(b) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or Technical Point of Contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(c) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(d) The Contractor promptly notified the Contracting Officer’s Representative, Technical Point of Contact, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(e) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(f) The Contractor made timely award to and demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors.

5. KEY PERSONNEL:

(a) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(b) The Contractor frequently proposed highly qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Attach additional NARRATIVE EXPLANATION pages is necessary

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .