Attachment 8 - Factor 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 238 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Modular/Pre-Fabricated SCIF Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912DY21R0063
About this file
This solicitation is seeking proposals for a modular/prefabricated secured compartmented information facility (SCIF) to be constructed at Fort Shafter, Hawaii. The Army Corps of Engineers is soliciting the work as a total small business set-aside on a firm fixed price contract. Interested vendors must submit a statement of affiliation and meet security requirements to receive controlled unclassified information attachments from the DoD SAFE site describing the project in more detail. Proposals are due by the closing date listed in the solicitation. Vendors must allow sufficient time for the Army Corps of Engineers to review statements of affiliation, as this process may take up to two weeks to complete. The statement of affiliation submission deadline has already passed, so interested vendors should submit their statements as soon as possible if they wish to have adequate time to review the full solicitation and submit a responsive proposal by the closing date.
The attached document also includes a past performance questionnaire to be completed by clients to provide feedback on previous similar work. It requests ratings on quality, schedule, customer satisfaction, management, and cost for a listed contract.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 03 to W912DY21R0063.pdf | ||
| Amendment 02_W912DY21R0063.pdf | ||
| Amendment 01 to RFP W912DY21R0063.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - Factor 1 Element 1 Specialized Experience (Word Version).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Affiliation (SoA).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 9 - QA Spreadsheet RFP W912DY21R0063.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Request for Proposal (RFP) W912DY21R0063.pdf | ||
| Attachment 10 - DBA Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Division 01 Specs.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - Factor 1 Element 1 Specialized Experience.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Factor 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS TO THE
GOVERNMENT’S POINT OF CONTACT, SAMUEL CURRY, VIA EMAIL AT
samuel.l.curry@usace.army.mil. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL
INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance
E VG S M U N
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .