Attachment 7 - Past Performance Survey.doc

DOC document 88 KB Posted

Attached to
Amendment 0005 Additional Clarification on Design/Build Underground Utilities Replacement & Parking Lot Refurbishment Project - Denver Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) - Longmont, CO - BIL Funded Project
Solicitation number
697DCK-24-R-00361
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document is a Past Performance Survey related to a Design/Build Underground Utilities Replacement and Parking Lot Refurbishment project for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in Longmont, Colorado. The survey is being collected as part of the solicitation process to assist the FAA in selecting a contractor for the project. The survey asks the rater to evaluate the contractor's past performance in areas such as cost management, schedule maintenance, compliance with requirements, project coordination, safety, communication, problem-solving, and overall customer satisfaction. The related federal contract opportunity is a small business set-aside solicitation under NAICS code 237110 for a project valued between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000. The key dates are a site visit the week of May 20, 2024, with questions due by June 5, 2024 and offers due by June 24, 2024.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
697DCK-24-R-00361 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 REV. 1 - Statement of Work.pdf PDF
697DCK-24-R-00361 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
RFO 697DCK-24-R-00361 Amendment 0002-Date corrections.pdf PDF
RFO 697DCK-24-R-00361 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Uniform BIL Data Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - REF FAA-STD-002H.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - REF Topographic Surveys.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - DB WD No. CO20240017 dated 2-23-2024.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - REF Drawings.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - REF Facility Condition Assessment.pdf PDF
RFO 697DCK-24-R-00361.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS

SOLICITATION NO. 697DCK-24-R-00361

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ACQUISITION ACTIVITY

Des Moines, WA The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a contractor to provide design and construction services for underground utilities replacement and parking lot refurbishment project at FAA’s Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) located in Longmont, Colorado. As part of the solicitation process, we are collecting past performance information on contractors and their key personnel. This information will be used to assist the FAA in the selection of a contractor to complete the project. You have been listed as a past performance reference.

Please rate each of the criteria according to the following scale:

1
0 – 25% of the time
Strongly Disagree
PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED RESPONSE TO:

Federal Aviation Administration

ATTN: Cindi Tjelde E-MAIL: cindi.tjelde@faa.gov

2
26 – 40% of the time
Disagree
3
41 – 55% of the time
Somewhat Disagree
4
56 – 70% of the time
Somewhat Agree
5
71 – 85% of the time
Agree
6
86 – 100% of the time
Strongly Agree

NA

No Knowledge of This Element

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

RATER’S Name & Title

RATER’S Organization / agency

RATER’S TEL NO.

RATER’S E-MAIL ADDRESS:

CONTRACTOR’S NAME & ADDRESS

PROJECT TITLE OR DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

CONTRACT VALUE (INCLUDING OPTIONS):

CONTRACT TYPE:

FORMCHECKBOX

FIXED PRICE

FORMCHECKBOX

COST + FEE

FORMCHECKBOX

COMPETITIVE

FORMCHECKBOX

NON-COMPETITIVE

FORMCHECKBOX

SET-ASIDE

FORMCHECKBOX

SEALED BID

FORMCHECKBOX

NEGOTIATED

FORMCHECKBOX

SEALED BID

FORMCHECKBOX

NEGOTIATED

CONTRACT AWARD & COMPLETION DATE:

PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENT
RATING
1
2
3
4
5
6
N/A

1.

Contractor was able to manage project cost (i.e., minimize change orders).

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

2.

Contractor was able to maintain project schedule (completed on time or early).

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

3.

Contractor followed customer’s rules and regulations (i.e., contract requirements, building codes, specific policy, etc.)

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

4.

Contractor was efficient in project coordination and scheduling of different trades.

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

5.

Contractor complied with all safety standards and/or requirements.

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

6.

Contractor communicated effectively with you (the customer) throughout the entire project.

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

7.

Contractor utilized problem-solving skills effectively when problems arose during the project work.

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

8.

Closeout process was smooth and contractor submitted all closeout documents (as-builts, warranties, O&Ms, promptly).

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

9. Overall customer satisfaction.
FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

FORMCHECKBOX

Comments or additional information:

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .