Attachment 6 PP Questionnaire(1).docx

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

RFP Attachment 6: Past Performance Questionnaire The Systems Development Directorate of the Air Force Technical Applications Center is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the Atmosphere and Space program. The anticipated contract will provide services to sustain and further develop the Atmosphere and Space (A&S) mission systems. The A&S mission systems are part of a virtualized network located at AFTAC, Patrick Air Force Base (PAFB), Florida and alternate locations. The systems consist of a development domain, test domain, and an operational (production) domain which supports storage, retrieval, and analysis of data. The MSS2 effort will require multiple scientific and software development/engineering disciplines for successful accomplishment.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 19 February 2021. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to thomas.armstrong.11@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Thomas S. Armstrong Procuring Contracting Officer AMIC Det 2 OL/PKA

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Demonstrated the ability to source personnel with unique or specialized knowledge and expertise needed for successful accomplishment of the effort in the face of changes in technology.

4. Demonstrated the ability to maintain and develop highly complex scientific software code, analytical tools, and databases.

5. Demonstrated the ability to transition legacy software code to more modern languages and architecture using the DevOps or DevSecOps method.

6. Demonstrated the ability to integrate new or modified data streams or algorithms from third party sources.

7. Demonstrated sound system software engineering and configuration control practices.

8. Demonstrated the ability to comply with information assurance and cyber security software requirements

9. Demonstrated the ability to build and maintain as integrated master schedule of software builds and its integral tasks to support timely delivery to operations.

10. Demonstrated effective system software risk mitigation/management capability.

11. Demonstrated effective problem solving.

12. Provided timely information to government on issues/concerns impacting contract performance.

13. Demonstrated ability to respond efficiently and effectively to contract modifications.

14. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

15. Provided accurate and complete invoices.

16. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

17. Met or exceeded small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan (if applicable).

18. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

19. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

20. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

NOTE: TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY

AMIC DET 2 OL/PKA

Attn: Mr. Thomas Armstrong Bldg 10989 1020 South Patrick Drive Patrick Air Force Base, Florida 32925

The completed questionnaires should be contained in a second envelope marked with the mailing address and the following legend:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

E-Mail to:

thomas.armstrong.11@us.af.mil For Official Use Only Page 7 of 7