Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) 17 Apr 23.docx
DOCX document 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DAF Geospatial Support and Services (GSS) 2. 0 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA800323R0003
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
Solicitation FA8003-23-R-0003 Attachment 6: Past Performance Questionnaire The 771 Enterprise Sourcing Squadron of the Air Force Installation Contracting Center (AFICC) is in the process of competitively selecting sources for Geospatial Support & Services (GS&S) 2.0 program. The GS&S 2.0 program is predominantly professional services. The program also includes tasks associated with USAF Geospatial Agency Program Management and/or Geospatial Program Office Operations Support; Requirements Elicitation (Collection, Development, Analysis, and Synthesis); Geospatial Strategic Support; Communications, Education, and Training Support; Geospatial Data; Geospatial Analysis and Data Presentation Support; Geospatial IT System Support and Management; System Assessment and Authorization; IT Portfolio Management Activities; Application Development, Modernization, and Sustainment; Helpdesk Services and Customer Support Services; and Surge/Contingency Support.
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offerors’ past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the Offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror’s performance on those contracts or work efforts.
Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 01 May 2023.
The offeror who has nominated you as a Point of Contact for this effort has completed Section 1 below. In order to provide a complete assessment, please complete Section 2 through Section 6 in the attached Past Performance Information Sheet.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to frank.batz@us.af.mil. Please call Frank Batz at 570-640-7193 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
Attachments:
1. Past Performance Questionnaire
Section 1: Contract Identification (completed by the Offeror)
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Unique Entity Identifier (UEI):
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Program Title:
F. Brief Program Description:
G. Period of Performance
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable):
H. Contract Dollar Value
1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):
I. Contract Included (Please select all that apply):
☐ Communication and Training ☐ Program Management ☐ Data and Technical Management ☐ Rapid Response ☐ Other: ________________
J. Description of work performed:
K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No
L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
Governmental Organization☐ Non-governmental Organization☐
C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
Section 4: Performance Information
In the table below, indicate whether the contractor performed the task on the subject contract and provide overall quality rating by placing an “X” in the appropriate block. The performance quality ratings are defined as follows:
Code Performance Quality Rating
| E | EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| V | VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| S | SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| M | MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| U | UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N/A | NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know. |
| Functional Area 1 – Communication and Training |
| Yes |
| No |
| Unknown |
A. Experience working with USAF offices for increased capability/program awareness.
B. Experience developing and/or maintaining communications materials such as capability and program brochures, white papers, and fact sheets.
C. Experience providing training on GPS/GIS equipment/software currently used by the AF.
D. Experience working with military Public Affairs (PA) offices for increased capability/program awareness.
E. Experience with event planning; including site selection analysis, preparing event approval documentation, coordinating event registration, coordinating the event management committee, assisting in development and deployment of event materials including the event schedule/agenda for attendees.
F. Experience with geospatial technology training onsite and virtual including training on equipment, hands on training with GIS software, geospatial data for 10+ students per class; customers/audience using curriculum or syllabus.
G. Experience working with commercial PR/PA/marketing offices for increased capability/program awareness.
H. 3+ years experience conducting technical training using a curriculum or syllabus
| How would you rate the contractor's overall quality on this contract for Functional Area 1? | ||||||
| E☐ | V☐ | S☐ | M☐ | U☐ | N/A☐ |
NARRATIVE REMARKS:
| Functional Area 2 – Program Management |
| Yes |
| No |
| Unknown |
A. Experience with enterprise architecture (integrating GIS solutions across an enterprise) adoption across multiple domains.
B. Experience with Geospatial strategic consulting for other Government Agencies including strategies, approaches, needs analysis studies, and feasibility studies for future capabilities.
C. Experience with on-site program management of a GeoBase program or installation geospatial information and services for a DoD entity.
D. Experience with non-government entity geospatial program office providing non-intelligence decision making support.
E. Experience with geospatial segment architectures.
F. Experience with Geospatial strategic consulting for non-government entities including strategies, approaches, needs analysis studies, and feasibility studies for future capabilities.
G. Experience with other Government Agencies (federal, state, local) geospatial program office providing non-intelligence decision making support.
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract for Functional Area 2? | ||||||
| E☐ | V☐ | S☐ | M☐ | U☐ | N/A☐ |
| Functional Area 3 – Data and Technical Management |
| Yes |
| No |
| Unknown |
A. Experience with Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment (SDSFIE).
B. Experience conducting work generated from AFI 17-140 "DAF Architecture Framework.”
C. Demonstrated Experience with DOTmLPF-P; solving problems using DOTmLPF-P to build Plans, strategies, approaches, needs analysis studies, and Concepts of Operation (CONOPS).
D. Experience with only solution architectures.
E. Experience conducting work generated from DoDI "DoD Architecture Framework.”
F. Experience conducting work generated from "Zachman Architecture Framework.”
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract for Functional Area 3? | ||||||
| E☐ | V☐ | S☐ | M☐ | U☐ | N/A☐ |
| Functional Area 4 – Rapid Response |
| Yes` |
| No |
| Unknown |
A. Experience rapidly capturing/collecting, processing, and delivering (within 48 hours of notification/crisis) raster data (i.e., orthorectified nadir aerial imagery, oblique aerial imagery, LiDAR data, thermal data, etc.) that has been used for decision making during an urgent need (i.e., crisis/emergency, after a natural disaster, etc.).
B. Held a Federal contract and exercised a capability to conduct operations away from primary place of performance.
C. Experience providing reach back support, short and long-term, to support surge and crisis response.
D. Experience rapidly capturing/collecting, processing, and delivering (greater than 48 hours of notification/crisis) raster data (i.e., orthorectified nadir aerial imagery, oblique aerial imagery, LiDAR data, thermal data, etc.) that has been used for decision making during an urgent need (i.e., crisis/emergency, after a natural disaster, etc.).
E. Experience responding to outages and restoring supported systems within 24 hours (24/7/365).
F. Held a Federal contract with capability to conduct operations away from primary place of performance.
G. Experience rapidly capturing/collecting, processing, and delivering (within 14 days of notification/crisis) raster data (i.e., orthorectified nadir aerial imagery, oblique aerial imagery, LiDAR data, thermal data, etc.) that has been used for decision making during an urgent need (i.e., crisis/emergency, after a natural disaster, etc.).
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract for Functional Area 4? | ||||||
| E☐ | V☐ | S☐ | M☐ | U☐ | N/A☐ |
Section 5: General Comment Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired:
[click and pick the date]
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-mail: frank.batz@us.af.mil or Mail to: Frank Batz 1940 Allbrook Drive Area A, Bldg. 1, Rm. 300 Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45430
Relevant Work Descriptions:
1. Communication & Training. Past experience includes but is not limited to: working with USAF offices for increased capability/program awareness; developing and/or maintaining communications materials such as capability and program brochures, white papers, and fact sheets; providing training on GPS/GIS equipment/software currently used by the AF; working with military Public Affairs (PA) offices for increased capability/program awareness, event planning, including site selection analysis, preparing event approval documentation, coordinating event registration, coordinating the event management committee, assisting in development and deployment of event materials including the event schedule/agenda for attendees; providing geospatial technology training onsite and virtual including training on equipment, hands on training with GIS software, geospatial data for 10+ students per class, customers/audience using curriculum or syllabus, and working with commercial PR/PA/marketing offices for increased capability/program awareness.
2. Program Management. Past experience includes but is not limited to: providing enterprise architecture (integrating GIS solutions across an enterprise) adoption across multiple domains; providing geospatial strategic consulting for other Government Agencies including strategies, approaches, needs analysis studies, and feasibility studies for future capabilities; providing on-site program management of a GeoBase program or installation geospatial information and services for a DoD entity; providing non-government entity geospatial program office providing non-intelligence decision making support; developing geospatial segment architectures; providing geospatial strategic consulting for non-government entities including strategies, approaches, needs analysis studies, and feasibility studies for future capabilities; and assisting other Government Agencies (federal, state, local) geospatial program office providing non-intelligence decision making support.
3. Data & Technical Management. Past experience includes but is not limited to: Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment (SDSFIE); conducting work generated from AFI 17-140 "DAF Architecture Framework;” DOTmLPF-P; solving problems using DOTmLPF-P to build Plans, strategies, approaches, needs analysis studies, and Concepts of Operation (CONOPS); conducting work with only solution architectures; conducting work generated from DoDI "DoD Architecture Framework;” and conducting work generated from "Zachman Architecture Framework.”
4. Rapid Response. Past experience includes but is not limited to: rapidly capturing/collecting, processing, and delivering (within 48 hours of notification/crisis) raster data (i.e., orthorectified nadir aerial imagery, oblique aerial imagery, LiDAR data, thermal data, etc.) that has been used for decision making during an urgent need (i.e., crisis/emergency, after a natural disaster, etc.).Experience conducting work generated from AFI 17-140 "DAF Architecture Framework;” held a Federal contract and exercised a capability to conduct operations away from primary place of performance; provided reach back support, short and long-term, to support surge and crisis response; rapidly capturing/collecting, processing, and delivering (greater than 48 hours of notification/crisis) raster data (i.e., orthorectified nadir aerial imagery, oblique aerial imagery, LiDAR data, thermal data, etc.) that has been used for decision making during an urgent need (i.e., crisis/emergency, after a natural disaster, etc.); responding to outages and restoring supported systems within 24 hours (24/7/365); held a Federal contract with capability to conduct operations away from primary place of performance; and rapidly capturing/collecting, processing, and delivering (within 14 days of notification/crisis) raster data (i.e., orthorectified nadir aerial imagery, oblique aerial imagery, LiDAR data, thermal data, etc.) that has been used for decision making during an urgent need (i.e., crisis/emergency, after a natural disaster, etc.).
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 8 of 8 image1.emf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .