Attachment 6_Past Performance Questionnaire_PD2.doc

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION I: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by Offeror)

1. CONTRACTOR’S NAME & ADDRESS:

2. CAGE CODE OF PRIME CONTRACTOR:

3. CONTRACT NUMBER (include task number if applicable):

4. AWARD ENVIRONMENT:

COMPETITIVE NON-COMPETITIVE

5. CONTRACT TYPE:

6. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (including options):

7. INTIAL CONTRACT VALUE (including options):

8. CURRENT/FINAL CONTRACT VALUE (including options):

9. REASONS FOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INITIAL CONTRACT VALUE AND FINAL CONTRACT VALUE:

10. DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCTS/SERVICE PROVIDED:

11. LOCATION SERVICES PROVIDED (local, nationwide, worldwide, etc.):

SECTION II. EVALUATOR AND AGENCY IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by the Evaluator)

1. AGENCY (CUSTOMER) NAME:

2. EVALUATOR NAME & TITLE:

3. EVALUATOR CONTACT INFORMATION: TEL NO.:

E-MAIL:

4. NUMBER OF YEARS EVALUATOR WORKED ON SUBJECT CONTRACT:

SECTION III. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS/EVALUATION

Adjectival ratings definitions to be used in your response:

EXCEPTIONAL (E) (Blue): During the contract period, contractor performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD (VG) (Purple): During the contract period, contractor performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective

SATISFACTORY(S) (Green): During the contract period, contractor performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL (M) (Yellow): During the contract period, contractor performance does not or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY (U) (Red): During the contract period, contractor performance does not or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery in a timely manner is not likely. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

No Knowledge of This Element (NA): No knowledge of this element or does not apply to meeting contractual requirements

SECTION III. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS/EVALUATION

PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENT

RATING

E

VG

S M U

NA

1. Contractor demonstrated a thorough understanding of technical requirements of the contract/task.

file_0.bin file_1.bin file_2.bin file_3.bin file_4.bin file_5.bin

Comments:

2. Contractor managed and directed resources (i.e. personnel, subcontractors, equipment, etc.) effectively. Contractor met or exceeded program cost, schedule, and performance goals. Contractor forecasted, managed, and controlled contract cost/price. Contractor invoiced appropriately and in a timely manner.

file_6.bin file_7.bin file_8.bin file_9.bin file_10.bin file_11.bin

3. Contractor recruited, hired, and trained a qualified workforce with the appropriate skill levels to perform the required work.

file_12.bin file_13.bin file_14.bin file_15.bin file_16.bin file_17.bin

4. Contractor retained a qualified workforce with the appropriate skill levels and maintained a low turnover rate. Contractor replaced departing personnel with employees of the same quality and skills with minimal disruption to performance.

file_18.bin file_19.bin file_20.bin file_21.bin file_22.bin file_23.bin

5. Contractor developed and implemented innovative processes and methodologies. Contractor improved efficiencies through innovative processes and approaches.

file_24.bin file_25.bin file_26.bin file_27.bin file_28.bin file_29.bin

6. Contractor anticipated, identified, and resolved problems effectively and in a timely manner. Contractor suggested alternative approaches to unresolved problems. Contractor identified and reduced unanticipated risks.

file_30.bin file_31.bin file_32.bin file_33.bin file_34.bin file_35.bin

7. Contractor provided accurate, complete and high quality performance and deliverables as related to the following:

Program Management Support

Portfolio Management Support

Financial Management Support file_36.bin file_37.bin file_38.bin file_39.bin file_40.bin file_41.bin file_42.bin file_43.bin file_44.bin file_45.bin file_46.bin file_47.bin file_48.bin file_49.bin file_50.bin file_51.bin file_52.bin file_53.bin

8. Contractor developed realistic schedules and met established schedules and delivery dates file_54.bin file_55.bin file_56.bin file_57.bin file_58.bin file_59.bin

9. Contractor was responsive to contract changes. Contractor complied with the terms of the contract.

file_60.bin file_61.bin file_62.bin file_63.bin file_64.bin file_65.bin

10. Contractor cooperated with Government personnel after award.

file_66.bin file_67.bin file_68.bin file_69.bin file_70.bin file_71.bin

11. Contractor provided an innovative solution.

file_72.bin file_73.bin file_74.bin file_75.bin file_76.bin file_77.bin

RATING

YES

NO

12. Contractor was issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract. If yes, please explain the outcome.

file_78.bin file_79.bin

13. The contractor is rated in Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS).

file_80.bin file_81.bin

14. I would recommend award to this contractor again.

file_82.bin file_83.bin

OVERALL RATING

EXCEPTIONAL

(E) (Blue)

VERY GOOD

(VG) (Purple)

SATISFACTORY

(S) (Green)

MARGINAL

(M) (Yellow) file_84.bin

UNSATISFACTORY

(U) (Red)

EVALUATOR’S SIGNATURE DATE: