Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire Final.docx
DOCX document 54 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Hangar Door Inspections & Maintenance Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA500022Q0038
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a firm competing for a fixed-price contract to provide hangar door inspections and maintenance services at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska. The contractor must have experience inspecting and maintaining various types of aircraft hangar doors, including emergency response capabilities. References are requested to evaluate the firm's performance on prior contracts within the last five years for similar services. The questionnaire collects information on previous contracts and evaluates the contractor's ability to meet schedules and requirements, provide qualified staff, maintain standards, and respond to issues. Completed questionnaires must be returned to the contracting officer representatives by July 1, 2022.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ FA500022Q0038 - Hangar Doors Final 20220614.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Pricing Worksheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 Wage Determination 2015-5681 Revision 15.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 PWS Hangar Door .pdf | ||
| RFQ FA500022Q0038 - Hangar Doors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 Section 01500 Environmental Protection on JBER.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
RFQ FA500022Q0038
Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO: ________________________
__________________________is currently participating as a respondent to the Government’s Request for Quotation No. FA500022Q0038 for Hangar Door Inspections and Maintenance services at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. We anticipate awarding a firm-fixed-price contract.
The Government will be selecting Contractors for this project based on selection factors. One of the key factors in the Government’s final decision is past performance. To assist the Government in its assessment of Contractor past performance, we are required to identify previous projects and clients who are familiar with our past work. For the purposes of this questionnaire, past work is defined as contracts performed and/or being performing for any customer within the last five (5) years from the issuance day of the solicitation 1 June 2022.
As one of our customers for past contracting work on __________________________________, we are requesting that you complete the attached questionnaire regarding our past performance. This letter also authorizes you to discuss our past performance with the Government and to release information regarding our past performance to the Government.
Your prompt attention in completing the attached questionnaire will ensure we receive full consideration in this competition. Please return the completed form to the Government point of contacts (POCs) identified below, response is required no later than 1:00 P.M. Alaska Daylight Time (AKDT) on Friday, July 01, 2022.
Government POCs Stephen Hulsey – stephen.hulsey@us.af.mil Viola Stepetin – viola.stepetin@us.af.mil
Thank you for your assistance.
(Signature and title of individual with the authority to sign for and legally bind the Contractor)
Attachment : Past Performance Questionnaire
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Program Title:
F. Brief Description of Services Performed:
G. Period of Performance:
H. Contract Dollar Value:
I. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
E. Other suggested points of contact:
Section 4: Performance Information
| Scope of Work |
| Yes |
| No |
1. Does your contract include the inspection of Aircraft Hangar doors.
2. Does your contract include the maintenance of Aircraft Hangar Doors
3. Does your contract include emergency services for Aircraft Hangar doors?
4. Does your contract include the inspection and maintenance of various types of Aircraft Hangar Doors to include but not limited to:
MEGA Doors 1990-1998, McKee 2012, Premier 2008-2010
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| O |
| Outstanding |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or did meet) all contract requirements and is exceeding (or did exceed) some, if not all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action. |
| S |
| Satisfactory |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or did meet) contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action. |
| U |
| Unacceptable |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) contract requirements. For any problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required. |
| N/A |
| Not Applicable |
| Used if the rating(s) are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation. |
| Contractor Performance: |
| O |
| S |
| U |
| N/A |
1. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to maintain standards outlined in your Performance Work Statement, Statement of Work, or equivalent requirements documents?
2. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to proactively respond, recognize, resolve unanticipated difficulties, correct deficiencies, re‐performance, or emergencies in the manner consistent with the contract’s quality control procedure?
3. How well did the contractor provide for sufficient and qualified manpower in the performance of this contract?
4. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to remain on schedule, meet specific response times, and scheduled time frames for completion of specific tasks while still providing quality service?
5. How would you rate the Contractor’s customer service?
6. Would you hire this Contractor again? If not, please explain.
[click and pick the date]
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Stephen Hulsey – stephen.hulsey@us.af.mil Viola Stepetin – viola.stepetin@us.af.mil
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 1 of 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .