Attachment 6 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 23 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24926R0013
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for evaluating contractor performance on Project 621-22-108 - Replace Site Underground Chilled Water Piping at James H. Quillen VAMC in Mountain Home, Tennessee. The questionnaire is administered by NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity and directed to past customers or assessors of prospective contractors bidding on this VA solicitation (36C24926R0013). Completed questionnaires must be submitted directly to Contracting Specialist Robert Glenn, Jr. at Robert.glenn2@va.gov by March 2, 2026, at 2:00 PM EDT.
Section A is completed by the contractor and authorizes release of performance information to the Government. Section B, to be completed by assessors, evaluates contractor performance across three categories: Quality of Service (compliance with contractual requirements and overall quality rating); Schedule (timely delivery and cost control, invoicing accuracy and timeliness); and Business Relations (business practices, working relationship management, timely reporting, and responsiveness to complaints). All ratings use a binary scale of "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable," with explanations required for any unsatisfactory designations. Assessors are also asked whether they would award another contract to the contractor and to provide an overall performance rating. The questionnaire serves as a critical evaluation tool in the Government's proposal assessment process and does not address specific product or service requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 621-22-108 - Replace Site Underground Chilled Water Piping _ RFI Updated Responses 3-5-2026.pdf | ||
| 36C24926R0013 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| 13.09_4_119-M100 Layout1_Revised.pdf | ||
| 13.08_4_119-MD100 Layout1_Revised.pdf | ||
| 621-22-108 - Replace Site Underground Chilled Water Piping _ RFI Responses.pdf | ||
| 36C24926R0013 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Project 621-22-108 _ Pre-Bid Sign-In Sheet - 02-13-2026.pdf | ||
| 36C24926R0013 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 9 Wage Determination - TN20250191 - Modification 0 - 01-02-2026.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 Contractor EMR Certification Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 Pricing Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 Specifications.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 General Condition Breakdown.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 Calc. of Self Performed Work.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 Drawings.pdf | ||
| 36C24926R0013_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 8 Request For Information Form.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project # 621-22-108 - Replace Site Underground Chilled Water Piping, at James H. Quillen VAMC Mountain Home, TN.
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation for Project 621-22-108 - Replace Site Underground Chilled Water Piping.
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contracting Specialist – Robert Glenn, Jr by way of email at Robert.glenn2@va.gov.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than March 2, 2026, at 2:00 PM EDT. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (Robert.glenn2@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number
Project/Requirement
Customer/Agency
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s ______________________________________
| Name and Address: | ______________________________________ | |
| ______________________________________ |
2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________
3. Phone number (with area code): ___________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award number: _________________________________________
5. Description of Services provided under contract: ______________________________
6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________Final ____
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
(Signature)
| _____________________________________________ | __________________________ | |
| (Name and Title of Authorizing Official) | (Date) |
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.)
RATING SCALE Definitions Past Performance Evaluation Ratings
| Rating |
| Description |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the |
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the |
Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
3. Delivery of service was within required time specified by contract requirements.
4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
BUSINESS RELATIONS
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.)
ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___
6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
| ______ | Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor. |
| ______ | Would most likely award another contract to this contractor. |
______ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if no better alternative existed.
______ Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.
______ Would not award another contract to this contractor.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
| ACCEPTABLE |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
| ________________________________________ | __________________________ | |
| (Signature) | (Date) |
| _______________________________________ | __________________________ | |
| (Typed or Printed Name) | (Organization Name) |
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .