Attachment_6_-_Brand_Name_Justification_-_Schlage.doc
DOC document 183 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Rehab Madison Junction Water Treatment System Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P1422R0006
About this file
This document provides a justification for the use of brand name products in a solicitation to rehabilitate the Madison Junction Water Treatment and Spring Collection System at Yellowstone National Park. The solicitation will require Schlage brand locksets, cores, keys, and associated hardware for two new sets of external doors at the water treatment building. Yellowstone National Park's locksmith technicians have only been trained on Schlage products due to budget constraints, and the park only stocks spare parts for Schlage finishes. Using another manufacturer's systems would require prohibitively expensive maintenance and training. The solicitation will be publicly posted on FedBizOpps.gov and competitively bid, with the general contractor seeking competitive pricing from suppliers. The project value is relatively small at only two sets of locksets.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P1422R0006_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment_3_Q_As_0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment_2_Q_As_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140P1422R0006_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| SignInSheet_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P1422R0006_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_-_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Attachment_9_-_Limitation_on_Subcontracting_Report_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sol_140P1422R0006.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_-_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_-_Plans.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_Specifications_Correction_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_10_-_Vaccination_Certification_Notification_to_DOI_Contractors_Template_082321_FINAL.pdf | ||
| Attachment_8_-_Brand_Name_Justification_-_Bosch.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_7_-_Brand_Name_Justification_-Sensus.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_5_-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_11_-_Certification_of_Vaccination_Form.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
United States Department of the Interior
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
INTERMOUNTAIN REGION
CONTRACTING PROGRAM
Justification for Brand Name Products Date:
2021/10/29 Project:
Rehabilitate the Madison Junction Water Treatment and Spring Collection System
1. Identifications
a. Agency:
National Park Service
b. Contracting Office:
Northern Rockies Major Acquisition Buying Office
2. Description of the action being approved:
The National Park Service (NPS) shall be soliciting for a construction contractor to rehabilitate the Madison Junction water treatment and spring collection system. This work includes construction of a new water collection system and pumphouse, as well as demolition of existing infrastructure. The documents included with the solicitation call for specific brand name products that are peculiar to one manufacturer. This written justification provides approval for limiting competition to the listed brand name products as authorized by the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR).
3. Description of supplies and services:
This project involves construction of a new water treatment / pumphouse building. The building will have two external sets of doors that each need locksets, cores, keys, and associated hardware. To maintain compatibility with the current system of locks and keys in the park, these locksets, cores, keys, and associated hardware need to be Schlage brand. See below for details.
| Product |
| Manufacturer |
| Qty. |
| Approx. Unit Price |
| Approx. Total Price |
| Locksets, Cores, Keys, and Associated Hardware |
| Schlage |
| 2 |
4. Authority:
a. 41 U.S.C. 253(c)(1): Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.
b. FAR Part 11.105: The Brand Name products are essential to the Government’s requirements, and market research indicates other companies’ similar products do not meet and cannot be modified to meet the agency’s needs.
c. FAR 6.302-1: The use of the name brand products are essential to the Government’s requirements, thereby precluding consideration of a product manufactured by another company. This Brand Name Justification covers only the portion of the acquisition which is brand name or peculiar to one manufacturer, and the approval level requirements will then only apply to that portion.
5. The description of the product’s unique qualifications or the unique nature of the acquisition:
Due to budget constraints, Yellowstone National Park cannot afford to train its technicians on the proper procedures for repairing equipment from each and every manufacturer of door lock-sets. Thus, the Park’s technicians have been trained to repair the lock sets for a single manufacturer: Schlage.
Due to budget constraints, Yellowstone National Park cannot afford to stock spare parts for all manufacturers of finish hardware. Thus, the park currently stocks parts for only one manufacturer: Schlage.
Refer to Item 9, below, for more information.
6. Efforts to obtain competition:
a. Efforts to ensure offers are solicited from as many potential sources as is practicable:
For acquisitions over $25,000 the solicitation will be issued on the Government’s Point of Entry, FedBizOpps.gov.
b. Presolicitation notice per FAR 5.2:
For acquisitions over $25,000 a presolicitation notice shall be posted on the Government’s Point of Entry, FedBizOpps.gov unless the exception noted at FAR Part 5.202(a)(13) applies.
7. Determination that costs will be fair & reasonable:
This contract will be bid out competitively, and the general contractor will likely seek parts from different suppliers to obtain competitive pricing. Numerous suppliers sell Schlage locksets, cores, keys, and associated hardware. Additionally, this project only involves two sets of locksets, cores, keys, and associated hardware, so is a relatively small purchase.
8. Description of the market research conducted:
Other manufacturers’ systems could be modified to provide the needed finish hardware services; however, the maintenance of the systems would be prohibitively expensive as noted in Item 5, above. In addition, the government could be harmed as noted in Item 9, below.
9. Other facts supporting other than full & open competition:
a. Reason why documents suitable for full & open competition have not been developed:
Refer to Item 5, above.
b. Data, estimated costs or other rationale as to the extent or harm to the Government:
The amount of time to repair malfunctioning equipment would increase if non-Schlage equipment is used because:
1. The park’s locksmiths would not be familiar with the equipment from all the different manufacturers.
2. The park could not maintain a supply of repair parts for all the different manufacturers and thus there would be delays in obtaining repair parts.
The amount of time to key locksets would increase if non-Schlage equipment is used because:
1. The park’s locksmith would have to research the process for keying the different manufacturers’ systems.
2. The park could not afford to maintain a supply of the necessary parts and thus the parts would have to be ordered and shipped.
Better security, overall service, and maintenance can be provided if a single finish hardware system is used for all park facilities.
10. Interested Sources:
This project will be awarded to a contractor who will look for suppliers for this product.
11. Actions to remove barriers to competition in the future for similar acquisitions:
When the current system becomes obsolete in the future, the park will use a competitive process to choose a new system.
12. Certifications:
Technical / Requirements Certification:
I certify that any supporting data that is the responsibility of technical or requirements personnel (i.e. verifying the Government’s minimum needs or schedule requirements or other rationale for other than full and open competition) and which form a basis for the justification have been certified as complete and accurate:
(Signature)________________________________________ (Date) __2021/10/29________ (Type or Print Name): __Molly M. Ohlen________________________________________ (Title):
Up to $25,000
I certify that the justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief:
(Signature) _______________________________________ (Date) __04/25/2022__________ (Type or Print Name): ____Stacy L. Vallie_________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .