Attachment 5 - Technical Worksheet - Indonesia.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Indonesia S&RTS
- Solicitation number
- HTC71126RE113
About this file
This is a Technical Worksheet attachment that establishes evaluation criteria and submission requirements for offerors responding to RFP HTC71126RE113 for Stevedoring and Related Terminal Services (S&RTS) at Indonesian ports. The worksheet requires offerors to demonstrate their capability across five technical evaluation areas: labor resources for 24/7 operations across multiple work sites with flexible scheduling; equipment including Material Handling Equipment (MHE) capable of moving all cargo classes and heavy tow equipment for vehicles up to 150,000 lbs with maintenance support; conveyance loading and discharge capabilities; a certified safety program compliant with USG or host nation requirements with availability of a safety officer; and requisite certifications and port access documentation. Offerors must provide substantive responses that clearly explain how they will meet minimum requirements rather than merely restating PWS language, with technical responses limited to 15 pages excluding cover sheets, tables of contents, photographs, certifications, and business licenses.
The worksheet emphasizes that responses must demonstrate sound technical approaches with detailed descriptions and clear rationale specific to port operations at Banyuwangi, Tanjung Priok, Surabaya, Panjang, and Semarang Perak. Offerors are required to provide certified English translations for any supporting documents issued in foreign languages and must submit proof of current HAZMAT certifications for at least two personnel per CFR Title 49 Section 172.702 and valid business licenses or work permits from the host nation for prime and subcontractors. The government will rate proposals as either "acceptable" (clearly meets minimum requirements) or "unacceptable" (does not clearly meet requirements), with any unacceptable rating on individual questions resulting in an overall unacceptable technical proposal rating. Failure to complete the worksheet in its entirety or attach all requested documents may result in ineligibility for award.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 - Schedule of Rates (SOR)_Indonesia_REVISED_03.11.26.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation Amendment HTC71126RE1130002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers_Round 2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation Amendment HTC71126RE1130001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers_Round 1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation - HTC71126RE113.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - RFP Information and General Compliance Worksheet_Indonesia.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Synopsis_Indonesia.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement_Indonesia.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Schedule of Rates (SOR)_Indonesia.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3 - Contractor Plan for Continuation of Essential Contractor Services_Indonesia.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP HTC71126RE113 – Attachment 5 Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 (When Filled-in, this Document becomes CUI//SP-SSEL)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 (When Filled-in, this Document becomes CUI//SP-SSEL)
Attachment 5: Technical Worksheet
Request for Proposal: HTC71126RE113
** Submission Rules & Instructions: **
1. Basis for Responses: All Offeror responses within this Technical Worksheet must be based on the requirements outlined in Attachment 1, Performance Work Statement (PWS). Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of their company's experience.
2. Substantive Responses Required: Offerors shall not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements. They must provide clear and convincing rationale demonstrating how they intend to meet the minimum requirements identified in the PWS. Responses that merely paraphrase the PWS, provide flowcharts listing PWS activities without explanation, or use generic phrases like "standard procedures will be employed" without detailed descriptions will be considered unacceptable.
3. Page Limit for Technical Evaluation: The Offeror's written technical response within this Worksheet shall not exceed 15 pages. This limit applies to all narrative and descriptive content provided for evaluation, including appendices, annexes, figures, and tables directly supporting the written response. Content exceeding this 15-page limit will be removed before evaluation.
4. Exclusions from Page Limit: The following content will not be subjected to the page limit:
· Cover Sheet
· Table of Contents
· Government-provided Instruction Page(s)
· Material Handling Equipment (MHE) Photographs
· HAZMAT Certification
· Signed self-certified letters
· Business Licenses
· Work Permits
5. Foreign Language Documents: Offerors must provide certified English translations for any supporting document issued in a language other than English (e.g., port certifications, licenses, permits). Documents shall be clearly titled and/or marked to allow easy identification of the original document and its corresponding English translation.
NOTE** Failure to complete this document in its entirety or attach requested documents may result in an Offeror being ineligible for award.
RATINGS:
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Technical Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| Technical Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation |
*An “unacceptable” rating on any question below will result in an overall “unacceptable” Technical Proposal rating.
The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s technical approach to determine if the Offeror submitted a sound approach for accomplishing the PWS task areas identified below:
Offeror Name: Click here to enter text.
1. Labor
Please describe your company’s ability to provide qualified and appropriate labor types necessary to meet the Government’s port support needs and required productivity. Include in your response how this labor will be utilized to provide flexible start times, operate multiple work sites, and transition to contingency operations, maintaining work schedules 24/7 as outlined in the PWS. (PWS Section 4) Click here to enter text.
2. Equipment
Please describe your company’s ability to secure, provide, and safely use the following: Material Handling Equipment (MHE), gear capable of moving all classes of cargo (vehicles, containers, aircraft, and breakbulk), and ramps (fixed or portable) with a capacity up to 70 Ton (or 72,574 Kgs). Include in your response how you will provide heavy tow equipment capable of handling inoperable wheel or track vehicles weighing up to 150,000 Lbs. (68,038.9 Kgs). Your response shall also address how you will provide maintenance support for the required equipment. (PWS Section 5) Click here to enter text.
3. Conveyance Loading/Discharge
Describe your capability to unload/discharge conveyances associated with requirements outlined in the PWS. (PWS Section 5) Click here to enter text.
4. Safety Program
Describe your safety program, how it is certified in compliance with USG or host nation authorities, and your ability to provide a safety officer at the port during operations at the COR’s request. (PWS Section 3) Click here to enter text.
5. Certifications/Port Access
5a. HAZMAT Certifications. Provide proof of current certification or signed self-certified letter stating at least two proposed personnel are trained and tested in handling Hazardous Material per the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Title 49, Section 172.702, or Host Nation equivalent. (PWS Section 3) Click here to enter text.
5b. Port Access. Provide proof of a valid and current business license or work permit for the prime and/or subcontractors issued by the applicable Host Nation as evidence to legally work at all named ports within the PWS. (PWS Section 4) Click here to enter text.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .