Attachment 5-PPQ (4 CONS).docx
DOCX document 84 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA480921R0014
About this file
This memorandum requests past and present performance information from contractors to evaluate proposals for an Air Traffic Control Instructors contract for Pope Army Air Field. Contractors must provide Air Traffic Control Instructors in accordance with the Performance Work Statement and solicitation attachments. Respondents are asked to complete a questionnaire regarding a contractor's performance on prior contracts by 30 July 2021, detailing quality, cost control, schedule, business relationships, management of key personnel, and customer satisfaction. The responding agency must email or mail the completed questionnaire directly to contracting officials by the response date for consideration in proposal evaluations for this services contract solicitation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE INSTALLATION CONTRACTING AGENCY
FA480921R0014
Attachment 7 20 July 2021
| MEMORANDUM FOR _________________________________________ | _______________ | ||
| (Respondent) | (Date) |
FROM: 4 CONS/PKB
1570 Wright Brothers Ave Seymour Johnson AFB NC 27531-2456
SUBJECT: Request for Present and Past Performance Information, Solicitation No. FA480921R0014
1. 352 Special Warfare Training Sqaudron (SWTS) is in the process of selecting contractors for award of a Air Traffic Control Instructors contract. Detailed information regarding this solicitation may be found at https://www.sam.gov by searching Reference No.: FA480921R0014.
2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s Present and Past Performance on contracts, which reflects the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.
3. Areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the attached questionnaire, which have been requested to be forwarded by the offeror to his customers. We need your written response by 30 July 2021. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the information prior to start of negotiations. It is important that you return the completed questionnaire directly to the Government.
4. To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and scanned/emailed to, SSgt Joshua Lewis at joshua.lewis.44@us.af.mil and Michael Demers at michael.demers.4@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.
5. Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
//Signed// MICHAEL J. DEMERS, Civ, USAF Contracting Officer
1 Attachment Present and Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________________ B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________________________ C. Contract number: ___________________________________________________________________________ D. Contract type: ______________________________________________________________________________ E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____ F. Period of performance: ______________________________________________________________________ G. Initial contract cost: $________________________________________________________________________ H. Current/final contract cost: $__________________________________________________________________ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
J. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________________________ B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): ___________________________________________________ C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: ___________________________________________________________________________ B. Evaluator's title: ____________________________________________________________________________ C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________________ Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _________________________________________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions on the following page
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Neutral |
| No record exists. |
| N/A |
| (Not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation |
NOTE: For statements indicating less than “Satisfactory”, please provide a brief explanation in the comments section of the survey.
| CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY FOR SERVICES |
| N/A |
| Neutral |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
a.) QUALITY OF SERVICE:
(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship.
(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.
(3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
b.) COST CONTROL:
(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.
c.) SCHEDULE:
(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.
(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
d.) BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:
(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.
(7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.
e.) MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:
(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.
(2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.
f.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
(1) The services provided adequately met the needs of the program.
(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the TPOC.
(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
No ___ Yes___
Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired. You may include information on any other contracts with the contractor that you believe are relevant to this source selection.
Evaluator’s Signature:
Printed Name of Evaluator: _____________________________________________________Date: ____________
Please email this completed “Present and Past Performance Questionnaire” directly to SSgt Joshua Lewis at joshua.lewis.44@us.af.mil and Michael Demers at michael.demers.4@us.af.mil on or before 30 July 2021.
If you do not have email capability, please mail your response marked “TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY” to:
| 4 CONS/PKB |
| ATTN: SSgt JOSHUA T LEWIS |
| 1570 WRIGHT BROTHERS AVE |
| SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB NC 27531-2456 |
Your prompt response is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance!
War-winning capabilities … on time, on cost image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .