Attachment 5_Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 371 KB Posted

Attached to
Launch Complex (LC) 39 Area Power Duct Bank Replacement
Solicitation number
80KSC026R0007
Issued by

About this file

This document is a NASA Past and Present Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation 80KSC026R0007, which involves a Launch Complex (LC) 39 Area Duct Bank System Replacement project. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a Design-Build Company's (DBC) performance across six key areas: overall performance, conformance to contract requirements, timeliness and schedule adherence, business and management practices, quality of work, and an overall rating. Respondents are asked to rate performance levels ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory for each category, with space provided for explanatory comments. The form also includes a final question asking whether the respondent would work with the firm again. The completed survey is to be emailed to Ben Crafton and Jacqueline Brooks at NASA, with an option to reference a Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) report in lieu of filling out the entire questionnaire.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Source Selection Sensitive Information (When Filled Out)

Source Selection Sensitive Information (When Filled Out)

ATTACHMENT 5 - PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE

QUESTIONNAIRE

80KSC026R0007 – Launch Complex (LC) 39 Area Duct Bank System Replacement

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: Telephone Number:

Address: Fax Number:

Point of Contact:

(The government enters the following information based on list of references provided by the offeror. The offeror will enter this information if the solicitation requires him to submit questionnaires to the references.)

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: *

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount: *

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: * Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well. IF THE REFERENCED PROJECT/CONTRACT HAS BEEN RATED IN A Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (i.e. CPARS) a copy or reference to that report will suffice in lieu of completing this questionnaire.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address: Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

Email Address:

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Ben Crafton at benjamin.p.crafton@nasa.gov and Jacqueline Brooks at jacqueline.a.brooks@nasa.gov mailto:benjamin.p.crafton@nasa.gov mailto:jacqueline.a.brooks@nasa.gov

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Please rate the Offeror utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions – The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Offeror’s performance.

Past Performance Evaluation Question 1. Performance

What is your assessment of the DBC’s ability to meet work requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Performance

Comments, if any:

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDED MOST contractual requirements. The work performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDED SOME contractual requirements. The work performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Design-Build Company's (DBC) corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the DBC were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MET SOME contractual requirements. The work performance included significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the DBC were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DID NOT MEET contractual requirements. The work performance included serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the DBC’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Question 2. Conformance to Contract Requirements What is your assessment of the DBC’s ability to conform to the contract requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Conform to Contract

Requirements

Comments, if any:

Question 3. Timeliness and Contract Schedule Adherence What is your assessment of the DBC’s ability to complete work tasks in a timely manner?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Adherence to Contract Schedules

Comments, if any:

Question 4. Business and Management What is your assessment of the DBC’s ability to conduct business in a timely and professional manner?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Management Responsiveness

Reasonable and Cooperative Behavior/

Commitment to Customer

Satisfaction

Concern for the Customer

Comments, if any.

Question 5. Quality of Work What is your assessment of the DBC’s ability to provide quality work and the overall quality of the project?

Quality of Work

Adherence to Good Workmanship

Comments, if any.

Question 6. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance What is your overall rating of the DBC’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Question 7. Would you work with this firm again?

Yes No

General Comments:

ATTACHMENT 5 - PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
80KSC026R0007 – Launch Complex (LC) 39 Area Duct Bank System Replacement
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Contractors Name:
Telephone Number:
Address 1:
Address 2:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
undefined:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work:
undefined_2:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
the: Off
Prime Contractor: Off
SubContractor: Off
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Address:
Telephone Number_2:
1:
2:
Fax Number_2:
Email Address:
Check Box15: Off
Check Box16: Off
Check Box17: Off
Check Box18: Off
Check Box19: Off
Check Box20: Off
Check Box21: Off
Check Box22: Off
Check Box23: Off
Check Box24: Off
Check Box25: Off
Check Box26: Off
Check Box27: Off
Check Box28: Off
Check Box29: Off
Check Box30: Off
Check Box31: Off
Check Box32: Off
Check Box33: Off
Check Box34: Off
Check Box35: Off
Check Box36: Off
Check Box37: Off
Check Box38: Off
Check Box39: Off
Check Box40: Off
Check Box41: Off
Check Box42: Off
Check Box43: Off
Check Box44: Off
Check Box45: Off
Check Box46: Off
Check Box47: Off
Check Box48: Off
Check Box49: Off
Check Box50: Off
Check Box51: Off
Check Box52: Off
Check Box53: Off
Check Box54: Off
Check Box55: Off
Check Box56: Off
Check Box57: Off
Check Box58: Off
Check Box59: Off
Check Box60: Off
Check Box61: Off
Check Box62: Off
Check Box63: Off
Check Box64: Off
Check Box65: Off
Check Box66: Off
Check Box67: Off
Check Box68: Off
Check Box69: Off
Check Box70: Off
Check Box71: Off

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .