Attachment 4 WWTP PPQ.pdf
PDF 337 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Wastewater Treatment Plant (Shaw AFB, SC)
- Solicitation number
- FA480323QB002
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for a federal contractor responding to solicitation FA480323QB002 for wastewater treatment plant services at Shaw Air Force Base in South Carolina. The questionnaire collects information on the contractor's previous relevant contracts including contract details, performance ratings in areas such as quality control and schedule adherence, and an overall performance rating. Respondents are asked to provide ratings and explanations for any marginal or unsatisfactory performance. The Air Combat Command of the Department of the Air Force issued the solicitation and will consider past performance as part of the contract award decision.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 7 Q_A Sheet 18 July 2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation WWTP_amendment 001 18 Jul 2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 7 Q_A Sheet 18 July 2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 6 NPDES Permits for Shaw and Wateree WWTPs.pdf | ||
| Solicitation WWTP_7 Jul 2023.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 Basic Insurance Compliance.pdf | ||
| PWS_WWTP_15 June 2023.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Wage Determination - Rev 19 Dec2722.txt | TXT text file |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: Telephone Number:
Address: Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
Contract performed as the ____ Prime Contractor ____ Sub-Contractor ____ Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: Title:
Address:
C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address:
20th Contracting Squadron, Shaw AFB, SC Attn: Adam Nicholas Email: adam.nicholas@us.af.mil & samantha.dunseith@us.af.mil
FA480323QB002
Attachment 4 mailto:nancy.hunt@us.af.mil mailto:Motaz.rishid@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, VG, S, M, U, and N/A) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E Exceptional
VG
Very Good
S Satisfactory
M Marginal
U Unsatisfactory
N/A Not Applicable
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements.
The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s Corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: Contract Number:
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The Contractor: E VG S M U N/A
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2 Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3 Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4 Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5 Followed approved quality control plan.
6 Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
The Contractor: E VG S M U N/A
7 Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8 Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9 Identified problems as they occurred.
10 Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11 Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12 Developed realistic progress schedules.
13 Met established project schedules.
14 Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15 Was responsive to contract changes.
16 Provided adequate project supervision.
17 Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18 Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19 Provided accurate and complete line-item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20 Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21 How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
23 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
24 Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: Contract Number:
Remarks:
| Contractors Name: |
| Telephone Number: |
| Address 1: |
| Address 2: |
| Address 3: |
| Address 4: |
| Fax Number: |
| Point of Contact: |
| Project Title and Brief Description of Work 1: |
| Project Title and Brief Description of Work 2: |
| Project Title and Brief Description of Work 3: |
| Contract Number Provided by Offeror: |
| Dollar Amount: |
| Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: |
| Contract performed as the: |
| Prime Contractor: |
| SubContractor: |
| Name of Respondent: |
| Title: |
| Address 1_2: |
| Address 2_2: |
| Address 3_2: |
| Telephone Number_2: |
| Fax Number_2: |
| Email Address: |
| CONTRACTORS NAME: |
| Contract Number: |
| EFollowed approved quality control plan: |
| VGFollowed approved quality control plan: |
| SFollowed approved quality control plan: |
| MFollowed approved quality control plan: |
| UFollowed approved quality control plan: |
| NAFollowed approved quality control plan: |
| EIdentified problems as they occurred: |
| VGIdentified problems as they occurred: |
| SIdentified problems as they occurred: |
| MIdentified problems as they occurred: |
| UIdentified problems as they occurred: |
| NAIdentified problems as they occurred: |
| ESuggested alternative approaches to problems: |
| VGSuggested alternative approaches to problems: |
| SSuggested alternative approaches to problems: |
| MSuggested alternative approaches to problems: |
| USuggested alternative approaches to problems: |
| NASuggested alternative approaches to problems: |
| EDisplayed initiative to solve problems: |
| VGDisplayed initiative to solve problems: |
| SDisplayed initiative to solve problems: |
| MDisplayed initiative to solve problems: |
| UDisplayed initiative to solve problems: |
| NADisplayed initiative to solve problems: |
| EDeveloped realistic progress schedules: |
| VGDeveloped realistic progress schedules: |
| SDeveloped realistic progress schedules: |
| MDeveloped realistic progress schedules: |
| UDeveloped realistic progress schedules: |
| NADeveloped realistic progress schedules: |
| EMet established project schedules: |
| VGMet established project schedules: |
| SMet established project schedules: |
| MMet established project schedules: |
| UMet established project schedules: |
| NAMet established project schedules: |
| EProvided timely resolution of warranty defects: |
| VGProvided timely resolution of warranty defects: |
| SProvided timely resolution of warranty defects: |
| MProvided timely resolution of warranty defects: |
| UProvided timely resolution of warranty defects: |
| NAProvided timely resolution of warranty defects: |
| EWas responsive to contract changes: |
| VGWas responsive to contract changes: |
| SWas responsive to contract changes: |
| MWas responsive to contract changes: |
| UWas responsive to contract changes: |
| NAWas responsive to contract changes: |
| EProvided adequate project supervision: |
| VGProvided adequate project supervision: |
| SProvided adequate project supervision: |
| MProvided adequate project supervision: |
| UProvided adequate project supervision: |
| NAProvided adequate project supervision: |
| EPaid subcontractorssuppliers in a timely manner: |
| VGPaid subcontractorssuppliers in a timely manner: |
| SPaid subcontractorssuppliers in a timely manner: |
| MPaid subcontractorssuppliers in a timely manner: |
| UPaid subcontractorssuppliers in a timely manner: |
| NAPaid subcontractorssuppliers in a timely manner: |
| ECooperated with Government personnel after award: |
| VGCooperated with Government personnel after award: |
| SCooperated with Government personnel after award: |
| MCooperated with Government personnel after award: |
| UCooperated with Government personnel after award: |
| NACooperated with Government personnel after award: |
| EHow would you rate the contractor s overall performance: |
| VGHow would you rate the contractor s overall performance: |
| SHow would you rate the contractor s overall performance: |
| MHow would you rate the contractor s overall performance: |
| UHow would you rate the contractor s overall performance: |
| NAHow would you rate the contractor s overall performance: |
| CONTRACTORS NAME_2: |
| Contract Number_2: |
| Remarks 1: |
| Remarks 2: |
| Remarks 3: |
| Remarks 4: |
| Remarks 5: |
| Remarks 6: |
| Remarks 7: |
| Remarks 8: |
| Remarks 9: |
| EHome office participated in solving significant local problems: |
| VGHome office participated in solving significant local problems: |
| SHome office participated in solving significant local problems: |
| MHome office participated in solving significant local problems: |
| UHome office participated in solving significant local problems: |
| NAHome office participated in solving significant local problems: |
| NAProvided timely resolution of contract discrepancies: |
| UProvided timely resolution of contract discrepancies: |
| MProvided timely resolution of contract discrepancies: |
| SProvided timely resolution of contract discrepancies: |
| VGProvided timely resolution of contract discrepancies: |
| EProvided timely resolution of contract discrepancies: |
| Text41: |
| Dropdown1: [Select One] |
| Dropdown2: [Select One] |
| Dropdown3: [Select One] |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .