Attachment 4 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).doc
DOC document 111 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W25G1V22R0018
About this file
This document contains a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for generator and uninterrupted power supply maintenance and repair services at Tobyhanna Army Depot. The contractor will be responsible for semi-annual preventative maintenance on all generators and UPS systems, including annual oil and load bank testing with reports due within two weeks. The contractor must also respond to repair calls within 72 hours and provide completion reports. Surveillance will be conducted by the Contracting Officer's Representative to ensure maintenance meets contract standards. Performance will be rated as excellent, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory. Corrective action reports and customer complaint records are included as appendices.
A related federal contract opportunity from the Department of the Army seeks proposals for the generator and UPS maintenance/repair services defined in the QASP. Proposals for the firm-fixed-price preventative maintenance and time-and-materials remedial repair contract are due on March 21, 2022. The solicitation number is W25G1V22R0018.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Generator and UPS Maintenance and Repair
19JUL2021
31 Vision
2 Mission 3 Purpose 4 Authority 5 Roles and Responsibilities
5.1 Contracting Officer (KO)
5.2 Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)
6 Performance Requirements and Method of Surveillance
6.1 Contract Surveillance
6.2 Surveillance Matrix
Appendix 1 - Surveillance Matrix Appendix 2 - Corrective Action Report (CAR) Appendix 3 - Customer Complaint Record Appendix 4 - Performance Assessment Report (PAR)
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Generator and UPS Maintenance and Repair 1 Vision
Maintain reliable and fully operational back up power systems throughout Tobyhanna Army Depot.
2 Mission
Tobyhanna is a recognized leader in providing world-class logistics support for Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C5ISR) Systems across the Department of Defense. Tobyhanna's Corporate Philosophy, dedicated workforce and electronics expertise ensure the depot is the Joint C5ISR provider of choice for all branches of the Armed Forces and our industry partners. Tobyhanna's unparalleled capabilities include full-spectrum support for sustainment, overhaul and repair, fabrication and manufacturing, engineering design and development, systems integration, technology insertion, modification, and global field support to our Warfighters. To support these capabilities Tobyhanna requires a fully functional Access Control System to ensure safety of employees and prevent unauthorized access into secure areas.
3 Purpose
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a government-developed document used to determine if the contractor's performance meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The QASP establishes procedures on how this assessment/inspection process will be conducted. It provides the detailed process for a continuous oversight process:
- What will be monitored
- How monitoring will take place
- Who will be conduct the monitoring
- How monitoring efforts and results will be documented
The contractor is responsible for implementing and delivering performance that meets contract standards using its Quality Control Plan (QCP). The QASP provides the structure for the government's surveillance of the contractor's performance to assure that it meets contract standards. It is the government's responsibility to be objective, fair and consistent in evaluating contractor performance.
The QASP is not part of the contract nor is it intended to duplicate the contractor's quality control plan. This QASP is a living document. Flexibility in the QASP is required to allow for an increase or decrease in the level of surveillance necessary based on contractor performance.
The government may provide a copy of the QASP to the contractor to facilitate open communication. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances might occur that are outside the control of the contractor.
Bottom line, the QASP should ensure early identification and resolution of performance issues to minimize impact on mission performance.
4 Authority
Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under Part 46 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Inspection of Services clauses, which provides for inspection, acceptance and documentation of the service called for in the contract or order. This acceptance is to be executed by the contracting officer or a duly authorized representative.
5 Roles and Responsibilities
The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities.
5.1 Contracting Officer (KO)
The Contracting Officer (KO) shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The KO shall also ensure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. Determine and document the final assessment of the contractor's performance in the governments past performance tracking system.
Assigned KO: TBD
Organization or Agency: Army Contracting Command (ACC)
Telephone: TBD
Email: TBD
5.2 Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)
The Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) is responsible for providing continuous technical oversight of the contractor's performance. The COR uses the QASP to conduct the oversight/surveillance process. The COR shall keep a Quality Assurance file that accurately documents the contractor's actual performance. The purpose is to ensure that the contractor meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The COR is responsible for reporting early identification of performance problems to the KO. The COR is required to provide an annual performance assessment to the KO which will be used in documenting past performance. The QASP is the primary tool for documenting contractor performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual change on the Government's behalf.
Assigned COR: David Hudak Organization or Agency: U.S. Army Garrison: Tobyhanna Telephone: 570-615-9954 Email: David.T.Hudak.CIV@Mail.MIL 6 Performance Requirements and Method of Surveillance
This section describes the special requirements for this effort. The following sub-sections provide details of various considerations on this effort.
6.1 Contract Surveillance
The goal of the QASP is to ensure that contractor performance is effectively monitored and documented. The COR's contribution is their professional, non-adversarial relationships with the KO, PM and the contractor, which enables positive, open and timely communications. The foundation of this relationship is built upon objective, fair, and consistent COR evaluations of contractor performance against contract requirements. The COR uses the methods contained in this QASP to ensure the contractor is in compliance with contract requirements. The COR function is responsible for a wide range of surveillance requirements that effectively measure and evaluate the contractor's performance. Additionally, this QASP is based on the premise that the contractor, not the government, is responsible for management and QC/QA actions to successfully meet the terms of the contract.
6.2 Surveillance Matrix
The Surveillance Matrix (Attachment 1) is the list of performance objectives and standards that must be performed by the contractor. This matrix details the method of surveillance the COR will use to validate and inspect these performance elements. Inspection of each element will be documented in the COR file.
Performance objectives define the desired outcomes. Performance Standards define the level of service required under the contract to successfully meet the performance objective. The inspection methodology defines how, when, and what will be assessed in measuring performance. The Government performs surveillance, using this QASP, to determine the quality of the contractor's performance as it relates to the performance element standards. The PRS should be used to form the foundation of the COR's inspection checklist.
In evaluating the quality of contractor’s performance, the following performance ratings may be used.
Performance
Rating Criteria
| Excellent / Outstanding |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Appendix 1 - Surveillance Matrix
| Statements |
| Standards/AQLs |
| Inspections |
| Ratings |
1.1The Contractor shall perform semi-annual preventative maintenance on all generators and UPS systems at Tobyhanna Army Depot. (PWS Sections 5.3, 5.4, 5.6 and 5.7) Deliverables:
Upon completion of preventative maintenance, the contractor shall provide a detailed report within two (2) weeks.
a) Identifies and corrects deficiencies
AQL: 100%
b) Addresses all errors and inadequacies
AQL: 100%
c) Provides Continuous operation
AQL: 100%
d) Maintains 100% operational readiness status
AQL: 100%
What: Functional Requirements
Frequency: Once every six months Who: The Contractor
Incentive: COR Monthly Report(s) Standard(s): Inspection applies to all standards
1.2The Contractor shall perfom annual oil testing on all generators. (PWS Section 5.7)
Deliverables:
Upon completion, the Contractor shall provide a deatailed report and analysis of the oil testing results.
1.3The Contractor shall perform annual load bank testing on all generators once per year. (PWS Section 5.8)
Upon completion, the Contractor shall provide a deatailed report and analysis of the load bank testing results.
1.4The Contractor shall respond to repair calls on site within 72 hours.
Upon completion of repair work, the Contractor shall provide a detailed report of of findings and corrective actions.
Appendix 2 - Corrective Action Report (CAR)
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR)
(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)
1. CONTRACTOR
2. CONTRACT NUMBER
3. TYPE OF SERVICES
4. FUNCTIONAL AREA
5. SUSPENSE DATE
6. CONTROL NUMBER
7. DEFICIENCY FORMCHECKBOX
MAJOR FORMCHECKBOX
MINOR
FINDING:
FINDING IMPACT:
Please respond with a written corrective action plan that details the corrective action of the cited deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and actions taken to prevent recurrence by Suspense Date in Block 5. If date was not entered in Block 5, the contractor is not required to provide a response.
8. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR)
TYPED NAME AND GRADE
SIGNATURE AND DATE
9. ISSUING AUTHORITY
TYPED NAME AND GRADE
SIGNATURE AND DATE
10. COR RESPONSE TO CONTRACTOR CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE
11. COR DETERMINATION
FORMCHECKBOX
ACCEPTED FORMCHECKBOX
REJECTED
12. CLOSE DATE
Appendix 3 - Customer Complaint Record
| CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD |
| DATE/TIME OF COMPLAINT |
SOURCE OF COMPLAINT
ORGANIZATION
BUILDING NUMBER
INDIVIDUAL
PHONE NUMBER
NATURE OF COMPLAINT
CONTRACT REFERENCE
VALIDATION
DATE/TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT
ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR
RECEIVED/VALIDATED BY
Appendix 4 - Performance Assessment Report (PAR)
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR)
(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)
| 1. CONTRACT/TASK ORDER NUMBER |
| 2. CONTRACTOR |
| 3. TYPE OF SERVICES |
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR) SIGNATURE AND DATE
| 5. COR PHONE |
| 6. SUSPENSE DATE |
I. PERFORMANCE
7. FORMCHECKBOX
DEFICIENCY (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY)
FORMCHECKBOX
NEW
FORMCHECKBOX
REPEAT
FORMCHECKBOX
NO DEFICIENCY NOTED
8. SERVICES SUMMARY or PWS PARAGRAPH ITEM REVIEWED
| 9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DEFICIENCY (IF DEFICIENCY BOX WAS CHECKED) |
| 10. DETAILED PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT |
II. CONTRACTOR VALIDATION
11. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE FORMCHECKBOX
CONCUR FORMCHECKBOX
NON-CONCUR
12. CORRECTIVE ACTION ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
13. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PREVENTION OF RECURRENCE OR REASON FOR NON-CONCURRENCE OF COR CITED DEFICIENCY
III. ACTION CORRECTED
14. FORMCHECKBOX
CONCUR FORMCHECKBOX
NON-CONCUR COR SIGNATURE AND DATE
15. COR REMARKS (REQUIRED)
6. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE REMARKS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .