Attachment 4_PPQ_Word.docx

DOCX document 61 KB Posted

Attached to
AFFSC Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4690_24_R-0005
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a federal contract opportunity. The PPQ is seeking information on the past performance of a contractor for a contract with the Department of the Air Force 28th Contracting Squadron at Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota.

The key details are: the contract number is FA4690-24-R-0005, the contract type is Firm Fixed Price, the contract period is for 1 year with a potential 6-month extension, the contract is a Women Owned Small Business (WOSB) set-aside under NAICS code 561110, and the award will be made on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis. The PPQ is asking the respondent to rate the contractor's performance across 10 criteria including personnel, cost, timeliness, responsiveness, and quality. It also asks if the contractor was ever issued a cure notice or had the contract terminated, and if the respondent would award another contract to the contractor. The completed PPQ is to be emailed to the specified points of contact by August 2, 2024.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

28th Contracting squadron GROUP (afcsc)

ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE SOUTH DAKOTA

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE; FA4690-24-R-0005

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name:Telephone Number:
Address:Point of Contact:

Email:

CAGE Code:DUNS Number:
Contract Number:Dollar Amount:
Contract Type:Date of Award:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

Project Title and Brief Description of Work or Services performed:

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent:______________________ Title: ______________________________ Address: ________________________________ Telephone Number: __________________ ________________________________ Email Address: ___________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: brandon.montler.2@us.af.mil and timeaki.mcphee@us.af.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A, U and UNK) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Please provide an explanation for any ratings of U.

Rating
Definition
Acceptable (A)
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.
Unacceptable (U)
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown (UNK)
In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so spars that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:__________________CONTRACT NUMBER:____________________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above. Explain the circumstances of any “unsatisfactory” rating or general comments in the “Remarks” area of each item.

A
U
UKN
1
Rate how well the contractor provided adequate, competent and qualified personnel capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract.

Remarks:

A
U
UKN
2
Rate how well the contractor perform(s/ed) the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price.
A
U
UKN
3
Rate how timely and sufficient the contractor’s resources (manning levels, etc.) were/are to meet contract requirements (technical, management, and contractual).
A
U
UKN
4
Rate how well the contractor respond(s/ed) to and act(s/ed) on customer feedback.
A
U
UKN
5
Rate how well the contractor demonstrate(s/d) a reasonable and cooperative business relationship with the Government’s Program Management and Contract Management teams.
A
U
UKN
6
Rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s security and safety program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations.
A
U
UKN
7
Rate how timely and effective the contractor’s responses to and resolution of problems were/are.
A
U
UKN
8
Rate how flexible, cooperative, and reasonable the contractor was/is in meeting mission requirements, particularly during short-notice mission changes.
A
U
UKN
9
Rate how responsive the contractor’s quality program was/is in identifying, correcting, and preventing initial and recurring contract discrepancies.
A
U
UKN
10
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice, or was the contract terminated? If yes, please explain.
YES
NO
11
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain.
YES
NO

Email to: brandon.montler.2@us.af.mil Timeaki.mcphee@us.af.mil image1.gif

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .