Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx
DOCX document 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Travis AFB - Sheep Grazing Services
- Solicitation number
- FA442726Q1121
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template issued by the 60th Contracting Squadron at Travis Air Force Base, California for the Travis AFB Sheep Grazing Services solicitation (FA442726Q1121). The PPQ requests that references identified by offerors complete a structured evaluation of the contractor's past performance on similar work.
The questionnaire requires references to provide offeror information, respondent information (the reference entity), and detailed contract information including contract name, description, performance period, contract value, and contractor role. References must rate contractor performance across six categories—Quality of Service, On-Time Delivery of Service, Management of Service, Communication, Contract Terms and Condition Adherence, and Overall Performance—using a five-point scale from Unsatisfactory (1) to Exceptional (5). Narrative explanations are required for any ratings of 1, 2, or 5. References must also indicate whether the contractor received any Corrective Action Reports or similar deficiency reports and whether they would award another contract to the contractor. Completed questionnaires must be submitted as PDF files to A1C Trong Hoang (trong.hoang@us.af.mil) or Ms. Christina Johnson (christina.johnson.32@us.af.mil) by March 4, 2026 at 4:30 PM PDT, with confirmation available by calling 707-424-7769. The completed PPQs become part of the official source selection record for evaluation purposes.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The 60th Contracting Squadron, Travis Air Force Base, CA is in the process of soliciting offers from companies capable of providing:
Travis AFB Sheep Grazing Services The contracting company eligible to submit a quotation for this requirement has identified you as their recent customer capable of providing performance ratings on similar requirements they have performed or currently performing for you, your business, or your organization.
In order for 60th Contracting Squadron to conduct its evaluation, we request that you complete the questionnaire below and email a PDF file to A1C Trong Hoang, Contract Specialist (CS) at trong.hoang@us.af.mil or Ms. Christina Johnson, Contracting Officer (CO) at christina.johnson.32@us.af.mil. The due date for the submission of the completed questionnaire is: 4 March 2026 at 4:30 PM PDT. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.
To confirm receipt of your submitted PPQ, please contact A1C Hoang or Ms. Johnson at the email previously provided or you can call 707-424-7769.
PLEASE FILL THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
A. OFFEROR’S INFORMATION: The contracting company to whom who are completing this PPQ for.
CONTRACTOR:
ADDRESS:
POINT OF CONTACT (POC):
TITLE OF POC:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL:
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
COMPANY/BUSINESS/MILITARY BASE:
ADDRESS:
POINT OF CONTACT (POC):
TITLE OF POC:
PHONE NUMBER:
EMAIL:
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION: Please provide as much information as you can regarding the contract that the contracting company has performed or is still performing for you, your business, or your organization.
CONTRACT NAME AND/OR NUMBER
CONTRACT DESCRIPTION
PERFORMANCE PERIOD:
ANNUAL CONTRACT VALUE:
TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE (FOR THE FULL DURATION OF THE CONTRACT):
CONTRACTOR PERFORMED AS (PRIME CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR):
IF SUBCONTRACTOR, WHAT PERCENTAGE WAS PERFOMED BY THE CONTRACTING COMPANY?
C. PERFOMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the Contracting Company’s performance. Please provide a narrative explanation for any ratings of 1, 2, or 5.
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
| The contractor is substantially failing or has substantially failed to meet the performance standards outlined in our contractual agreement. (Provide explanation under Remarks) |
| The contractor has shown some deficiencies in meeting the performance standards of our contractual agreement. (Provide explanation under Remarks) |
| The contractor is meeting or has met the performance standards outlined in our contractual agreement. |
| The contractor exceeds or has exceeded the minimum performance standards outlined in our contractual agreement. |
| The contractor substantially exceeds or has substantially exceeded performance expectations, resulting in significant positive impacts. (Provide explanation under Remarks) |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| 2 |
| ON-TIME DELIVERY OF SERVICE |
| 3 |
| MANAGEMENT OF SERVICE |
| 4 |
| COMMUNICATION |
| 5 |
| CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITION ADHERANCE |
| 6 |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance |
| 7 |
| Was the Contractor ever issued a Corrective Actions Report (CAR) or other similar deficiently reports? |
| 8 |
| Would you award another contract to this Contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
Remarks
Signature:
Print Name:
Title:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .