Attachment_4-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 322 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Moorage - Port Call Kodiak Alasaka
- Solicitation number
- 1333MK26Q0032
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used for source selection in federal contracting, specifically for solicitation 1333MK26Q issued by NOAA. The questionnaire is designed to collect and document contractor performance ratings from prior contract experiences.
The form evaluates contractor performance across four key assessment categories: Quality of Service, Schedule, Cost Control, and Management. Each category uses a standardized five-point rating scale—Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory—with detailed definitions for each rating level. Quality of Service assesses performance against contractual requirements, specifications, and standards of workmanship. Schedule evaluates timeliness in completing contracts, task orders, milestones, and delivery schedules. Cost Control measures the contractor's effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling costs. Management assesses integration and coordination of all contract activities, including problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, contractor behavior, and customer satisfaction. The form requires respondents to provide comments supporting their ratings and must be completed and submitted to Christopher Baker at Christopher.Baker@NOAA.GOV by a specified deadline. Completed questionnaires must include the rater's name, signature, email address, phone number, and date, along with identification of the contractor being reviewed, a brief description of the contract, the reference contract number, and the person completing the questionnaire.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_1333MK26Q0032_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| FA_SOW_Kodiak_2026_rev1_0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_1333MK26Q0032_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| SON_SH_MooringKodiak.docx | DOCX document | |
| 15-5687.txt | TXT text file | |
| FA_SOW_Kodiak_2026.docx | DOCX document | |
| RA_Statement_of_Work.pdf | ||
| SCA_Poster_Required_for_all_Service_Contracts.pdf | ||
| Sol_1333MK26Q0032.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4:
PAST PERFORMANCE
QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACTOR BEING REVIEWED:
PERSON COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE:
REFERENCE CONTRACT #:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION:
Send Completed Questionnaire to at no later than
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Source Selection Information
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the
4. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: ___________________________
Rater’s Signature: ________________________
Rater's Email Address______________________
Rater's Phone #___________________________
Date: ____________________________________
| CONTRACTOR BEING REVIEWED: |
| BRIEF DESCRIPTION: |
| REFERENCE CONTRACT: |
| PERSON COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE: |
| DEFINITION: |
| RATINGRow1: |
| EXCEPTIONAL: |
| RATINGRow2: |
| VERY GOOD: |
| RATINGRow3: |
| SATISFACTORY: |
| RATINGRow4: |
| MARGINAL: |
| RATINGRow5: |
| UNSATISFACTORY: |
| DEFINITION_2: |
| RATINGRow1_2: |
| EXCEPTIONAL_2: |
| RATINGRow2_2: |
| VERY GOOD_2: |
| RATINGRow3_2: |
| SATISFACTORY_2: |
| RATINGRow4_2: |
| MARGINAL_2: |
| RATINGRow5_2: |
| UNSATISFACTORY_2: |
| DEFINITION_3: |
| RATINGRow1_3: |
| EXCEPTIONAL_3: |
| RATINGRow2_3: |
| VERY GOOD_3: |
| RATINGRow3_3: |
| SATISFACTORY_3: |
| RATINGRow4_3: |
| MARGINAL_3: |
| RATINGRow5_3: |
| UNSATISFACTORY_3: |
| DEFINITION_4: |
| RATINGRow1_4: |
| EXCEPTIONAL_4: |
| RATINGRow2_4: |
| VERY GOOD_4: |
| RATINGRow3_4: |
| SATISFACTORY_4: |
| RATINGRow4_4: |
| MARGINAL_4: |
| RATINGRow5_4: |
| UNSATISFACTORY_4: |
| Raters Name: |
| Date: |
| Text1: 1333MK26Q |
| Date4_af_date: |
| Text2: Christopher.Baker@NOAA.GOV |
| Text3: |
| Text5: Christopher Baker |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .