Attachment 4 - Evaluation Factors.pdf
PDF 234 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Catholic Religious Education Coordinator
- Solicitation number
- FA4419-25-Q-0028
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Factors attachment for a federal solicitation (FA4419-25-Q-0028) for a Catholic Religious Education Coordinator contract at Altus Air Force Base. The solicitation uses a best value trade-off methodology, evaluating offers on two primary factors: Price and Technical Acceptability. For pricing, the government will calculate Total Evaluated Price (TEP) across the base year and four option years, plus an additional 50% of Option Year 4 to account for potential service extensions. Technical evaluation will assign an "acceptable" or "unacceptable" rating based on how well the vendor's quote meets the Performance Work Statement requirements.
Key contract details include a 100% Small Business Set Aside under NAICS code 611710, with vendors required to be registered in SAM.gov throughout the contract duration. The Catholic Religious Education Coordinator will support the Altus AFB Chapel by providing religious education opportunities, with award made to the contractor determined to represent the best value to the government. Vendors must submit a technical response demonstrating how they will meet solicitation requirements, with the government expecting to select the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (NOV 2021)
As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows:
Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Price Technical Acceptability
(End of provision)
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2:
Best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price.
By submission of its quote, the vendor accepts all solicitation requirements, including all technical requirements and terms and conditions. Failure to conform to solicitation requirements may result in a quote being determined not awardable without further evaluation. The evaluation criteria are detailed below:
Factor 1 – Price. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose quotation conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the low quote for a higher quality item.
Prices will be evaluated on the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). TEP shall be the total of all years, base year and four
(4) option years, plus an additional 50% of the total of Option Year 4. The additional 50% represents the total cumulative price of 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. Should FAR clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, be exercised in the future, the price will be pro-rated to the actual performance required.
Factor 2 – Technical. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the vendor’s quoted item meets all of the provided information from the Performance Work Statement. Each vendor’s quote will be evaluated against technical requirements and will be assigned a rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable.” Technical submission must be completed using a secondary document. The Technical information shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Quotes shall not simply rephrase or restate the Performance Work Statement or contain general statements such as “Standard procedures will be employed.” Proposals shall provide convincing rationale addressing how the technical portion of the offer meets solicitation requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s experience. The Government will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offer.
Rating Description:
“Acceptable” - Quote clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
“Unacceptable” - Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
The quote will be determined technically acceptable if it meets the requirements set out in the Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.
Item description:
The Catholic Religious Education Coordinator (Contractor) will support the Altus AFB Chapel by providing Catholic religious education opportunities for Altus Air Force Base. See the Performance Work Statement for more specific requirements and/or information. Award will be made to the contractor that is determined to be the best value to the government.
Vendor eligibility requirements:
Vendors must be registered in SAM.gov and must remain active through the length of the contract and any/all option years.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .