Attachment 4 Asbestos Survey.pdf

Report of

Asbestos Survey for

Lippencott Cottage Cottage Lane

St. Michael, Pennsylvania

Prepared for

Historic Preservation Training Center

106 Commerce Street

Frederick, MD 21701

Prepared by

Professional Service Industries, Inc.

850 Poplar Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15220

May 30, 2018

PSI Project # 08163361

Intertek-PSI 850 Poplar Street Pittsburgh, PA 15220

Tel +1 412.922.4001 Fax +1 412.922.4043 intertek.com/building

May 30, 2018

Historic Preservation Training Center 106 Commerce Street Frederick, MD 21701

Attention: Mr. Mark Andros Exhibits Specialist mark_andros@nps.gov

Subject: Asbestos Survey Lippencott Cottage- Johnstown Flood National Museum Cottage Lane St, Michael, Pennsylvania PSI Project# 08163361

Dear Mr. Andros:

Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) performed the Asbestos Survey that you requested. PSI provided its services in general accordance with our agreement dated May 15,2018. PSI transmits one copy with this letter.

PSI thanks you for choosing us as your consultant for this project. Please contact us at 412-922-4000 if you have any questions or we may be of further service.

Respectfully Submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.

Douglas E. Finke William L. Nicastro Project Manager Department Manager http://www.intertek.com/ mailto:mark_andros@nps.gov

Historic Preservation Training Lippencott Cottage PSI Project #8163361 May 30, 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES

2.2 PURPOSE

2.3 AUTHORIZATION

2.4 LIMITATIONS

2.5 WARRANTY

3 GENERAL BUILDING AND SURVEY INFORMATION

3.1 BUILDING INFORMATION

3.2 INSPECTION INFORMATION

4 METHODOLOGY

4.1 RECORD DOCUMENT REVIEW

4.2 VISUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES

4.3 ASBESTOS SAMPLING PROCEDURES

4.4 ASBESTOS ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

5 FINDINGS

5.1 ASBESTOS RESULTS

6 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 CONCLUSIONS

6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS [**EDIT AS APPROPRIATE***]

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A – REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS

APPENDIX B – ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE LOG/CHAIN OF CUSTODY

APPENDIX C – SITE LAYOUT AND SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING(S)

APPENDIX D – PHOTOLOG

APPENDIX E – INSPECTOR AND LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Professional Service Industries (PSI), Inc., was retained by Historic Preservation Training Center to conduct a survey for asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in the Lippencott Cottage, located at Cottage Lane St. Michael, Pennsylvania.

The subject building is an 8,860-sq. ft.,3-story, with basement historical residential structure that was constructed in the 1890’s and is part of the Johnstown Flood National Museum. The subject structure was unoccupied during the inspection.

The purpose of the investigation and sampling was to provide information regarding the presence, condition, and estimated quantity of accessible ACMs located at the facility prior to its planned renovation. Roof Systems were included in the scope of this survey.

The asbestos inspection and sampling was conducted on May 15, 2018. A total of 38 samples were collected from 15 suspect asbestos-containing homogeneous materials during the survey. The samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM).

The following six (6) ACMs (>1% asbestos) were identified during this investigation:

• (C-01) Exterior Window Caulking – All Windows

• (C-02) Exterior Window Glazing – All Windows

• (C-04) Boiler and Duct Seam Tape – In Basement on Duct Work and Residual on Boiler

• (C-07) Debris/Wall Insulation – Inside Wall on either side of windows and debris located on floors throughout

• (C-08) 12” x 12” Red Brick Patter Floor Tile – Kitchen

• (C-13) Roof Flashing – All Porch Roofs

In addition, the following materials were not sampled due to inaccessibility, safety concerns, or in order to avoid compromising their integrity, and are assumed to be ACM:

• None

The identified or assumed ACMs were observed to be in damaged and significantly damaged condition at the time of the field investigation. The duct seam tape and debris/wall insulation were in significantly damaged condition. The seam tape can be found throughout the basement sitting on top of soil and mixed with other debris. The wall insulation is pieces of insulation packed inside the wall. In certain areas where the plaster wall is damaged there is debris of the insulation found throughout the house. These materials need to be addressed prior to any upcoming renovations.

ACMs should be maintained in a good non-damaged condition through use of an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) program. Regulated ACM (RACM) must be properly removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovations or demolition that would disturb the material.

Federal, State and Local regulations and guidelines should be strictly adhered to when removing the ACM.

In many areas, EPA Category I & II non-friable ACMs in good condition do not need to be removed prior to demolition. However, if demolition practices will cause these materials to be cut, sanded, ground or abraded, or otherwise made friable, they should be treated as RACM and removed prior to demolition. If non-friable ACM’s are not removed prior to demolition, the generated debris cannot be recycled, burned or used as clean-fill.

In addition, prior to any future maintenance, renovation or demolition activities, any assumed ACMs should be tested, and any areas noted as inaccessible during this project, or any concealed areas, such as behind walls, where suspect ACMs are discovered, will require a survey for ACM.

The following materials were point counted and determined to contain ≤1% asbestos; therefore they are not considered to be ACM by EPA or OSHA.

• (C-15) Roof Tar – Main Roof

These materials are unregulated by EPA, and are considered unclassified asbestos work per OSHA. Some OSHA work control practices and prohibitions will still apply, with the extent depending on whether the worker's exposure to airborne asbestos exceeds the OSHA PEL during the renovation/demolition process.

This summary does not contain all the information presented in the full report. The report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the information provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this information.

2 INTRODUCTION

2.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of services for this project consisted of conducting an asbestos survey, including inspection, sampling and analysis of all accessible and exposed interior and exterior areas at the subject facility, including the roof.

The investigation included a review of client-provided records or documents (if available), visual inspection of the subject area(s), sample collection, polarized light microscopy (PLM) sample analysis, quantification of ACMs, and report preparation & review.

2.2 PURPOSE

The purpose of this survey was to provide general information for the subject building(s) regarding the presence, condition, and quantity of accessible and/or exposed friable and non-friable, building materials that contain asbestos.

2.3 AUTHORIZATION

Email authorization to perform this work was given on April 30, 2018 by Mark Andros, Exhibits Specialist, Historic Preservation Training Center. The project was conducted in accordance with the scope, terms and conditions of PSI Proposal No. 08163361, dated April 12, 2018.

2.4 LIMITATIONS

This asbestos survey was intended to meet the requirements of the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Asbestos demolition or renovation. The survey included a thorough inspection of all areas of planned renovation.

Roof Systems were included in the scope of this survey.

Destructive sampling, such as behind finished surfaces (plaster/drywall walls, above hard ceilings, etc.), inside mechanical chases, behind mirrored walls, etc., was not generally conducted to assess inaccessible or concealed materials.

PSI did not sample any system which presented a hazard to the inspection team such as energized electrical systems or within confined spaces.

PSI did not collect samples from building elements where the intended use would be compromised by testing, such as fire rated doors, vapor barriers, mirror mastics, etc.

2.5 WARRANTY

The field and laboratory results reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to determine the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM for the building structure.

Professional Service Industries (PSI), Inc., warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in general accordance with accepted professional practices at the time of its preparation as applied by professionals in the community. Changes in the state of the art or in applicable regulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed in this report.

The survey and analytical methods have been used to provide the client with information regarding the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM existing at the time of the inspection. Test results are valid only for the material(s) tested. There is a distinct possibility that conditions may exist which could not be identified within the scope of the study or which were not apparent during the site visit. This inspection covered only those areas that were exposed and/or physically accessible to the Inspector. The study is also limited to the information available from the client at the time it was conducted.

No other warranties are implied or expressed.

3 GENERAL BUILDING AND SURVEY INFORMATION

3.1 BUILDING INFORMATION

Subject Property: Lippencott Cottage Cottage Lane St. Michael, Pennsylvania

Facility Construction Date: 1890’s

Previous Renovation Dates: Unknown

Number of Floors: 3-stories with basement level

Square Footage: 8,860 sq. ft.

Construction Type Wood frame structure

Building Occupant(s): Vacant

3.2 INSPECTION INFORMATION

Name of PSI Inspector(s): Douglas Finke #042272

Date(s) of Inspection: May 15, 2018

Escort: Mark Andros

4 METHODOLOGY

Inspection and sampling procedures were performed in general accordance with the guidelines published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The inspection and survey described below was performed by an EPA accredited and State of Pennsylvania inspector.

4.1 RECORD DOCUMENT REVIEW

Prior to conducting the visual inspection, PSI reviewed documents provided by the client, including: drawings, floor plans, historical data, maintenance records, previous survey reports, laboratory reports, etc. for information regarding construction history and building materials.

The following documents were reviewed as a part of this Asbestos Survey:

• Existing Conditions for the Moorhead Cottage, Page 21-30, Landmarks Design Associates Architects, November 30, 1992

This data was used to focus the walk through and scope of work to be followed over the course of our visual inspection and sampling. Information obtained from the references is included in the findings section of the report.

4.2 VISUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES

An initial individual building structure walkthrough was conducted to determine the presence of suspect asbestos-containing materials that were accessible and/or exposed. Exterior areas, including the roof systems, were included in the scope of this investigation.

The inspection and sampling was limited to those areas and materials that were accessible and did not involve destruction of walls, other building elements, physical barriers, or the structural integrity of the item being tested.

Materials which were similar in color, texture, general appearance and which appear to have been installed at the same time were grouped in Homogeneous Sampling Areas. Such materials are termed "homogeneous materials" by the EPA. During this walkthrough, the approximate locations of these homogeneous materials were also noted.

The inspector evaluated the overall condition of the material and determined whether the materials were friable or non-friable by touching the material, where practical. A friable material is defined as any material able to be crushed, crumbled, pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand press when dry.

Each material was further assessed for overall condition. Conditions were rated as good, damaged or significantly damaged. PSI’s inspector also identified the EPA classification of the material:

Regulated ACM (RACM), Category I non-friable ACM, and Category II non-friable ACM, based on the materials current condition. PSI’s inspector provided estimated quantities of the materials identified as ACM, based only on materials that were accessible and exposed.

4.3 ASBESTOS SAMPLING PROCEDURES

Following the walkthrough, the Inspector collected samples of suspect materials.

EPA guidelines were used to determine the sampling protocol. Sampling locations were chosen to be representative of the homogeneous sampling area. While an effort was made to collect samples randomly, samples were taken preferentially from areas already damaged or areas which were the least visible to minimize disturbance of the material.

Each sample location was sprayed with amended water and was kept wet during the entire sampling process. Samples were collected by coring through the material from the surface down to the base substrate. All layers of the material were extracted in placed into a sample container for transport to the laboratory. Sample containers were sealed and labeled with a unique sample identification number. Where appropriate, sampled materials were sealed with an encapsulant or covered with tape after sampling. PSI is not responsible for restoring the sampled areas to their presampled condition.

In accordance with the agreement between PSI and the client, roofing materials were sampled as part of this survey.

In accordance with the agreement between PSI and the client, roofing materials were sampled by coring through the roof system to the base deck material. PSI did not apply temporary patches to the roof core location following sample collection due to the condition of the roof. Front porch sample location roof is being demolished and house roof sample was taken from a fallen patch of singles.

4.4 ASBESTOS ANALYSIS PROCEDURES

All samples were analyzed at Professional Service Industries, Inc. located at 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220. The PSI Pittsburgh Asbestos Laboratory is a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) Accredited (#101350-0) and an American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Accredited (#8222) Laboratory. A copy of the Laboratory’s Accreditation Certificate is included in Appendix E.

The samples were analyzed for asbestos on a “positive-stop” basis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the “EPA Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials” (EPA/600/R-93/116 July 1993). Analysis was performed by using bulk samples for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples were mounted on slides and then analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, actinolite/tremolite), and fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, fiberglass, cellulose, etc.). Asbestos was identified by refractive indices, morphology, color, pleochroism, birefringence, extinction characteristics, and signs of elongation. The same characteristics were used to identify the non-asbestos constituents.

The microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample, using a stereoscope.

The EPA method allows samples which are visually determined to have 10% or less asbestos to be quantified using a Point Count procedure. An ocular reticule (cross hair or point array) is used to visually superimpose a point or points on the microscope field of view. A total of 400 points superimposed on either asbestos fibers or nonasbestos matrix material must be counted over at least eight different preparations of representative subsamples. If an asbestos fiber and matrix particle overlap so that a point is superimposed on their visual intersection, a point is scored for both categories. Point counting provides a quantification of the area percent asbestos. Two (2) samples were point counted for this survey.

5 FINDINGS

5.1 ASBESTOS RESULTS

A total of 38 samples were collected from 15 suspect homogenous materials during the asbestos survey. In addition, no suspect homogeneous materials were assumed to contain asbestos.

The “Report of Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos”, the “Asbestos Bulk Sample Log”, Sample Location diagram and Photographs are included in the Appendices. The Tables on the following pages list the suspect asbestos-containing materials observed throughout the building. Table 1 lists the materials that were sampled, along with the results of the inspection and laboratory analysis.

Both tables give a description of the materials, their general locations, condition, friability, EPA

NESHAP Category, and estimated quantity, and an estimated cost estimate for abatement.

Inaccessible Areas

The following areas were inaccessible during the survey and therefore were not included in the scope of the survey.

• None

These areas will require an asbestos inspection prior to any demolition or renovation activities within the areas.

Non-Suspect Materials

The following materials were observed but are considered ‘non-suspect’ ACM due to their composition (fiberglass, rubber, etc.) and were not sampled.

• 2’ x 4’ Fiberglass Ceiling Tile – 2nd Floor bedrooms

Regulatory Guidelines

ACM Definition - The EPA & OSHA consider a material to be asbestos-containing if at least one sample from the homogeneous area shows asbestos in an amount greater than 1%.

Point Count Quantification - If a material is found to contain 10% or less asbestos via visual estimation, it can be treated as non asbestos-containing per EPA Regulations, if verified to contain 1% or less asbestos by the Point Count Quantification Procedure. If not point counted, a sample in which asbestos was visually detected and estimated (including trace to ≤1%) must be assumed to be greater than 1% and treated as ACM. Please refer to the laboratory analyses for a more detailed description of the microscopic analysis of individual samples. Two (2) samples were quantified by the Point Count Procedure in this Asbestos Survey.

EPA NESHAP Category - EPA classifies ACM into several categories. A regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) as defined by the Asbestos National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) is any (a) Friable asbestos material, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has becomes friable, (c) Category I non- friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations. A Category I Non-friable ACM includes packings, gaskets, resilient floor covering, and asphalt roofing products which contain more than one percent asbestos. A Category II Non-friable ACM includes any material, except for a Category I non-friable ACM, which contains more than one-percent asbestos and cannot be reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry.

The Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) regulates all asbestos containing materials in quantiles greater than 160 square feet (sf) as RACM; therefore, all ACMs with quantiles greater than 160 sf and all friable materials in any amount must be removed prior to demolition or impacting renovations. Federal, State and Local regulations and guidelines should be strictly adhered to when removing the ACM.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires all suspect materials to be analyzed by layer, even materials such as drywall/joint compound, which may sometimes be composited per the EPA. If any layer contains asbestos in a concentration >1%, the material is considered an ACM.

OSHA has a classification system (I thru IV) for ACM depending on the type of material and the disturbance. Briefly, ‘Class I’ work is defined as activities involving the removal of ACM or presumed ACM (PACM) that is thermal system insulation (TSI) and surfacing materials. ‘Class II’ activities involve removal of ACM/PACM other than TSI or surfacing material. ‘Class III’ work includes repair and maintenance operations which are likely to disturb ACM/PACM, and ‘Class IV’ work includes maintenance and custodial activities during which employees contact but do not disturb ACM/PACM.

Materials where asbestos is detected, but where point counting is conducted and determined that the concentration is ≤1% asbestos, are not considered to be ACM by OSHA. However, these materials are considered unclassified asbestos work per OSHA. Some OSHA work control practices and prohibitions will still apply, with the extent depending on whether the worker's exposure to airborne asbestos exceeds the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL).

Additional details of the OSHA asbestos regulations related to the construction industry can be found in 29 CFR part 1926.1101.

Quantification

Quantification of suspect asbestos-containing materials was conducted using visual estimation by a licensed asbestos inspector. This visual estimation was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the asbestos industry based on materials that were accessible and exposed. These values are sufficiently accurate for the purpose of documenting the presence of asbestos within its space for the purpose of identifying abatement control conditions or for general policy considerations. Actual quantities may differ between visually estimated values and physical measurements. If a licensed asbestos abatement contractor is engaged to remove asbestos containing materials, the abatement contractor is responsible for verifying reported quantities of ACM.

Abatement Cost Estimation

PSI used recognized standard engineering principles in developing the unit cost budgetary estimate for removal of the listed asbestos-containing materials (ACM) contained in this facility.

This is an estimate for removal only, intended for general policy decisions regarding program development and planning. The figures are as of the date of the report and cover only the removal contractor's fees. Not included are items such as indirect or hidden costs, such as employee relocation during the project, lost revenues, replacement costs, project design or monitoring, etc.

These items are considered during the development of an engineering cost estimate, which is beyond the scope of this study. Other variables included in an engineering cost estimate are the project schedule and phasing, size of the project, and other factors that can affect project cost.

TABLE 1 – SUSPECT ACMs - SAMPLED

Lippencott Cottage, #08163361 Survey Date: May 16, 2018

MATERIAL

(# SAMP)

MATERIAL

DESCRIPTION

MATERIAL LOCATION F/NF

COND.

% ACM &

TYPE3

EPA

NESHAP

CAT 4

EST.

QTY.

EST.

REMOVAL

COST

01(2) Exterior Window Caulking

Windows throughout house NF Dam 3% Ch CAT II

NF

Windows

$6,000

02 (2) Exterior Window Glazing

Windows throughout house F Dam 2%Ch Cat II NF 60 Windows

$6,000

03 (9) Plaster, skim and base coat Throughout house F Sig Dam.

Skim – NAD Base – NAD

NA NA NA

04(2) Boiler and duct seam tape Boiler and duct work in basement^^, including around floor registers

F Dam. 60% Ch RACM 120 SF

Soil – 510

SF

$2,400

$10,200

05 (3) Soil Basement (B01) F NA NA NA NA NA

06(2) Drywall & Joint Compound First floor NF Dam. DW – NAD

JC – NAD

NA NA NA

07(2) Debris/ Insulation Throughout house on the floors and inside walls

F Dam. 60% Ch RACM 1,350 SF $27,000

08(2) 12” x 12” Red brick pattern floor tile with yellow mastic

Kitchen (107) NF Sig.

Dam.

FT – 5% Ch

M – NAD

NA NA NA

09(2) 1x1 White ceiling tile Kitchen (107) F Dam. NAD NA NA NA

1 F = Friable; NF = Non-friable 2 Cond. = Condition Of Materials Either good, dam = damaged., sig. dam. = significant damage 3 NAD = No Asbestos Detected, Ch = Chrysotile, Am = Amosite, PT = Point Count Analysis 4 NESHAP Category - Regulated ACM (RACM),Cat I NF=Category I Non-Friable ACBM, Cat II NF= Category II Non-Friable ACBM.

^^ Material was found laying in the soil its recommended to remove the top 1” of soil

TABLE 1 – SUSPECT ACMs – SAMPLED (cont.)

Lippencott Cottage, #08163361 Survey Date: May 16, 2018

MATERIAL

(# SAMP)

MATERIAL

DESCRIPTION

MATERIAL LOCATION F/NF

COND.

% ACM &

TYPE3

EPA

NESHAP

CAT 4

EST.

QTY.

EST.

REMOVAL

COST

10(2) Wood grain sheet flooring Closets of bedroom (204) NF Good. NAD NA NA NA

11(2) Cream sheet flooring Bathroom (205) NF Dam. NAD NA NA NA

12(2) Brown Adhesive Behind wood paneling in rooms 207 and 208

NF Dam NAD NA NA NA

13(2) Roof Flashing Front porch roof NF Dam. 4% Ch CAT I NF 30 LF $500

14(2) Roof shingle over multi-layer tar roof

Front porch roof NF Sig.

Dam.

NAD NA NA NA

15(2) Roof shingle over tar House roof NF Sig.

Dam.

Sh – NAD Tar - <1% Ch

(PT)

NA NA NA

1 F = Friable; NF = Non-friable 2 Cond. = Condition Of Materials Either good, dam = damaged., sig. dam. = significant damage 3 NAD = No Asbestos Detected, Ch = Chrysotile, Am = Amosite, PT = Point Count Analysis 4 NESHAP Category - Regulated ACM (RACM),Cat I NF=Category I Non-Friable ACBM, Cat II NF= Category II Non-Friable ACBM.

6 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 CONCLUSIONS

Asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were found in the Lippencott Cottage.

Assumed ACMs were not found in the Lipencott cottage.

Materials with low concentrations of asbestos (trace to 1%) were identified in the subject facility(s).

The identified or assumed ACMs were observed to be in damaged and significantly damaged condition at the time of the field investigation. The duct seam tape and debris/wall insulation were in significantly damaged condition. The seam tape can be found throughout the basement sitting on top of soil and mixed with other debris. The wall insulation is pieces of insulation packed inside the wall. In certain areas where the plaster wall is damaged there is debris of the insulation found throughout the house. These materials need to be addressed prior to any upcoming renovations.

6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

ACMs should be maintained in a good non-damaged condition and periodically inspected through use of an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) program. Damaged or significantly damaged ACMs should be repaired, encapsulated, enclosed or removed. The duct seam tape found on the ground in the basement is assumed to be mixed in with the top part of the soil. It is recommended that the top 1” of the soil be remediated along with the debris located on the ground.

Regulated ACM (RACM) must be properly removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovations or demolition that would disturb the material. Federal, State and Local regulations and guidelines should be strictly adhered to when removing the ACM.

Category I & II Non-Friable asbestos containing material may often be left in place during demolition if not made friable by cutting, grinding or sanding. If left in place, these materials cannot be recycled, burned or used as clean fill.

Materials verified to contain low concentrations of asbestos (trace to 1%) are not considered ACM, and are not regulated by the EPA; however, some OSHA regulations will still apply based on the employee’s airborne exposure.

Prior to the initiation of a project that would involve abatement, a detailed engineering cost estimate and project design is recommended. The engineering cost estimate will incorporate such variables as scheduling and phasing of the project, the size and extent of the project, seasonal factors, operational factors and other restrictions, respiratory protection, alternate abatement options, and type of replacement material. An engineering cost estimate would also include professional fees, such as for project design and management, and other expenses, such as on-site air monitoring and construction supervision.

APPENDIX A – REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR

ASBESTOS

REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS

TESTED FOR: PSI, Inc.

Historic Preservation Training

Date Received: 5/16/2018 Date Completed: 5/21/2018

850 Poplar Street Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Attn: Doug Finke

Project ID: 08163361

Cottage

Date Reported: 5/21/2018

Page: 1 of 3Analyst: Alexander Edmonds Work Order: 1805463

Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

001AC-01-01 (1) Tan, Caulking, Homogeneous Chrysotile3% None Reported

002AC-01-02 Sample Not Tested

003AC-02-01 (1) Gray, Glazing, Homogeneous Chrysotile2% None Reported

004AC-02-02 Sample Not Tested

005AC-03-01 (1) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Gray, Base Coat, Homogeneous 2% HairNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

006AC-03-02 (1) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

No Base Coat

007AC-03-03 (1) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Gray, Base Coat, Homogeneous 2% HairNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

008AC-03-04 (1) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Gray, Base Coat, Homogeneous 2% HairNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

009AC-03-05 (1) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Gray, Base Coat, Homogeneous 2% HairNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

010AC-03-06 (1) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Gray, Base Coat, Homogeneous 2% HairNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

011AC-03-07 (1) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Gray, Base Coat, Homogeneous 2% HairNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

George Skarupa

Page: 2 of 3Analyst: Alexander Edmonds Work Order: 1805463

Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

012AC-03-08 (1) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Gray, Base Coat, Homogeneous 2% HairNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

013AC-03-09 (1) White, Skim Coat, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Gray, Base Coat, Homogeneous 2% HairNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

014AC-04-01 (1) Gray, Tape, Homogeneous 30% Cellulose Fiber

Chrysotile60%

015AC-04-02 Sample Not Tested

016AC-05-01 (1) Brown, Soil, Homogeneous 2% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

017AC-05-02 (1) Brown, Soil, Homogeneous 2% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

018AC-05-03 (1) Brown, Soil, Homogeneous 2% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

019AC-06-01 (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous 10% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous

NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

020AC-06-02 (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous 10% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous

NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

021AC-07-01 (1) White, Insulation, Homogeneous 30% Cellulose Fiber

Chrysotile60%

022AC-07-02 Sample Not Tested

023AC-08-01 (1) Red, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile5%

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

024AC-08-02 (1) Red, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile5%

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

025AC-09-01 (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 95% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

026AC-09-02 (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 95% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

027AC-10-01 (1) Brown, Flooring, Homogeneous 50% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Transparent, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

028AC-10-02 (1) Brown, Flooring, Homogeneous 50% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

Page: 3 of 3Analyst: Alexander Edmonds Work Order: 1805463

Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

029AC-11-01 (1) Cream, Flooring, Homogeneous 50% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

Inseparable Flooring and Yellow Mastic

030AC-11-02 (1) Cream, Flooring, Homogeneous 50% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

Inseparable Flooring and Yellow Mastic

031AC-12-01 (1) Brown, Adhesive, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

032AC-12-02 (1) Brown, Adhesive, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

033AC-13-01 (1) Black, Flashing, Homogeneous 30% Cellulose Fiber

Chrysotile4%

034AC-13-02 Sample Not Tested

035AC-14-01 (1) Black, Shingle, Homogeneous 20% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Black, Tar, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

036AC-14-02 (1) Black, Shingle, Homogeneous 20% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Black, Tar, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

037AC-15-01 (1) Black, Shingle, Homogeneous 20% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Black, Tar, Homogeneous Chrysotile< 1% None Reported

038AC-15-02 (1) Black, Shingle, Homogeneous 20% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Black, Tar, Homogeneous Chrysotile< 1% None Reported

Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS

TESTED FOR: PSI, Inc.

Historic Preservation Training

Date Received: 5/25/2018 Date Completed: 5/30/2018

850 Poplar Street Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Attn: Doug Finke

Project ID: 08163361

Cottage

Date Reported: 5/31/2018

Original WO#1805463

Page: 1 of 1Analyst: Dan Anderson Work Order: 1805746

Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

001AC-15-01 (1) Black, Tar, Homogeneous < 1% CHRYSOTILE (PT) None Reported

002AC-15-02 (1) Black, Tar, Homogeneous < 1% CHRYSOTILE (PT) None Reported

Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

APPENDIX B – ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE LOG/CHAIN OF CUSTODY

APPENDIX C – SITE LAYOUT AND SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING(S)

SAMPLE LOCATION MAP

DATE PROJ NO.

KEY

Non-Asbestos Containing Material

Asbestos Containing Material

OF-05-01

Asbestos Containing Material

05-03

05-02 05-01

2001840 Text Box 08163361

713185 Callout 04-01

713185 Callout 04-02

Asbestos Containing Material

03-03

06-01

03-02

03-01

06-02

08-01 08-02

09-01 09-02

03-04

2001840 Text Box 08163361

713185 Callout 07-01

713185 Callout 02-01

713185 Callout 01-01

713185

07-02

Asbestos Containing Material

2001840

03-06

2001840 Callout 12-02

2001840 Callout 12-01

2001840 Callout 10-01

2001840 Callout 03-05

2001840 Callout 10-02

2001840 Callout 11-01 11-02

2001840 Callout 13-01 13-02

2001840 Callout 14-01 14-02

2001840 Callout 03-07

2001840 Text Box 08163361

713185 Callout 02-02 01-02

713185 Rectangle

713185 Callout 13-01 13-02

Asbestos Containing Material

2001840

03-08

2001840 Callout 03-09

2001840 Text Box 08163361

Asbestos Containing Material

2O<>i l l i

U zhr v o

2001840 Callout 15-01 15-02

2001840 Text Box 08163361

APPENDIX D – PHOTOLOG

Job No.

Prepared For:

SITE ID:

Lippencott Cottage Material 01- Exterior Window Caulking

Material 02- Exterior window glazing Material 04- Boiler and duct seam tape

Job No.

Prepared For:

SITE ID:

Material 04- Duct seam tape on vent going from basement to first floor

Material 05- Basement soil covered with debris

Material 07- Debris/ Insulation Material 07- Debris/ Insulation throughout walls

APPENDIX E – INSPECTOR AND LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS