Attachment 4 -07 Lead Asbestos Survey.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair HVAC Dormitory B2403 B2404 - DKGV 1073188
- Solicitation number
- FA441822R0003
About this file
This solicitation seeks proposals for HVAC repair services at two dormitory buildings at Joint Base Charleston in South Carolina. The scope of work includes HVAC repairs, exterior wall repairs and modifications, fire alarm system work, and complete removal and replacement of all exterior sealant joints. The project magnitude is estimated between $5 million to $10 million. The NAICS code is 236220 for commercial and institutional building construction, with a size standard of $36.5 million. The solicitation is set aside 100% for SDVOSB firms using trade-off procedures. A site visit is available and described in Section H. The contracting office is the 628th Contracting Squadron. The notice of intent date is not provided but the NTP will be issued within 45 days of award and construction must begin 60 days after NTP. Questions should be directed to the point of contact listed.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADC Project No. 17259 Page 22 March 6,2018
APPENDIX C – ASBESTOS / LEAD SURVEY REPORT
Limited Asbestos and Lead-based Paint Assessment Report
Joint Base Charleston (NWS)- Buildings 2403 to 2406
Goose Creek, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287
Assessment Performed by:
11-6-17
William Seaborn(SCDHEC Accreditation #BI-01317) Date
Report Prepared by:
11-6-17
Don A. Goins (SCDHEC Accreditation #BI-01499) Date
PREPARED FOR:
ADC Engineering
1226 Yeamans Hall Road
Hanahan, SC 29410
PREPARED BY:
S&ME, Inc.
620 Wando Park Boulevard
Mt Pleasant, SC 29464
November 6, 2017
S&ME, Inc. | 620 Wando Park Boulevard | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | p 843.884.0005 | www.smeinc.com
November 6, 2017
ADC Engineering
1226 Yeamans Hall Road
Hanahan, South Carolina 29410
Attention: Ms. Jamie Cox, P.E.
jamiec@adcengineering.com
Reference: Limited Asbestos and Lead-based Paint Assessment Report
Joint Base Charleston- Naval Weapons Station Buildings 2403 to 2406
Dear Ms. Cox:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide the enclosed report detailing the limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment of Buildings 2403, 2404, 2405, and 2406 located at the referenced site. The attached report presents the findings of S&ME’s assessment conducted on October 24 and 25, 2017. The assessment was performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal 42-1701027 dated August 29, 2017 and Design Work Order for Project
Number DKGV 13-2154 dated August 17, 2017. The report includes the executive summary, project background, assessment procedures, findings and results, and conclusions and recommendations for the proper treatment of asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint.
This report is provided for the sole use of ADC Engineering and their assignees. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party's sole risk and S&ME, Inc. disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the assessment and of the specific area referenced. The information provided in this assessment report should not be used as a bidding document, and field conditions should be verified.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene services. If you have any questions concerning this report, please call us at (843) 884-0005.
Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.
Terry W. Richburg James L. Killingsworth, CHMM
Environmental Group Leader Environmental Services Area Manager, V.P.
Attachments mailto:jamiec@adcengineering.com
Joint Base Charleston- Naval Weapons Station- Buildings 2403 to 2406
November 6, 2017 ii
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1.0 Background
2.0 Site and Project Description
2.1 Purpose
2.2 Site Description
3.0 Asbestos Assessment
3.1 Procedures
3.2 Findings and Results
4.0 Lead-based Paint Assessment
4.1 Procedure
4.2 Findings and Results
5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
5.1 Asbestos Recommendations
5.2 Lead-based Paint Recommendations
6.0 Assumptions and Limitations
Appendices Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results
Appendix II– Diagram of Bulk Sample Locations
Appendix III- Copy of Inspector’s SCDHEC License
Appendix IV- Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody Records
Appendix V- Summary of XRF Lead Analyzer Readings
November 6, 2017 1
Executive Summary
A limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was conducted on October 24 and 25, 2017, of Buildings
2403, 2404, 2405, and 2406 located at Joint Base Charleston- Naval Weapons Station in Goose Creek, South
Carolina. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint coatings to be potentially impacted by project number DKGV 13-2154 to support planned repairs to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. Based on the Design Work Order (DWO), the asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was limited to HVAC equipment, mechanical and attic spaces and walls and finishes that might disturbed during the repair and replacement of equipment. The assessment also complies with federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of ACMs that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.
Buildings 2403 to 2406 are three-story buildings with a mechanical mezzanine and each building is approximately
70,000 square feet in size. The buildings are part of the Naval Nuclear Power Training Command (NNPTC) and serve as Bachelors Enlisted Quarters. The buildings were constructed in 1997 and primarily contain living quarters and ancillary program spaces. The exterior finishes of the buildings consist of concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls, brick veneer and a pitched metal roof. The buildings were occupied on the days of our site visits.
Asbestos
The suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed from the specified areas in each of the referenced buildings included drywall and associated joint compound, mastics associated with ductwork, expansion joint, mastics associated with foamglass insulation, and fire stop mastic. Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed as part of this assessment, no ACMs were identified.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) defines a material as ACM if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.
If additional suspect ACMs not addressed in this report are discovered during the planned demolition activities, bulk samples should be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials. This report should also be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.
Lead-based Paint
A lead-based paint assessment was performed of representative painted components associated with project
DKGV 13-2154. The components were analyzed using direct measurement X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology via a Thermo Scientific XLp 302 (serial #25910). For the purpose of this assessment, painted surfaces with lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit (0.7 mg/cm2) are considered lead-based paint.
Of the representative suspect painted components tested, no painted components exhibited lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit of 0.7 mg/cm2. However low levels of lead were present which may be
November 6, 2017 2 applicable to the standards of the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) dependent upon the tasks impacting those surfaces.
Destructive actions to paint containing any level of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) will require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA regulation 29
CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction), including but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.
Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels of lead that cannot be detected by X-ray fluorescence, and may be applicable to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level.
November 6, 2017 3
1.0 Background
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) was contracted by ADC Engineering to perform a limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment of Buildings 2403, 2404, 2405 and 2406 located on Joint Base Charleston (Naval Weapons Station) in
Goose Creek, South Carolina. The assessment was subsequently performed on October 24 and 25, 2017. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint coatings to be potentially impacted by project number DKGV 13-2154 to support planned repairs to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. Based on the Design Work Order (DWO), the asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was limited to HVAC equipment, mechanical and attic spaces and walls and finishes that might disturbed during the repair and replacement of equipment. The assessment also complies with federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of asbestos containing building materials that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.
The asbestos assessment was conducted to assess, sample, and identify ACMs in accordance with regulatory requirements. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40 Code of the
Federal Regulations, part 61, and State regulation 61-86.1 enforced by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), along with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926 enforced by the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The following sections describe the assessment procedures used, results of the suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed, and conclusions and recommendations related to ACMs.
2.0 Site and Project Description
2.1 Purpose
The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint coatings to be potentially impacted by project number DKGV 13-2154 to support planned repairs to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. Based on the Design Work Order (DWO), the asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was limited to HVAC equipment, mechanical and attic spaces and walls and finishes that might disturbed during the repair and replacement of equipment. An assessment strategy appropriate for this purpose was presented in our proposal and is described in this report. The report should be interpreted only with regard to the specific location and materials referenced.
2.2 Site Description
Buildings 2403 to 2406 are three-story buildings with a mechanical mezzanine and each building is approximately
70,000 square feet in size. The buildings are part of the Naval Nuclear Power Training Center (NNPTC) and serve as Bachelors Enlisted Quarters. The buildings were constructed in 1997 and primarily contain living quarters and ancillary program spaces. The exterior finishes of the buildings consist of concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls, brick veneer and a pitched metal roof. The buildings were occupied on the days of our site visits.
November 6, 2017 4
3.0 Asbestos Assessment
3.1 Procedures
The assessment was performed by observing and sampling suspect ACMs that would potentially be impacted during the planned repairs to the HVAC system in each of the referenced buildings. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible areas such as wall voids and flooring overlays. If additional suspect ACMs not identified in this report are discovered during destructive activities, bulk samples should be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials.
A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples in accordance with the SCDHEC and
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector. The bulk samples were then extracted from suspect ACMs and recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to our in-house Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) laboratory. The samples were subsequently analyzed by PLM, and confirmation analysis was performed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) by EMSL
Analytical, for representative non-friable organically bound materials reported negative by PLM. The laboratories are located in Charlotte, North Carolina and both are accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I (1-1-87 edition), Part
763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based on six optical characteristics:
morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of elongation and dispersion staining colors.
The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
Representative suspect non-friable organically bound materials, exhibiting negative results via PLM analysis, were analyzed by trained microscopists via TEM, in accordance with ASTM E2356 per the SCDHEC requirements.
3.2 Findings and Results
The suspect ACMs sampled on October 24 and 25, 2017, from Buildings 2403, 2404, 2405 and 2406 included drywall and associated joint compound, mastics associated with ductwork, expansion joint, mastics associated with foamglass insulation, and fire stop mastic Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed as part of this assessment, no ACMs were identified.
The EPA and the OSHA defines a material an ACM if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.
November 6, 2017 5
A summary of asbestos results is provided in Appendix I, and exhibits the sample number, location, type of material tested, approximate quantity of the material sampled, condition of the material, and corresponding result for each sample. A diagram of the bulk sample locations is provided in Appendix II and a copy of the inspector’s
SCDHEC license is provided in Appendix III. A copy of the laboratory analyses and chain-of-custody records are provided in Attachment IV.
4.0 Lead-based Paint Assessment
4.1 Procedure
Lead-based paint testing was performed on representative painted components associated with project DKGV 13-
2154. The components were analyzed with a Thermo Scientific XLp-302 XRF spectrum analyzer (serial #25910).
The suspect painted finishes were selected based on the color of the topcoat and the underlying paint layers and/or the substrate on which it was applied. The possibility exists that lead-based paint finishes are present in those inaccessible areas such as pipe chases, wall voids, etc. The SCDHEC defines a lead-based paint as any paint containing lead at concentrations equaling 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater by XRF testing. For the purpose of the assessment, paint containing 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater was considered lead-based paint due to the planned renovation activities.
The OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the airborne concentration of lead a worker is exposed. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) during an eight-hour day and a permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m3.
4.2 Findings and Results
Based on the assessment and testing performed on October 24 and 25, 2017, of the painted components associated with the specified areas of the referenced buildings, no components exhibited lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC limit of 0.7 mg/cm2. However low levels of lead were present which may be applicable to the standards of the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) dependent upon the tasks impacting those surfaces.
The summary of XRF readings is provided in Appendix V, and should be reviewed in full.
5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
The limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment performed on October 24 and 25, 2017, of Buildings 2403, 2404. 2405, and 2406 located on Joint Base Charleston- Naval Weapons Station in Goose Creek, South Carolina, did not identify ACMs or lead-based paint applicable to the SCDHEC disposal limits. However low levels of lead were identified that may be applicable to the standards of the OSHA. This report should be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.
November 6, 2017 6
5.1 Asbestos Recommendations
If additional suspect materials not addressed in this report are discovered during the destructive work activities, work impacting those suspect materials must cease and bulk samples should be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content. An application for demolition, along with a copy of this report, must be submitted to the SCDHEC 10-weekdays prior to demolition activities.
5.2 Lead-based Paint Recommendations
Destructive actions to paint containing any level of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) will require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA regulation 29
CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction), including but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.
Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels of lead that cannot be detected by X-ray fluorescence, and may be applicable to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level.
6.0 Assumptions and Limitations
This report is provided for the sole use of the Client. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party’s sole risk, and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling period and of the specific areas referenced. Under no circumstances is this report to be used as a bidding document, or as a project design or specification.
S&ME performed the services in accordance with generally accepted practices of reputable environmental consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. S&ME has endeavored to meet this standard of care. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is intended or made with respect to this report or S&ME’s services. Users of this report should consider the scope and limitations related to these services when developing opinions as to risks associated with the site.
The findings of the asbestos and lead-based paint assessment were based largely on visual observations within the amount of time available. The findings do not warrant that all asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint have been identified; asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint could be present in areas not readily-accessible to observation. In addition, the actual locations and quantities of materials determined to contain asbestos may vary from those herein. Apparent homogeneous sampling areas may vary in actual asbestos content due to previous renovations, maintenance or related operations. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible or concealed areas such as under carpeting or multiple flooring layers, and inside pipe chases or wall voids. If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples must be collected by an asbestos inspector and analyzed for asbestos content.
Appendices
Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results
Summary of Asbestos Results
JBC-NWS
Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406
Goose Creek, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287
Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017
HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.
Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type
Condition/
Potential for
Disturbance
Sample Number Sample Location
Type and
Percent
Asbestos
2403-DW-1 Attic-Wing B ND
2403-DW-2 Attic- Wing A ND
2403-DW-3 Attic- Wing C ND
2403-JC-01 Attic-Wing B ND
2403-JC-02 Attic-Wing B ND
2403-JC-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2403-JC-04 Attic- Wing D ND
2403-JC-05 Attic- Wing C ND
2403-JC-06 Attic- Wing A ND
2403-JC-07 Attic- Wing A ND
2403-DM1-01 Attic-Wing B ND
2403-DM1-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2403-DM1-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2403-DM2-01 Attic-Wing B ND
2403-DM2-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2403-DM2-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2403-EJ-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2403-EJ-02 Attic- Wing D ND
2403-EJ-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2403-FGM-01 Attic- Wing B ND
2403-FGM-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2403-FGM-03 Attic- Wing C ND
2403-FGM2-01 Attic-Wing D ND
2403-FGM2-02 Attic- Wing D ND
2403-FGM2-03 Attic- Wing A ND
Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results
Misc. NADW Drywall NA
Building 2403- Nimitz Hall
NA Surf. NAJC Joint Compound
Walls in the attic 5,500 F
Misc. NA
DM2
Mastic (grey) associated with ductwork
On ductwork in the attic 5,040 SF NA Misc. NA
DM1
Mastic (beige) associatd with ductwork
On ductwork in the attic
15,750 SF NA
Misc. NA
FGM2
Mastic (brown) associated with foamglass insulation
On piping in the attic 260 CF NA Misc. NA
FGM
Mastic (white) associated with foamglass insulation On piping in the attic 282 CF NA
EJ Expansion joint (black) On air handling units in the attic 8 SF NA Misc. NA
Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406
Goose Creek, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287
Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017
HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.
Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type
Condition/
Potential for
Disturbance
Sample Number Sample Location
Type and
Percent
Asbestos
Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results
2403-FS-01 Attic- Wing B ND
2403-FS-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2403-FS-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2404-DW-01 Attic-Wing D ND
2404-DW-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2404-DW-03 Attic- Wing A ND
2404-JC-01 Attic-Wing D ND
2404-JC-02 Attic-Wing D ND
2404-JC-03 Attic- Wing C ND
2404-JC-04 Attic- Wing B ND
2404-JC-05 Attic- Wing B ND
2404-JC-06 Attic- Wing A ND
2404-JC-07 Attic- Wing A ND
2404-DM1-01 Attic-Wing D ND
2404-DM1-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2404-DM1-03 Attic- Wing A ND
2404-DM2-01 Attic-Wing B ND
2404-DM2-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2404-DM2-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2404-EJ-01 Attic-Wing D ND
2404-EJ-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2404-EJ-03 Attic- Wing A ND
2404-FGM-01 Attic- Wing C ND
2404-FGM-02 Attic- Wing D ND
2404-FGM-03 Attic- Wing A ND
Mastic (beige) associatd with ductwork
On ductwork in the attic
15,750 SF NA
Misc. NA
DW Drywall
Walls 5,500 F
NA Misc. NA
JC Joint Compound NA Surf. NA
FS Fire stop mastic (red) Ceiling to the attic 12 SF NA
Building 2404- Seawolf Hall
EJ Expansion joint (black) On air handling units in the attic 8 SF NA Misc.
Misc. NA
DM2
Mastic (grey) associated with ductwork
On ductwork in the attic 5,040 Sf NA Misc. NA
DM1
NA
Misc. NAFGM Mastic (white) associated with foamglass insulation On piping in the attic 130 CF NA
Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406
Goose Creek, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287
Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017
HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.
Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type
Condition/
Potential for
Disturbance
Sample Number Sample Location
Type and
Percent
Asbestos
Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results
2404-FGM2-01 Attic- Wing C ND
2404-FGM2-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2404-FGM2-03 Attic- Wing C ND
2404-FGM3-01 Attic- Wing B ND
2404-FGM3-02 Attic- Wing B ND
2404-FGM3-03 Attic- Wing B ND
2405-DW-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2405-DW-02 Attic- Wing B ND
2405-DW-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2405-JC-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2405-JC-02 Attic-Wing A ND
2405-JC-03 Attic- Wing B ND
2405-JC-04 Attic- Wing C ND
2405-JC-05 Attic- Wing C ND
2405-JC-06 Attic- Wing D ND
2405-JC-07 Attic- Wing D ND
2405-DM1-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2405-DM1-02 Attic-Wing B ND
2405-DM1-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2405-DM2-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2405-DM2-02 Attic-Wing B ND
2405-DM2-03 Attic- Wing C ND
2405-EJ-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2405-EJ-02 Attic-Wing B ND
2405-EJ-03 Attic- Wing C ND
Building 2405- Trident Hall
DW Drywall
Walls 5,500 F
NA Misc. NA
JC Joint Compound NA Surf. NA
Misc. NAFGM3 Mastic (black) associated with foamglass insulation On piping in the attic 130 CF NA
FGM2
Mastic (brown) associated with foamglass insulation
On piping in the attic 282 CF NA Misc. NA
Misc. NA
DM2
Mastic (grey) associated with ductwork
On ductwork in the attic 5,040 SF NA Misc. NA
DM1
Mastic (beige) associatd with ductwork
On ductwork in the attic
15,750 SF NA
Misc. NAEJ Expansion joint (black) On air handling units in the attic
8 SF NA
Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406
Goose Creek, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287
Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017
HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.
Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type
Condition/
Potential for
Disturbance
Sample Number Sample Location
Type and
Percent
Asbestos
Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results
2405-FGM2-01 Attic- Wing A ND
2405-FGM2-02 Attic- Wing B ND
2405-FGM2-03 Attic- Wing C ND
2406-DW-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2406-DW-02 Attic- Wing B ND
2406-DW-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2406-JC-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2406-JC-02 Attic-Wing A ND
2406-JC-03 Attic- Wing B ND
2406-JC-04 Attic- Wing B ND
2406-JC-05 Attic- Wing C ND
2406-JC-06 Attic- Wing C ND
2406-JC-07 Attic- Wing D ND
2406-DM1-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2406-DM1-02 Attic-Wing C ND
2406-DM1-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2406-DM2-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2406-DM2-02 Attic-Wing C ND
2406-DM2-03 Attic- Wing D ND
FGM2
Mastic (brown) associated with foamglass insulation
On piping in the attic 130 CF NA Misc. NA
NA
JC Joint Compound NA Surf. NA
Building 2406- Skipjack Hall
DW Drywall
Walls 5,500 F
NA Misc.
Misc. NA
DM2
Mastic (grey) associated with ductwork
On ductwork in the attic 5,040 SF NA Misc. NA
DM1
Mastic (beige) associatd with ductwork
On ductwork in the attic
15,750 SF NA
Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406
Goose Creek, South Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287
Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017
HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.
Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type
Condition/
Potential for
Disturbance
Sample Number Sample Location
Type and
Percent
Asbestos
Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results
2406-EJ-01 Attic-Wing A ND
2406-EJ-02 Attic-Wing B ND
2406-EJ-03 Attic- Wing D ND
2406-FGM2-01 Attic- Wing A ND
2406-FGM2-02 Attic- Wing C ND
2406-FGM2-03 Attic- Wing D ND
ND = No Asbestos Detected LPD = low potential for disturbance G = good F= friable Misc = miscellaneous
NA = Not Applicable PD = potential for disturbance D = damaged NF = non-friable Surf = surfacing
SF = square feet PSD = potential for significant disturbance SD = significantly damaged EA = each TSI = thermal system insulation
CF = cubic feet HA = homogeneous area Cat. I = category I Cat. II = category II
EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA defines a material as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.
Quantities are estimated, and should not be used for bidding purposes, as field conditions should be verified.
Samples analyzed by TEM to confirm negative results reported by PLM analysis.
Misc. NA
FGM2
Mastic (brown) associated with foamglass insulation
On piping in the attic 542 CF NA TSI NA
EJ Expansion joint (black) On air handling units in the attic
8 SF NA
Appendix II– Diagram of Bulk Sample Locations
NOTES: BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE BULK SAMPLES
COLLECTED AND ANALYZED, NO ASBESTOS WAS
DETECTED.
NO PAINTED SURFACES MEETING THE SCDHEC
DISPOSAL LIMIT OF 0.7 mg/cm² WERE DETECTED.
WING D
WING B
WING C
WING A
LEGEND
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
2403-JC-04
2403-DM1-03
2403-DM2-03
2403-EJ-03
2403-FGM2-01
2403-FGM2-02
2403-FS-03
2403-JC-03
2403-DW-02
2403-FS-02
2403-EJ-02
2403-DM2-02
2403-FGM-02
2403-FGM-03
2403-DM1-02
2403-DW-03
2403-JC-05
2403-DM2-01
2403-EJ-01
2403-FGM-01
2403-DM1-01
2403-JC-02
2403-DW-01
2403-JC-01
2403-JC-07
2403-JC-06
2403-FS-01
2403-FGM2-03
2403-XX-XX
FIGURE NO.
D r a w i n g p a t h
Q d r a w i n g s
J B
C d w g
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE:
SCALE:
0 50 100
(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE
L I M
I T
E D
A
S B
E S
T O
S
A
N
L
A
D B
A S
P
I N
T
A
S S
E S
S M
E N
T
B U
I L D
I N
G
N
I M
I T Z
H
L L
J O
I N
T
B
A S E
C
H A
R L E S T O
N
N
N P
T C
G O
O S E
C
R E E K
S O
U
C
R
O L I N
A
11-02-2017
1" = 50'
4213-17-287
2404-FGM3-01
2404-DW-02
2404-JC-03
2404-DW-01
2404-JC-01
2404-FGM-01
2404-DM2-01
2404-FGM-02
2404-FGM2-02
2424-FGM2-03
2404-DM1-02
2404-DM2-02
2404-EJ-02
2404-FGM2-01
2404-DM2-03
2404-JC-05
2404-JC-04
2404-EJ-03
2404-JC-06
2404-FGM-03
2404-DM1-03
2404-JC-07
2404-DW-03
2404-EJ-01
2404-JC-02
WING D
WING B
WING C
WING A
LEGEND
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
2404-XX-XX
2404-FGM3-02
2404-FGM3-03
2404-DM1-01
NOTES: BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE BULK SAMPLES
COLLECTED AND ANALYZED, NO ASBESTOS WAS
DETECTED.
NO PAINTED SURFACES MEETING THE SCDHEC
DISPOSAL LIMIT OF 0.7 mg/cm² WERE DETECTED.
FIGURE NO.
D r a w i n g p a t h
Q d r a w i n g s
J B
C d w g
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE:
SCALE:
0 50 100
(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE
L I M
I T
B
E S
T O
S
A
A
D B
A S
I N
T
A
S S
E S
S M
E N
T
B U
I L D
I N
G
S E A
W O
L F
H
A L L
J O
I N
T
B
A S E
C
H A
R L E S T O
N
N
N P
T C
G O
O S E
C
R E E K
S O
U
R
O L I N
A
11-02-2017
1" = 50'
WING D
WING B
WING C
WING A
2405-EJ-02
2405-DM1-03
2405-JC-07
2405-FGM-01
2405-FGM-02
2405-FGM-03
2405-FGM2-03
2405-DM2-03
2405-EJ-03
2405-JC-04
2405-JC-05
2405-DW-03
2405-JC-06
2405-DM2-02
2405-JC-03
2405-DM1-02
2405-DW-02
2405-FGM2-02
2405-DW-01
2405-JC-01
2405-FGM2-01
2405-DM2-01
2405-EJ-01
2405-DM1-01
LEGEND
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
2405-XX-XX
2405-JC-02
NOTES: BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE BULK SAMPLES
COLLECTED AND ANALYZED, NO ASBESTOS WAS
DETECTED.
NO PAINTED SURFACES MEETING THE SCDHEC
DISPOSAL LIMIT OF 0.7 mg/cm² WERE DETECTED.
FIGURE NO.
D r a w i n g p a t h
Q d r a w i n g s
J B
C d w g
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE:
SCALE:
0 50 100
(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE
L I M
I T
B
E S
T O
S
A
A
D B
A S
I N
T
A
S S
E S
S M
E N
T
B U
I L D
I N
G
T R
I D
E N
T
H
A L L
J O
I N
T
B
A S E
C
H A
R L E S T O
N
N
N P
T C
G O
O S E
C
R E E K
S O
U
R
O L I N
A
11-02-2017
1" = 50'
WING D
WING B
WING C
WING A
2406-JC-04
2406-DW-02
2406-FGM2-03
2406-DM2-03
2406-EJ-03
2406-DM1-03
2406-JC-07
2406-JC-05
2406-DM1-02
2406-DM2-02
2406-JC-06
2406-DW-03
2406-JC-03
2406-FGM2-02
2406-EJ-02
2406-EJ-01
2406-DM2-01
2406-FGM2-01
2406-DM1-01
2406-JC-02
2406-JC-01
2406-DW-01
LEGEND
BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
2406-XX-XX
NOTES: BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE BULK SAMPLES
COLLECTED AND ANALYZED, NO ASBESTOS WAS
DETECTED.
NO PAINTED SURFACES MEETING THE SCDHEC
DISPOSAL LIMIT OF 0.7 mg/cm² WERE DETECTED.
FIGURE NO.
D r a w i n g p a t h
Q d r a w i n g s
J B
C d w g
PROJECT NUMBER
DATE:
SCALE:
0 50 100
(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE
L I M
I T
B
E S
T O
S
A
A
D B
A S
I N
T
A
S S
E S
S M
E N
T
B U
I L D
I N
G
S K
I P
J A
K
L L
J O
I N
T
B
A S E
C
H A
R L E S T O
N
N
N P
T C
G O
O S E
C
R E E K
S O
U
R
O L I N
A
11-02-2017
1" = 50'
Appendix III- Copy of Inspector’s SCDHEC License
South Carolina
Department of Health and Environmental Control
Asbestos License
William Seaborn
Air Sampler AS-00416
Building Inspector BI-01317
S&ME, INC. / 620 Wando Park Blvd. / Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 / p 843.884.0005 / f 843.881.6149 / www.smeinc.com http://www.smeinc.com/
Appendix IV- Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody
Records
Charleston Branch 620 Wando Park Blvd.
Mt. Pleasant SC 29464
Asbestos Analysis Summary
Client Job
Client Name
Date Analyzed
Date Received
10/31/2017
10/26/2017
ADC JBC Bldg 2403 Nimitz Hall
9771D Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929
NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0
POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
5 CELLULOSE
2 GLASS
93 GYPSUM17-10056 2403-DW-01 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND
5 CELLULOSE
2 GLASS
93 GYPSUM17-10057 2403-DW-02 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND
5 CELLULOSE
2 GLASS
93 GYPSUM17-10058 2403-DW-03 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10059 2403-JC-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane Wasilewski Laboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-10060 2403-JC-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10061 2403-JC-03 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10062 2403-JC-04 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10063 2403-JC-05 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10064 2403-JC-06 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10065 2403-JC-07 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-10066 2403-DM1-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10067 2403-DM1-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10069 2403-DM2-01 GREY PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10070 2403-DM2-02 GREY PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10072 2403-FGM-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10073 2403-FGM-02 WHITE PLIABLE ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-10075 2403-FGM2-01 TAN/GREY NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10076 2403-FGM2-02 TAN/GREY NONFIBROUS ND
2 CELLULOSE
<1 GLASS
98 OTHER
<1 PERLITE
17-10078 2403-FS-01 RED/GREY FIBROUS ND
3 CELLULOSE
1 GLASS
95 OTHER
1 PERLITE
17-10079 2403-FS-02 RED FIBROUS ND
75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10081 2403-EJ-01 BLACK FIBROUS ND
75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10082 2403-EJ-02 BLACK FIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10083 2403-EJ-03 BLACK FIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Asbestos Analysis Summary
Client Job
Client Name
Date Analyzed
Date Received
10/31/2017
10/26/2017
ADC JBC Bldg 2404 Sea Wolf Hall
9771D Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929
NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0
POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
5 CELLULOSE
2 GLASS
93 GYPSUM17-10084 2404-DW-01 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND
5 CELLULOSE
2 GLASS
93 GYPSUM17-10085 2404-DW-02 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND
2 GLASS 98 GYPSUM17-10086 2404-DW-03 BEIGE FIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10087 2404-JC-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-10088 2404-JC-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10089 2404-JC-03 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10090 2404-JC-04 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10091 2404-JC-05 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10092 2404-JC-06 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10093 2404-JC-07 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-10094 2404-DM1-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10095 2404-DM1-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10097 2404-DM2-01 GREY PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10098 2404-DM2-02 GREY PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10100 2404-FGM-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10101 2404-FGM-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-10103 2404-FGM2-01 YW/GREY NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10104 2404-FGM2-02 YW/GREY NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10106 2404-FGM3-01 BLACK NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10107 2404-FGM3-02 BLACK NONFIBROUS ND
75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10109 2404-EJ-01 BLACK FIBROUS ND
75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10110 2404-EJ-02 BLACK FIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10111 2404-EJ-03 BLACK FIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Asbestos Analysis Summary
Client Job
Client Name
Date Analyzed
Date Received
10/31/2017
10/26/2017
ADC JBC Bldg 2405 Trident Hall
9771D Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929
NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0
POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method
Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
5 CELLULOSE
2 GLASS
93 GYPSUM17-10112 2405-DW-01 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND
2 GLASS
<1 CELLULOSE
98 GYPSUM17-10113 2405-DW-02 BEIGE FIBROUS ND
5 CELLULOSE
2 GLASS
93 GYPSUM17-10114 2405-DW-03 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10115 2405-JC-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-10116 2405-JC-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10117 2405-JC-03 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10118 2405-JC-04 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10119 2405-JC-05 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10120 2405-JC-06 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10121 2405-JC-07 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
100 OTHER17-10122 2405-DM1-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10123 2405-DM1-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10125 2405-DM2-01 GREY PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10126 2405-DM2-02 GREY PLIABLE ND
100 OTHER17-10128 2405-FGM2-01 YELLOW NONFIBROUS ND
100 OTHER17-10129 2405-FGM2-02 YW/GREY NONFIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not
Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.
The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)
(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.
Job Number 4213-17-287
Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type
75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10131 2405-EJ-01 BLACK FIBROUS ND
75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10132 2405-EJ-02 BLACK FIBROUS ND
75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10133 2405-EJ-03 BLACK FIBROUS ND
For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .