Attachment 4 -07 Lead Asbestos Survey.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
Repair HVAC Dormitory B2403 B2404 - DKGV 1073188
Solicitation number
FA441822R0003
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation seeks proposals for HVAC repair services at two dormitory buildings at Joint Base Charleston in South Carolina. The scope of work includes HVAC repairs, exterior wall repairs and modifications, fire alarm system work, and complete removal and replacement of all exterior sealant joints. The project magnitude is estimated between $5 million to $10 million. The NAICS code is 236220 for commercial and institutional building construction, with a size standard of $36.5 million. The solicitation is set aside 100% for SDVOSB firms using trade-off procedures. A site visit is available and described in Section H. The contracting office is the 628th Contracting Squadron. The notice of intent date is not provided but the NTP will be issued within 45 days of award and construction must begin 60 days after NTP. Questions should be directed to the point of contact listed.

View the file

Other files

Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ADC Project No. 17259 Page 22 March 6,2018

APPENDIX C – ASBESTOS / LEAD SURVEY REPORT

Limited Asbestos and Lead-based Paint Assessment Report

Joint Base Charleston (NWS)- Buildings 2403 to 2406

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287

Assessment Performed by:

11-6-17

William Seaborn(SCDHEC Accreditation #BI-01317) Date

Report Prepared by:

11-6-17

Don A. Goins (SCDHEC Accreditation #BI-01499) Date

PREPARED FOR:

ADC Engineering

1226 Yeamans Hall Road

Hanahan, SC 29410

PREPARED BY:

S&ME, Inc.

620 Wando Park Boulevard

Mt Pleasant, SC 29464

November 6, 2017

S&ME, Inc. | 620 Wando Park Boulevard | Mt Pleasant, SC 29464 | p 843.884.0005 | www.smeinc.com

November 6, 2017

ADC Engineering

1226 Yeamans Hall Road

Hanahan, South Carolina 29410

Attention: Ms. Jamie Cox, P.E.

jamiec@adcengineering.com

Reference: Limited Asbestos and Lead-based Paint Assessment Report

Joint Base Charleston- Naval Weapons Station Buildings 2403 to 2406

Dear Ms. Cox:

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to provide the enclosed report detailing the limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment of Buildings 2403, 2404, 2405, and 2406 located at the referenced site. The attached report presents the findings of S&ME’s assessment conducted on October 24 and 25, 2017. The assessment was performed in general accordance with S&ME Proposal 42-1701027 dated August 29, 2017 and Design Work Order for Project

Number DKGV 13-2154 dated August 17, 2017. The report includes the executive summary, project background, assessment procedures, findings and results, and conclusions and recommendations for the proper treatment of asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint.

This report is provided for the sole use of ADC Engineering and their assignees. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party's sole risk and S&ME, Inc. disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the assessment and of the specific area referenced. The information provided in this assessment report should not be used as a bidding document, and field conditions should be verified.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our industrial hygiene services. If you have any questions concerning this report, please call us at (843) 884-0005.

Sincerely, S&ME, Inc.

Terry W. Richburg James L. Killingsworth, CHMM

Environmental Group Leader Environmental Services Area Manager, V.P.

Attachments mailto:jamiec@adcengineering.com

Joint Base Charleston- Naval Weapons Station- Buildings 2403 to 2406

November 6, 2017 ii

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

1.0 Background

2.0 Site and Project Description

2.1 Purpose

2.2 Site Description

3.0 Asbestos Assessment

3.1 Procedures

3.2 Findings and Results

4.0 Lead-based Paint Assessment

4.1 Procedure

4.2 Findings and Results

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

5.1 Asbestos Recommendations

5.2 Lead-based Paint Recommendations

6.0 Assumptions and Limitations

Appendices Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results

Appendix II– Diagram of Bulk Sample Locations

Appendix III- Copy of Inspector’s SCDHEC License

Appendix IV- Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody Records

Appendix V- Summary of XRF Lead Analyzer Readings

November 6, 2017 1

Executive Summary

A limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was conducted on October 24 and 25, 2017, of Buildings

2403, 2404, 2405, and 2406 located at Joint Base Charleston- Naval Weapons Station in Goose Creek, South

Carolina. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint coatings to be potentially impacted by project number DKGV 13-2154 to support planned repairs to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. Based on the Design Work Order (DWO), the asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was limited to HVAC equipment, mechanical and attic spaces and walls and finishes that might disturbed during the repair and replacement of equipment. The assessment also complies with federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of ACMs that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.

Buildings 2403 to 2406 are three-story buildings with a mechanical mezzanine and each building is approximately

70,000 square feet in size. The buildings are part of the Naval Nuclear Power Training Command (NNPTC) and serve as Bachelors Enlisted Quarters. The buildings were constructed in 1997 and primarily contain living quarters and ancillary program spaces. The exterior finishes of the buildings consist of concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls, brick veneer and a pitched metal roof. The buildings were occupied on the days of our site visits.

Asbestos

The suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed from the specified areas in each of the referenced buildings included drywall and associated joint compound, mastics associated with ductwork, expansion joint, mastics associated with foamglass insulation, and fire stop mastic. Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed as part of this assessment, no ACMs were identified.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) defines a material as ACM if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

If additional suspect ACMs not addressed in this report are discovered during the planned demolition activities, bulk samples should be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials. This report should also be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

Lead-based Paint

A lead-based paint assessment was performed of representative painted components associated with project

DKGV 13-2154. The components were analyzed using direct measurement X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) technology via a Thermo Scientific XLp 302 (serial #25910). For the purpose of this assessment, painted surfaces with lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit (0.7 mg/cm2) are considered lead-based paint.

Of the representative suspect painted components tested, no painted components exhibited lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC disposal limit of 0.7 mg/cm2. However low levels of lead were present which may be

November 6, 2017 2 applicable to the standards of the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) dependent upon the tasks impacting those surfaces.

Destructive actions to paint containing any level of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) will require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA regulation 29

CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction), including but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.

Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels of lead that cannot be detected by X-ray fluorescence, and may be applicable to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level.

November 6, 2017 3

1.0 Background

S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) was contracted by ADC Engineering to perform a limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment of Buildings 2403, 2404, 2405 and 2406 located on Joint Base Charleston (Naval Weapons Station) in

Goose Creek, South Carolina. The assessment was subsequently performed on October 24 and 25, 2017. The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint coatings to be potentially impacted by project number DKGV 13-2154 to support planned repairs to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. Based on the Design Work Order (DWO), the asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was limited to HVAC equipment, mechanical and attic spaces and walls and finishes that might disturbed during the repair and replacement of equipment. The assessment also complies with federal, state, and local asbestos requirements regarding identification of asbestos containing building materials that may be disturbed due to renovation or demolition.

The asbestos assessment was conducted to assess, sample, and identify ACMs in accordance with regulatory requirements. The identification of ACMs will aid in the prevention of occupational exposures and/or environmental releases of airborne asbestos. Identification of ACMs also complies with Title 40 Code of the

Federal Regulations, part 61, and State regulation 61-86.1 enforced by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), along with Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations, part 1926 enforced by the

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The following sections describe the assessment procedures used, results of the suspect ACMs sampled and analyzed, and conclusions and recommendations related to ACMs.

2.0 Site and Project Description

2.1 Purpose

The purpose of the assessment was to identify the presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint coatings to be potentially impacted by project number DKGV 13-2154 to support planned repairs to the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. Based on the Design Work Order (DWO), the asbestos and lead-based paint assessment was limited to HVAC equipment, mechanical and attic spaces and walls and finishes that might disturbed during the repair and replacement of equipment. An assessment strategy appropriate for this purpose was presented in our proposal and is described in this report. The report should be interpreted only with regard to the specific location and materials referenced.

2.2 Site Description

Buildings 2403 to 2406 are three-story buildings with a mechanical mezzanine and each building is approximately

70,000 square feet in size. The buildings are part of the Naval Nuclear Power Training Center (NNPTC) and serve as Bachelors Enlisted Quarters. The buildings were constructed in 1997 and primarily contain living quarters and ancillary program spaces. The exterior finishes of the buildings consist of concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls, brick veneer and a pitched metal roof. The buildings were occupied on the days of our site visits.

November 6, 2017 4

3.0 Asbestos Assessment

3.1 Procedures

The assessment was performed by observing and sampling suspect ACMs that would potentially be impacted during the planned repairs to the HVAC system in each of the referenced buildings. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible areas such as wall voids and flooring overlays. If additional suspect ACMs not identified in this report are discovered during destructive activities, bulk samples should be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content prior to disturbance or disposal of the suspect materials.

A sampling strategy was developed to provide representative samples in accordance with the SCDHEC and

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Bulk samples of suspect ACMs were collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector. The bulk samples were then extracted from suspect ACMs and recorded on a chain of custody record and submitted to our in-house Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) laboratory. The samples were subsequently analyzed by PLM, and confirmation analysis was performed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) by EMSL

Analytical, for representative non-friable organically bound materials reported negative by PLM. The laboratories are located in Charlotte, North Carolina and both are accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory

Accreditation Program (NVLAP), which is administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

The suspect materials were analyzed by trained microscopists using PLM techniques coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Test Method Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I (1-1-87 edition), Part

763, Subpart F-APPENDIX A. This method identifies asbestos mineral fibers based on six optical characteristics:

morphology, birefringence, refractive index, extinction angle, sign of elongation and dispersion staining colors.

The laboratory analysis reports the specific type of asbestos identified (there are six asbestos minerals) and the percentage of asbestos present.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Representative suspect non-friable organically bound materials, exhibiting negative results via PLM analysis, were analyzed by trained microscopists via TEM, in accordance with ASTM E2356 per the SCDHEC requirements.

3.2 Findings and Results

The suspect ACMs sampled on October 24 and 25, 2017, from Buildings 2403, 2404, 2405 and 2406 included drywall and associated joint compound, mastics associated with ductwork, expansion joint, mastics associated with foamglass insulation, and fire stop mastic Of the representative materials sampled and analyzed as part of this assessment, no ACMs were identified.

The EPA and the OSHA defines a material an ACM if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

November 6, 2017 5

A summary of asbestos results is provided in Appendix I, and exhibits the sample number, location, type of material tested, approximate quantity of the material sampled, condition of the material, and corresponding result for each sample. A diagram of the bulk sample locations is provided in Appendix II and a copy of the inspector’s

SCDHEC license is provided in Appendix III. A copy of the laboratory analyses and chain-of-custody records are provided in Attachment IV.

4.0 Lead-based Paint Assessment

4.1 Procedure

Lead-based paint testing was performed on representative painted components associated with project DKGV 13-

2154. The components were analyzed with a Thermo Scientific XLp-302 XRF spectrum analyzer (serial #25910).

The suspect painted finishes were selected based on the color of the topcoat and the underlying paint layers and/or the substrate on which it was applied. The possibility exists that lead-based paint finishes are present in those inaccessible areas such as pipe chases, wall voids, etc. The SCDHEC defines a lead-based paint as any paint containing lead at concentrations equaling 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater by XRF testing. For the purpose of the assessment, paint containing 0.7 mg/cm2 or greater was considered lead-based paint due to the planned renovation activities.

The OSHA does not recognize a threshold level of lead for definition purposes, only the airborne concentration of lead a worker is exposed. The current OSHA regulations recognize an airborne action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) during an eight-hour day and a permissible exposure limit of 50 µg/m3.

4.2 Findings and Results

Based on the assessment and testing performed on October 24 and 25, 2017, of the painted components associated with the specified areas of the referenced buildings, no components exhibited lead concentrations meeting the SCDHEC limit of 0.7 mg/cm2. However low levels of lead were present which may be applicable to the standards of the OSHA 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction) dependent upon the tasks impacting those surfaces.

The summary of XRF readings is provided in Appendix V, and should be reviewed in full.

5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

The limited asbestos and lead-based paint assessment performed on October 24 and 25, 2017, of Buildings 2403, 2404. 2405, and 2406 located on Joint Base Charleston- Naval Weapons Station in Goose Creek, South Carolina, did not identify ACMs or lead-based paint applicable to the SCDHEC disposal limits. However low levels of lead were identified that may be applicable to the standards of the OSHA. This report should be provided to the contractor(s) to assist with compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations.

November 6, 2017 6

5.1 Asbestos Recommendations

If additional suspect materials not addressed in this report are discovered during the destructive work activities, work impacting those suspect materials must cease and bulk samples should be collected by a SCDHEC licensed inspector and analyzed for asbestos content. An application for demolition, along with a copy of this report, must be submitted to the SCDHEC 10-weekdays prior to demolition activities.

5.2 Lead-based Paint Recommendations

Destructive actions to paint containing any level of lead (e.g. component removal, demolition, sanding, grinding, burning, paint preparation, etc.) will require the contractor comply with the standards of the OSHA regulation 29

CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction), including but not limited to training, initial exposure monitoring, the use of personal protective equipment, and medical surveillance.

Paint coatings may be present that contain low levels of lead that cannot be detected by X-ray fluorescence, and may be applicable to OSHA regulations 29 CFR 1926.62. The quantities reported by XRF may be useful in determining the relative risk associated with various demolition tasks, for example disturbances to paints with low lead levels may be less likely to result in airborne lead exposures in excess of the OSHA Action Level.

6.0 Assumptions and Limitations

This report is provided for the sole use of the Client. Use of this report by any other parties will be at such party’s sole risk, and S&ME disclaims liability for any such use or reliance by third parties. The results presented in this report are indicative of conditions only during the time of the sampling period and of the specific areas referenced. Under no circumstances is this report to be used as a bidding document, or as a project design or specification.

S&ME performed the services in accordance with generally accepted practices of reputable environmental consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. S&ME has endeavored to meet this standard of care. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is intended or made with respect to this report or S&ME’s services. Users of this report should consider the scope and limitations related to these services when developing opinions as to risks associated with the site.

The findings of the asbestos and lead-based paint assessment were based largely on visual observations within the amount of time available. The findings do not warrant that all asbestos containing materials and lead-based paint have been identified; asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint could be present in areas not readily-accessible to observation. In addition, the actual locations and quantities of materials determined to contain asbestos may vary from those herein. Apparent homogeneous sampling areas may vary in actual asbestos content due to previous renovations, maintenance or related operations. The possibility exists that suspect materials were undetected in inaccessible or concealed areas such as under carpeting or multiple flooring layers, and inside pipe chases or wall voids. If additional suspect materials are discovered during the planned destructive activities, bulk samples must be collected by an asbestos inspector and analyzed for asbestos content.

Appendices

Appendix I – Summary of Asbestos Results

Summary of Asbestos Results

JBC-NWS

Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287

Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017

HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.

Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample Number Sample Location

Type and

Percent

Asbestos

2403-DW-1 Attic-Wing B ND

2403-DW-2 Attic- Wing A ND

2403-DW-3 Attic- Wing C ND

2403-JC-01 Attic-Wing B ND

2403-JC-02 Attic-Wing B ND

2403-JC-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2403-JC-04 Attic- Wing D ND

2403-JC-05 Attic- Wing C ND

2403-JC-06 Attic- Wing A ND

2403-JC-07 Attic- Wing A ND

2403-DM1-01 Attic-Wing B ND

2403-DM1-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2403-DM1-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2403-DM2-01 Attic-Wing B ND

2403-DM2-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2403-DM2-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2403-EJ-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2403-EJ-02 Attic- Wing D ND

2403-EJ-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2403-FGM-01 Attic- Wing B ND

2403-FGM-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2403-FGM-03 Attic- Wing C ND

2403-FGM2-01 Attic-Wing D ND

2403-FGM2-02 Attic- Wing D ND

2403-FGM2-03 Attic- Wing A ND

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

Misc. NADW Drywall NA

Building 2403- Nimitz Hall

NA Surf. NAJC Joint Compound

Walls in the attic 5,500 F

Misc. NA

DM2

Mastic (grey) associated with ductwork

On ductwork in the attic 5,040 SF NA Misc. NA

DM1

Mastic (beige) associatd with ductwork

On ductwork in the attic

15,750 SF NA

Misc. NA

FGM2

Mastic (brown) associated with foamglass insulation

On piping in the attic 260 CF NA Misc. NA

FGM

Mastic (white) associated with foamglass insulation On piping in the attic 282 CF NA

EJ Expansion joint (black) On air handling units in the attic 8 SF NA Misc. NA

Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287

Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017

HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.

Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample Number Sample Location

Type and

Percent

Asbestos

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

2403-FS-01 Attic- Wing B ND

2403-FS-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2403-FS-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2404-DW-01 Attic-Wing D ND

2404-DW-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2404-DW-03 Attic- Wing A ND

2404-JC-01 Attic-Wing D ND

2404-JC-02 Attic-Wing D ND

2404-JC-03 Attic- Wing C ND

2404-JC-04 Attic- Wing B ND

2404-JC-05 Attic- Wing B ND

2404-JC-06 Attic- Wing A ND

2404-JC-07 Attic- Wing A ND

2404-DM1-01 Attic-Wing D ND

2404-DM1-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2404-DM1-03 Attic- Wing A ND

2404-DM2-01 Attic-Wing B ND

2404-DM2-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2404-DM2-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2404-EJ-01 Attic-Wing D ND

2404-EJ-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2404-EJ-03 Attic- Wing A ND

2404-FGM-01 Attic- Wing C ND

2404-FGM-02 Attic- Wing D ND

2404-FGM-03 Attic- Wing A ND

Mastic (beige) associatd with ductwork

On ductwork in the attic

15,750 SF NA

Misc. NA

DW Drywall

Walls 5,500 F

NA Misc. NA

JC Joint Compound NA Surf. NA

FS Fire stop mastic (red) Ceiling to the attic 12 SF NA

Building 2404- Seawolf Hall

EJ Expansion joint (black) On air handling units in the attic 8 SF NA Misc.

Misc. NA

DM2

Mastic (grey) associated with ductwork

On ductwork in the attic 5,040 Sf NA Misc. NA

DM1

NA

Misc. NAFGM Mastic (white) associated with foamglass insulation On piping in the attic 130 CF NA

Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287

Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017

HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.

Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample Number Sample Location

Type and

Percent

Asbestos

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

2404-FGM2-01 Attic- Wing C ND

2404-FGM2-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2404-FGM2-03 Attic- Wing C ND

2404-FGM3-01 Attic- Wing B ND

2404-FGM3-02 Attic- Wing B ND

2404-FGM3-03 Attic- Wing B ND

2405-DW-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2405-DW-02 Attic- Wing B ND

2405-DW-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2405-JC-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2405-JC-02 Attic-Wing A ND

2405-JC-03 Attic- Wing B ND

2405-JC-04 Attic- Wing C ND

2405-JC-05 Attic- Wing C ND

2405-JC-06 Attic- Wing D ND

2405-JC-07 Attic- Wing D ND

2405-DM1-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2405-DM1-02 Attic-Wing B ND

2405-DM1-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2405-DM2-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2405-DM2-02 Attic-Wing B ND

2405-DM2-03 Attic- Wing C ND

2405-EJ-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2405-EJ-02 Attic-Wing B ND

2405-EJ-03 Attic- Wing C ND

Building 2405- Trident Hall

DW Drywall

Walls 5,500 F

NA Misc. NA

JC Joint Compound NA Surf. NA

Misc. NAFGM3 Mastic (black) associated with foamglass insulation On piping in the attic 130 CF NA

FGM2

Mastic (brown) associated with foamglass insulation

On piping in the attic 282 CF NA Misc. NA

Misc. NA

DM2

Mastic (grey) associated with ductwork

On ductwork in the attic 5,040 SF NA Misc. NA

DM1

Mastic (beige) associatd with ductwork

On ductwork in the attic

15,750 SF NA

Misc. NAEJ Expansion joint (black) On air handling units in the attic

8 SF NA

Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287

Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017

HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.

Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample Number Sample Location

Type and

Percent

Asbestos

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

2405-FGM2-01 Attic- Wing A ND

2405-FGM2-02 Attic- Wing B ND

2405-FGM2-03 Attic- Wing C ND

2406-DW-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2406-DW-02 Attic- Wing B ND

2406-DW-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2406-JC-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2406-JC-02 Attic-Wing A ND

2406-JC-03 Attic- Wing B ND

2406-JC-04 Attic- Wing B ND

2406-JC-05 Attic- Wing C ND

2406-JC-06 Attic- Wing C ND

2406-JC-07 Attic- Wing D ND

2406-DM1-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2406-DM1-02 Attic-Wing C ND

2406-DM1-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2406-DM2-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2406-DM2-02 Attic-Wing C ND

2406-DM2-03 Attic- Wing D ND

FGM2

Mastic (brown) associated with foamglass insulation

On piping in the attic 130 CF NA Misc. NA

NA

JC Joint Compound NA Surf. NA

Building 2406- Skipjack Hall

DW Drywall

Walls 5,500 F

NA Misc.

Misc. NA

DM2

Mastic (grey) associated with ductwork

On ductwork in the attic 5,040 SF NA Misc. NA

DM1

Mastic (beige) associatd with ductwork

On ductwork in the attic

15,750 SF NA

Bldgs- 2403, 2404, 2405, 2406

Goose Creek, South Carolina

S&ME Project No. 4213-17-287

Date of Sampling: October 24 & 25, 2017

HA Area Material Description Material Location Approx.

Quantity Cat. (F/I/II) Type

Condition/

Potential for

Disturbance

Sample Number Sample Location

Type and

Percent

Asbestos

Table I: Summary of Asbestos Results

2406-EJ-01 Attic-Wing A ND

2406-EJ-02 Attic-Wing B ND

2406-EJ-03 Attic- Wing D ND

2406-FGM2-01 Attic- Wing A ND

2406-FGM2-02 Attic- Wing C ND

2406-FGM2-03 Attic- Wing D ND

ND = No Asbestos Detected LPD = low potential for disturbance G = good F= friable Misc = miscellaneous

NA = Not Applicable PD = potential for disturbance D = damaged NF = non-friable Surf = surfacing

SF = square feet PSD = potential for significant disturbance SD = significantly damaged EA = each TSI = thermal system insulation

CF = cubic feet HA = homogeneous area Cat. I = category I Cat. II = category II

EPA, SCDHEC and OSHA defines a material as asbestos containing if an asbestos content greater than one percent (>1%) is detected in a representative sample.

Quantities are estimated, and should not be used for bidding purposes, as field conditions should be verified.

Samples analyzed by TEM to confirm negative results reported by PLM analysis.

Misc. NA

FGM2

Mastic (brown) associated with foamglass insulation

On piping in the attic 542 CF NA TSI NA

EJ Expansion joint (black) On air handling units in the attic

8 SF NA

Appendix II– Diagram of Bulk Sample Locations

NOTES: BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED, NO ASBESTOS WAS

DETECTED.

NO PAINTED SURFACES MEETING THE SCDHEC

DISPOSAL LIMIT OF 0.7 mg/cm² WERE DETECTED.

WING D

WING B

WING C

WING A

LEGEND

BULK SAMPLE LOCATION

2403-JC-04

2403-DM1-03

2403-DM2-03

2403-EJ-03

2403-FGM2-01

2403-FGM2-02

2403-FS-03

2403-JC-03

2403-DW-02

2403-FS-02

2403-EJ-02

2403-DM2-02

2403-FGM-02

2403-FGM-03

2403-DM1-02

2403-DW-03

2403-JC-05

2403-DM2-01

2403-EJ-01

2403-FGM-01

2403-DM1-01

2403-JC-02

2403-DW-01

2403-JC-01

2403-JC-07

2403-JC-06

2403-FS-01

2403-FGM2-03

2403-XX-XX

FIGURE NO.

D r a w i n g p a t h

Q d r a w i n g s

J B

C d w g

PROJECT NUMBER

DATE:

SCALE:

0 50 100

(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE

L I M

I T

E D

A

S B

E S

T O

S

A

N

L

A

D B

A S

P

I N

T

A

S S

E S

S M

E N

T

B U

I L D

I N

G

N

I M

I T Z

H

L L

J O

I N

T

B

A S E

C

H A

R L E S T O

N

N

N P

T C

G O

O S E

C

R E E K

S O

U

C

R

O L I N

A

11-02-2017

1" = 50'

4213-17-287

2404-FGM3-01

2404-DW-02

2404-JC-03

2404-DW-01

2404-JC-01

2404-FGM-01

2404-DM2-01

2404-FGM-02

2404-FGM2-02

2424-FGM2-03

2404-DM1-02

2404-DM2-02

2404-EJ-02

2404-FGM2-01

2404-DM2-03

2404-JC-05

2404-JC-04

2404-EJ-03

2404-JC-06

2404-FGM-03

2404-DM1-03

2404-JC-07

2404-DW-03

2404-EJ-01

2404-JC-02

WING D

WING B

WING C

WING A

LEGEND

BULK SAMPLE LOCATION

2404-XX-XX

2404-FGM3-02

2404-FGM3-03

2404-DM1-01

NOTES: BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED, NO ASBESTOS WAS

DETECTED.

NO PAINTED SURFACES MEETING THE SCDHEC

DISPOSAL LIMIT OF 0.7 mg/cm² WERE DETECTED.

FIGURE NO.

D r a w i n g p a t h

Q d r a w i n g s

J B

C d w g

PROJECT NUMBER

DATE:

SCALE:

0 50 100

(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE

L I M

I T

B

E S

T O

S

A

A

D B

A S

I N

T

A

S S

E S

S M

E N

T

B U

I L D

I N

G

S E A

W O

L F

H

A L L

J O

I N

T

B

A S E

C

H A

R L E S T O

N

N

N P

T C

G O

O S E

C

R E E K

S O

U

R

O L I N

A

11-02-2017

1" = 50'

WING D

WING B

WING C

WING A

2405-EJ-02

2405-DM1-03

2405-JC-07

2405-FGM-01

2405-FGM-02

2405-FGM-03

2405-FGM2-03

2405-DM2-03

2405-EJ-03

2405-JC-04

2405-JC-05

2405-DW-03

2405-JC-06

2405-DM2-02

2405-JC-03

2405-DM1-02

2405-DW-02

2405-FGM2-02

2405-DW-01

2405-JC-01

2405-FGM2-01

2405-DM2-01

2405-EJ-01

2405-DM1-01

LEGEND

BULK SAMPLE LOCATION

2405-XX-XX

2405-JC-02

NOTES: BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED, NO ASBESTOS WAS

DETECTED.

NO PAINTED SURFACES MEETING THE SCDHEC

DISPOSAL LIMIT OF 0.7 mg/cm² WERE DETECTED.

FIGURE NO.

D r a w i n g p a t h

Q d r a w i n g s

J B

C d w g

PROJECT NUMBER

DATE:

SCALE:

0 50 100

(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE

L I M

I T

B

E S

T O

S

A

A

D B

A S

I N

T

A

S S

E S

S M

E N

T

B U

I L D

I N

G

T R

I D

E N

T

H

A L L

J O

I N

T

B

A S E

C

H A

R L E S T O

N

N

N P

T C

G O

O S E

C

R E E K

S O

U

R

O L I N

A

11-02-2017

1" = 50'

WING D

WING B

WING C

WING A

2406-JC-04

2406-DW-02

2406-FGM2-03

2406-DM2-03

2406-EJ-03

2406-DM1-03

2406-JC-07

2406-JC-05

2406-DM1-02

2406-DM2-02

2406-JC-06

2406-DW-03

2406-JC-03

2406-FGM2-02

2406-EJ-02

2406-EJ-01

2406-DM2-01

2406-FGM2-01

2406-DM1-01

2406-JC-02

2406-JC-01

2406-DW-01

LEGEND

BULK SAMPLE LOCATION

2406-XX-XX

NOTES: BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE BULK SAMPLES

COLLECTED AND ANALYZED, NO ASBESTOS WAS

DETECTED.

NO PAINTED SURFACES MEETING THE SCDHEC

DISPOSAL LIMIT OF 0.7 mg/cm² WERE DETECTED.

FIGURE NO.

D r a w i n g p a t h

Q d r a w i n g s

J B

C d w g

PROJECT NUMBER

DATE:

SCALE:

0 50 100

(IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)GRAPHIC SCALE

L I M

I T

B

E S

T O

S

A

A

D B

A S

I N

T

A

S S

E S

S M

E N

T

B U

I L D

I N

G

S K

I P

J A

K

L L

J O

I N

T

B

A S E

C

H A

R L E S T O

N

N

N P

T C

G O

O S E

C

R E E K

S O

U

R

O L I N

A

11-02-2017

1" = 50'

Appendix III- Copy of Inspector’s SCDHEC License

South Carolina

Department of Health and Environmental Control

Asbestos License

William Seaborn

Air Sampler AS-00416

Building Inspector BI-01317

S&ME, INC. / 620 Wando Park Blvd. / Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464 / p 843.884.0005 / f 843.881.6149 / www.smeinc.com http://www.smeinc.com/

Appendix IV- Laboratory Analysis Sheets and Chain of Custody

Records

Charleston Branch 620 Wando Park Blvd.

Mt. Pleasant SC 29464

Asbestos Analysis Summary

Client Job

Client Name

Date Analyzed

Date Received

10/31/2017

10/26/2017

ADC JBC Bldg 2403 Nimitz Hall

9771D Southern Pine Boulevard

Charlotte, NC 28273

704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929

NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

5 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

93 GYPSUM17-10056 2403-DW-01 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

5 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

93 GYPSUM17-10057 2403-DW-02 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

5 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

93 GYPSUM17-10058 2403-DW-03 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10059 2403-JC-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Analyzed by: Jane Wasilewski Jane Wasilewski Laboratory ManagerAdditional Comments:

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER17-10060 2403-JC-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10061 2403-JC-03 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10062 2403-JC-04 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10063 2403-JC-05 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10064 2403-JC-06 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10065 2403-JC-07 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER17-10066 2403-DM1-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10067 2403-DM1-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10069 2403-DM2-01 GREY PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10070 2403-DM2-02 GREY PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10072 2403-FGM-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10073 2403-FGM-02 WHITE PLIABLE ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER17-10075 2403-FGM2-01 TAN/GREY NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10076 2403-FGM2-02 TAN/GREY NONFIBROUS ND

2 CELLULOSE

<1 GLASS

98 OTHER

<1 PERLITE

17-10078 2403-FS-01 RED/GREY FIBROUS ND

3 CELLULOSE

1 GLASS

95 OTHER

1 PERLITE

17-10079 2403-FS-02 RED FIBROUS ND

75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10081 2403-EJ-01 BLACK FIBROUS ND

75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10082 2403-EJ-02 BLACK FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10083 2403-EJ-03 BLACK FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Asbestos Analysis Summary

Client Job

Client Name

Date Analyzed

Date Received

10/31/2017

10/26/2017

ADC JBC Bldg 2404 Sea Wolf Hall

9771D Southern Pine Boulevard

Charlotte, NC 28273

704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929

NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

5 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

93 GYPSUM17-10084 2404-DW-01 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

5 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

93 GYPSUM17-10085 2404-DW-02 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

2 GLASS 98 GYPSUM17-10086 2404-DW-03 BEIGE FIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10087 2404-JC-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER17-10088 2404-JC-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10089 2404-JC-03 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10090 2404-JC-04 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10091 2404-JC-05 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10092 2404-JC-06 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10093 2404-JC-07 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER17-10094 2404-DM1-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10095 2404-DM1-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10097 2404-DM2-01 GREY PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10098 2404-DM2-02 GREY PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10100 2404-FGM-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10101 2404-FGM-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER17-10103 2404-FGM2-01 YW/GREY NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10104 2404-FGM2-02 YW/GREY NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10106 2404-FGM3-01 BLACK NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10107 2404-FGM3-02 BLACK NONFIBROUS ND

75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10109 2404-EJ-01 BLACK FIBROUS ND

75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10110 2404-EJ-02 BLACK FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10111 2404-EJ-03 BLACK FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Asbestos Analysis Summary

Client Job

Client Name

Date Analyzed

Date Received

10/31/2017

10/26/2017

ADC JBC Bldg 2405 Trident Hall

9771D Southern Pine Boulevard

Charlotte, NC 28273

704-940-1830 Fax 704-565-4929

NVLAP Lab Code 102075-0

POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

Performed by EPA 600/R-93/116 Method

Non-Asbestos Fibrous Non-Fibrous

Lab ID: Sample #: Appearance %/Type

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

5 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

93 GYPSUM17-10112 2405-DW-01 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

2 GLASS

<1 CELLULOSE

98 GYPSUM17-10113 2405-DW-02 BEIGE FIBROUS ND

5 CELLULOSE

2 GLASS

93 GYPSUM17-10114 2405-DW-03 TAN/BEIGE FIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10115 2405-JC-01 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER17-10116 2405-JC-02 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10117 2405-JC-03 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10118 2405-JC-04 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10119 2405-JC-05 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10120 2405-JC-06 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10121 2405-JC-07 WHITE NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

100 OTHER17-10122 2405-DM1-01 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10123 2405-DM1-02 BEIGE PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10125 2405-DM2-01 GREY PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10126 2405-DM2-02 GREY PLIABLE ND

100 OTHER17-10128 2405-FGM2-01 YELLOW NONFIBROUS ND

100 OTHER17-10129 2405-FGM2-02 YW/GREY NONFIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is analyzed separately. ND = None Detected (Asbestos Not

Present In Representative Sample). RCF= (Refractory Ceramic Fiber) The results relate only to the items tested.

The sample may not be fully representative of the larger material in question. This sheet may not be reproduced except with permission from SME, Inc. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Although Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM/Dispersion Staining)

(Method EPA 600/R-93/116) is the specified method for analysis of bulk material samples for asbestos under the EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, there have been reports that this method may not identify asbestos when fiber sizes are extremely small or if they are bound in a resinous material. Such materials include floor tile, mastic and asphaltic roofing. Currently, reanalysis by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) to verify results of <1% or "None Detected" for these materials is recommended.

Job Number 4213-17-287

Asbestos Comments %/Type %/Type

75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10131 2405-EJ-01 BLACK FIBROUS ND

75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10132 2405-EJ-02 BLACK FIBROUS ND

75 GLASS 25 OTHER17-10133 2405-EJ-03 BLACK FIBROUS ND

For heterogeneous samples easily separated into subsamples, and for layered samples, each component is…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .