Attachment 3 - PPQ NMCSD UPS.docx
DOCX document 52 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HT941025Q2057
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the Naval Medical Center San Diego's Uninterruptible Power Supply and Data Center Refresh solicitation (HT941025Q2057). The solicitation is a 100% small business set-aside for procuring and installing new Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) and Performance Optimized Data Centers (PODs), which includes construction modifications to the existing Information Management Department server room. The PPQ template provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for rating contractor performance across seven key areas including quality, schedule, customer satisfaction, management, cost/financial management, safety/security, and general performance, using adjective ratings from Exceptional (E) to Unsatisfactory (U).
The solicitation is issued by the Defense Health Agency and seeks a contractor to perform a technical infrastructure refresh involving equipment procurement, installation, and configuration, with specific emphasis on electrical and facility modifications. The PPQ serves as a critical tool for potential contractors to demonstrate past performance by having previous clients complete detailed performance assessments that will be used in evaluating the contractor's qualifications for this specific project. Contractors are expected to submit completed questionnaires from relevant previous projects that align with the solicitation's technical requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AMENDMENT 0003 HT94102Q2057.pdf | ||
| AMENDMENT 0002 HT94102Q2057.pdf | ||
| AMENDMENT 0001 HT94102Q2057.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Quote Sheet NMCSD UPS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 - Experience Project Data Sheet NMCSD UPS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - SOW NMCSD UPS.pdf | ||
| HT941025Q2057 CSS NMCSD UPS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT “3”
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
SOLICTATION NUMBER HT941025Q2057
Page 1 of this form is to be completed by the Quoter. All remaining pages of this form are to be completed by the Client. Submit (1 per project) in order to provide supporting project information for Factor 3, Past Performance. Only projects that are within the project description parameters of the solicitation will be considered relevant.
CONTRACT INFORMATION
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Company Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | UEI: |
Phone Number:
Point of Contact (POC):
POC Email Address:
POC Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Subcontractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work: |_| High |_| Medium |_| Routine How is this project relevant to the project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
NOTE: IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS IT DIRECTLY BACK TO THE CONTRACTOR. THE CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE GOVERNMENT WITH THEIR QUOTE, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON GOVERNMENT SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE CONTRACTOR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNMENT. PLEASE CONTACT THE CONTRACTOR FOR GOVERNMENT POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
Revised April 2011
Attachment “3” – PPQ, Page 1 of 4
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (NA) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
Contractor Name:
Client Name:
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY
| a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts |
| E VG S M U NA |
| b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| E VG S M U NA |
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| E VG S M U NA |
| d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) |
| E VG S M U NA |
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
| a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If the schedule was not met, please address below) |
| E VG S M U NA |
| b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract |
| E VG S M U NA |
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? |
| E VG S M U NA |
| b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) |
| E VG S M U NA |
| c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? |
| E VG S M U NA |
| d) Overall customer satisfaction |
| E VG S M U NA |
4. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR
| a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force |
| E VG S M U NA |
| b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce for this effort |
| E VG S M U NA |
| c) Government Property Control |
| E VG S M U NA |
| d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| E VG S M U NA |
| e) Utilization of Small Business concerns |
| E VG S M U NA |
| f) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes |
| E VG S M U NA |
| g) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project) |
| E VG S M U NA |
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s) |
| E VG S M U NA |
| b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client. |
| E VG S M U NA |
| c) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. |
| Yes No NA |
Contractor Name:
Client Name:
| d) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns). |
| E VG S M U NA |
| e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below. |
| Yes No NA |
| f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. |
| Yes No NA |
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
| a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the user’s rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.) |
| E VG S M U NA |
| b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. |
| E VG S M U NA |
7. GENERAL
| a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). |
| E VG S M U NA |
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| E VG S M U NA |
| c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) |
| Yes No |
| In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| E VG S M U |
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or any additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist the Government in evaluating performance risk. (Please attach additional pages if necessary):
Date this Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
Client’s Signature:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .