Attachment 3 - Past Performance Survey.pdf
PDF 138 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-23-R-00120
About this file
This solicitation package is for HVAC and electrical upgrades at the NAS Enterprise Management Center located at the Salt Lake City Air Route Traffic Control Center in Utah. The estimated construction value is between $250,000 and $500,000. A site visit is scheduled for February 22, 2023 and requests for information or clarification must be submitted by March 1. Offers are due by March 8 with submissions under 10MB in size. The Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration is the agency seeking these upgrades on a competitive basis. Past performance surveys are requested for contractors and their key personnel as part of the solicitation and selection process.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS
SOLICITATION NO. 697DCK-23-R-00120
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ACQUISITION ACTIVITY
Salt Lake City, UT
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a contractor for a project at the NAS
Enterprise Management Center (NEMC) at FAA’s Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) located in
Salt Lake City, UT. As part of the solicitation process, we are collecting past performance information on contractors and their key personnel. This information will be used to assist the FAA in the selection of a contractor to complete the project. You have been listed as a past performance reference.
Please rate each of the criteria according to the following scale:
1 0 – 25% of the time Strongly Disagree PLEASE RETURN COMPLETED RESPONSE
TO:
Federal Aviation Administration
ATTN: Elaina Atkins
E-MAIL: elaina.d.atkins@faa.gov
2 26 – 40% of the time Disagree
3 41 – 55% of the time Somewhat Disagree
4 56 – 70% of the time Somewhat Agree
5 71 – 85% of the time Agree
6 86 – 100% of the time Strongly Agree
NA No Knowledge of This Element
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
RATER’S NAME & TITLE
RATER’S ORGANIZATION / AGENCY
RATER’S TEL NO.
RATER’S E-MAIL ADDRESS:
CONTRACTOR’S NAME & ADDRESS
PROJECT TITLE OR DESCRIPTION OF
REQUIREMENT:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
CONTRACT VALUE (INCLUDING OPTIONS):
CONTRACT TYPE:
FIXED PRICE COST + FEE
COMPETITIVE NON-COMPETITIVE
SET-ASIDE
SEALED BID NEGOTIATED
SEALED BID NEGOTIATED
CONTRACT AWARD & COMPLETION DATE:
PAST PERFORMANCE ELEMENT
RATING
1 2 3 4 5 6 NA
1. Contractor was able to manage project cost.
2. Contractor was able to maintain project schedule
(completed on time or early).
3. Contractor adhered to all contract requirements
4. Contractor was efficient in project coordination.
5. Contractor utilized problem solving skills effectively when problems arose during the project.
6. Contractor was able to follow specifications, regulations, and requirements (building codes, customer specific policy, etc.)
7. Contractor made necessary changes or corrective work as necessary in a timely manner?
8. Overall customer satisfaction
Comments or additional information:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .