Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) - AF COOL.docx
DOCX document 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AF COOL Purchase Agent (AMENDMENT 0001) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA330021R0004
About this file
This document provides details for a federal solicitation seeking a contractor to purchase approved civilian credentialing exams, materials, and courses for enlisted Air Force personnel through the Air Force Credentialing Opportunities On-Line program. The Air Force, through the Air Education and Training Command and 42nd Contracting Squadron, will issue the solicitation on February 2, 2021 seeking these purchase agent services. The requirement will be set aside 100% for small businesses with a NAICS code of 611710 and size standard of $16.5 million. The contract will be a best value, firm-fixed-price or cost-reimbursement contract evaluated under FAR Part 15.3 using the Performance Price Tradeoff procedure. Offerors must submit proposals in four volumes by the closing date: a summary, technical proposal, past performance, and price proposal.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 - Performance-based Work Statement (PWS) Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Section L Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA330021R00040001 SF 30 (3).pdf | ||
| AF COOL Questions_Answers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Section L.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Performance-based Work Statement (PWS) - 21 Jan 2021.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 - Section M.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Subcontractor_Consent_Letter.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA330021R0004.pdf | ||
| Wage Determination 2015-4607 REV 10 18 JUN 20.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Past_Performance_Information (AF COOL).docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA330021R0004
Attachment 5
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Offerors shall forward this attachment for completion to each contract reference the offeror wants the government to consider. Offerors shall ensure each respondent submits a completed questionnaire directly to Monica Philpot, Contract Administrator (CA), monica.philpot@us.af.mil and Mark Restad, Contracting Officer (CO), mark.restad.1@us.af.mil by the closing date of the RFP. Offerors are encouraged to have respondents submit the information prior to the closing date x:00PM CT, xx Feb 2021.
| Contractor’s Name: | Project Title: | Contract Number Assigned to the Contractor: |
| Contract Award Amount: $ | Contract Final Amount: $ |
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. AGENCY INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: Title:
Address: Telephone Number:
Email Address:
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
Respondent shall include information below regarding the work performed. Use the Confident Rating table to complete this section.
Were you the prime contractor? Subcontractor? Joint Venture?
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, VG, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E
VG
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral/Not Applicable
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
| Technical Expertise and Project Supervision |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| 1 |
| Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| Contractor hired and retained field workers with appropriate technical skills and training commensurate with those required for successful project completion. |
| 3 |
| Contractor delegated authority to contract managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. Contract manager’s role was clear. |
| 4 |
| Provided on-site contract manager/supervisor at all times, or as otherwise required by the specific contract. |
Home Office/On-Site/Government Interaction
| 5 |
| Identified risks/problems as they occurred and offered constructive and/or viable solution/alternatives. |
| 6 |
| Contractor was responsive and reasonable to contract changes from the standpoint of timeliness, suggested solutions, and price. |
| 7 |
| Contractor displayed a cooperative attitude with company/government personnel before and after award. |
| 8 |
| Contractor’s on-site contract manager/supervisor displayed initiative to resolve problems on-site. |
Service Quality
| 9 |
| Contractor provided and followed effective quality control plan and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 10 |
| Contractor’s emphasis on delivering a quality service was apparent in day-to-day operations. |
| 11 |
| Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 12 |
| Contractor maintained a quality workforce and subcontractors through project completion. |
Schedule
| 13 |
| Developed realistic progress schedules and met established project milestones. |
| 14 |
| Contractor provided the required Reports/Documentation as required in the contract. |
Other
Were there any claims by subcontractors/suppliers for non- payment. If yes, please explain outcome in “Remarks”
| YES |
| NO |
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in "Remarks."
| YES |
| NO |
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in "Remarks."
| YES |
| NO |
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
| Overall, on the scale of 1 – 6, how would you rate the contractor being surveyed |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
Remarks____________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .