Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DFAS-CO Ergonomic Consulting Services
- Solicitation number
- 3002564
- Issued by
-
Defense Finance and Accounting Service
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for DFAS's Ergonomic Consulting Services solicitation (RFQ HQ042325QE011). The questionnaire must be submitted by 4:00 PM EST on February 13, 2025 to terri.l.davis34.civ@mail.mil and christina.l.rosen.civ@mail.mil.
The PPQ consists of three sections: Section A for quoter information (company details, contract information, and work description), Section B for respondent information, and Section C for performance ratings across technical performance, quality of work, schedule performance, and cost performance. The rating scale ranges from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with specific evaluation criteria for each rating level. The questionnaire also includes yes/no questions about risk management and willingness to work with the contractor again, with space for additional remarks and explanations for any marginal or unsatisfactory ratings.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information FAR 2.101 & 3.104
Past Performance Questionnaire Defense Finance and Accounting Service Ergonomic Consulting Services
RFQ HQ042325QE011
INSTRUCTIONS:
QUOTER: Please complete Section A and send the Past Performance Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer, COR or Other Customer POC with knowledge of performance.
RESPONDENT: Thank you in advance for completing this questionnaire for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). We understand that your time is very valuable, and we appreciate your input. Your rating is essential in successfully evaluating past performance. In reference to the information provided in Section A, please complete Sections B and C of this questionnaire and submit directly to DFAS by 4:00 PM EST on 13 February 2025. Email completed questionnaires to terri.l.davis34.civ@mail.mil and christina.l.rosen.civ@mail.mil.
SECTION A: QUOTER INFORMATION
| Company Name: |
| CAGE: |
| Point of Contact: |
| Title: |
| Email Address: |
| Phone Number: |
| Contract Number: |
| Dollar Amount: |
Contract Period of Performance:
Performed as the prime contractor or sub-contractor:
Brief Description of Work Performed:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Company Name:
| Point of Contact: |
| Title: |
| Email Address: |
| Phone Number: |
SECTION C: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Use the below performance ratings and definitions to reflect your evaluation.
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional (E) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable (NA) |
| No information or did not apply. |
Using the chart above, please place an X in the column with the performance rating that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. Please respond with a narrative explanation for any ratings of unsatisfactory or marginal.
| Performance Objective |
| Rating |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Overall Technical Performance
Quality of Work
Schedule Performance
Cost Performance
For the questions below, please place an X in the column that represents your response. Please respond with a narrative explanation for any no responses.
| Question |
| Yes |
| No |
Did the contractor proactively identify risk areas, mitigate risks, and respond to emergency and critical situations?
Would you use this contractor again?
Narrative Explanation / Additional Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .