ATTACHMENT 3 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Mission Command Training Program (MCTP) Second Draft RFP Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91QF423RMCTP
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and cover letter sample for a federal contract opportunity. The Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis is seeking a contractor to provide training support services for the Mission Command Training Program. Respondents are asked to provide performance ratings and rationales for previous clients in areas like compliance, project management, timeliness, cost controls, and customer satisfaction. Completed questionnaires must be returned to the contracting officer by a specified due date to be considered during source selection. The opportunity notice indicates the training contract will use NAICS code 611699 and PSC U013, while a separate software licensing procurement will use NAICS 513210 and PSC DA10. Industry is requested to submit any feedback on the revised two-contract approach by February 6, 2024 to inform finalization of the solicitation and RFQ.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CDRL A-19.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-18.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-17.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-2.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 1 SUBCONTRACTOR OR TEAMING PARTNER CONSENT LETTER.docx | DOCX document | |
| CDRL A-5.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-4.pdf | ||
| MCTP PWS DRAFT with Tracked Changes 23JAN2024.docx | DOCX document | |
| CDRL A-12.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-15.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-14.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-11.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-10.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-9.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-8.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-3.pdf | ||
| TRADOC Regulation 350-50-3 REVISED 12 JUL 23.pdf | ||
| REVISED MCTP_Handbook_v1.1_20221020.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 5 Sample Exercises Cost Estimate Sheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT 2 SPECIFIC RELEVANT CONTRACTS SHEET.docx | DOCX document | |
| W91QF423RMCTP DRAFT.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-16.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-13.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-7.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-6.pdf | ||
| CDRL A-1.pdf |
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3:
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Table 4. Performance Confidence Assessments
| Adjectival Rating |
| Description |
| Substantial Confidence |
| Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Unknown Confidence |
| No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. |
(Neutral)
| Limited Confidence |
| Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| No Confidence |
| Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs
· Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER
LETTERHEAD
(Date)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC)-Fort Eustis is in the process of selecting a Contractor for the Mission Command Training Program (MCTP).
One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts.
Our areas of interest in the Offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. As discussed in our initial phone contact with your office, our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response no later than (NLT) _______ calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.
To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be emailed to Ms. Jennifer Hayden (Contract Specialist) at jennifer.s.hayden.civ@army.mil. Please ensure the subject of the email is “MCTP Past Performance Questionnaire – In Support of Contractor Name.” Please direct questions to the same email address. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.
Your help is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .