Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Spectrum Beacon Tower Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA930121R0003
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is seeking input on a contractor's performance on a prior project involving construction at Edwards Air Force Base in California. It requests ratings and narratives on 19 performance criteria.
The federal contract opportunity is to replace an outdated 108-foot beacon tower at Edwards Air Force Base. The new self-supporting tower must not exceed 180 feet and will support radio frequency spectrum management operations. The solicitation will use the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable source selection process and is set aside for small businesses. The project scope includes deconstruction of the previous tower. The magnitude is estimated between $500,000 to $1,000,000, with a 180-day performance period after notice to proceed. The contractor must be registered in SAM.gov to be eligible for award.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFIs Received 17June-Answer to Generator Questions (1).docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Amendment FA930121R00030003 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Beacon Tower SOW and Attachments Updated 24 June 2021.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA930121R00030002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| SCE Approved Drawing.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA930121R00030001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Beacon Tower SOW and Attachments Updated_7 June 2021.pdf | ||
| Beacon Tower Pictures.docx | DOCX document | |
| Answered RFIs.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - EAL Template.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2- Wage Determination CA20210022.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Beacon Tower SOW and Attachments_09 APR 2021.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA930121R0003.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a construction contract at Edwards AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Jonny Ochoa at (661) 277-0968 or jonny.ochoa@us.af.mil.
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
KIM M DAVIS
Contracting Officer
1 Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: Address: Phone Number:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror:
Dollar Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: Title:
Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number: Email Address:
Respondent wet or digital signature: _________________________
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: AFTC/PCIOZ Contracting Attn: Jonny Ochoa jonny.ochoa@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| Substantial Confidence |
| Satisfactory Confidence |
| Limited Confidence |
| No Confidence |
| Unknown Confidence |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort |
| No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 5. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 6. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 7. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 8. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 9. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 10. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 11. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 12. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 13. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 14. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 15. |
| Completed projects involving mechanical, electrical and plumbing renovations. |
| 16. |
| Is familiar with Unified Facilities Criteria’s (UFCs) for HVAC, Plumbing and Interior Electrical Systems. |
| 17. |
| Modified fire alarm systems and wet pipe fire sprinkler systems. |
| The contractor: |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
18. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.
EXPLANATION:
· Yes
· No
| 19. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain. EXPLANATION: |
| · Yes |
· No
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .