Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
Spectrum Beacon Tower Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA930121R0003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is seeking input on a contractor's performance on a prior project involving construction at Edwards Air Force Base in California. It requests ratings and narratives on 19 performance criteria.

The federal contract opportunity is to replace an outdated 108-foot beacon tower at Edwards Air Force Base. The new self-supporting tower must not exceed 180 feet and will support radio frequency spectrum management operations. The solicitation will use the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable source selection process and is set aside for small businesses. The project scope includes deconstruction of the previous tower. The magnitude is estimated between $500,000 to $1,000,000, with a 180-day performance period after notice to proceed. The contractor must be registered in SAM.gov to be eligible for award.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a construction contract at Edwards AFB, CA.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Jonny Ochoa at (661) 277-0968 or jonny.ochoa@us.af.mil.

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

KIM M DAVIS

Contracting Officer

1 Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: Address: Phone Number:

Project Title and Brief Description of Work:

Contract Number Provided by Offeror:

Dollar Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address:

Telephone Number: Fax Number: Email Address:

Respondent wet or digital signature: _________________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: AFTC/PCIOZ Contracting Attn: Jonny Ochoa jonny.ochoa@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.

1
2
3
4
5
Substantial Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence
No Confidence
Unknown Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort
No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
1
2
3
4
5
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
5.
Identified problems as they occurred.
6.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
7.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
8.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
9.
Met established project schedules.
10.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
11.
Provided adequate project supervision.
12.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
13.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
14.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
15.
Completed projects involving mechanical, electrical and plumbing renovations.
16.
Is familiar with Unified Facilities Criteria’s (UFCs) for HVAC, Plumbing and Interior Electrical Systems.
17.
Modified fire alarm systems and wet pipe fire sprinkler systems.
The contractor:
1
2
3
4
5

18. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

· Yes

· No

19. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain. EXPLANATION:
· Yes

· No

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .