Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Advanced Driving Class Expendable Vehicles (ADCETV) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA441721Q0014
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Conformed Copy - FA441721Q0014 - 2 June 2021.pdf | ||
| Amendment 2 - Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement - 26 May 2021.pdf | ||
| Amendment 2 - Attachment 4 - Instructions - updated 1 June.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002 - FA441721Q00140002 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 - Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement - 29 Apr 2021.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers Set 1.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 - Attachment 2 - WD 2015-4531 (Rev15).pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 - Attachment 4 - Instructions.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA441721Q00140001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 - Attachment 5 - Evaluation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Wage Determination .pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA441721Q0014.pdf | ||
| Attachement 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Instructions.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Evaluation.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104 Past/Present Performance Questionnaire
FA441721Q0014
ATTACHMENT 3
SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
1. Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Point of Contact:
3. Phone Number:
4. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
5. Period of Performance:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)
1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:
2. Respondent’s Name:
3. Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail:
4. Award Amount:
Final Amount:
5. Project Title:
Project Number:
6. Brief Project Description:
7. Period of Performance:
Start Date:
End Date:
SECTION C: EMAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO:
| Contract Specialist: |
| Nick Rogers |
| Email: |
| Robert.rogers.70@us.af.mil |
| Contracting Officer: |
| Mike Carnley |
| Email: |
| Charles.Carnley@us.af.mil |
THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: The closing date and time of solicitation.
SECTION D: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY UNSATISFACTORY OR MARGINAL RATINGS.
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
Exceptional (Outstanding) Very Good (Above Average)
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Available |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented |
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
1. QUALITY: Performance adhered to contract requirements. Provided effective quality control.
☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
2. MANAGEMENT: Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements. Adequately coordinate and controlled performance of subcontractors. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
3. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE: Contractor complied with Financial, Environmental, Safety, and Reporting Requirements. Contractor was compliant with labor standards, posting of EEO, labor rates, minimum wage.
Payrolls were completed properly and received in a timely matter. No safety discrepancies were noted.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
4. RELIABILITY: Contractor provided vehicles by the date and time established in the contract. Vehicles were received without significant defects or mechanical issues and were consistently reliable during use.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:
5. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? ☐YES ☐NO
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:
Signature of Respondent: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________ FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .