Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionaire.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA561326Q0006
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for solicitation FA561326Q0006 regarding 435th Air Ground Operations Wing (AGOW) Human Performance Optimization (HPO) Services to be performed across various German locations. The questionnaire must be completed and returned to TSgt Carleen Clinger at carleen.clinger@us.af.mil prior to the offer due date of 07 August 2026.
The PPQ requests contractors to provide general information including company name, address, contact details, and a brief description of HPO services provided, along with contract details such as contract number, amount, period of performance, and place of performance. Respondents must indicate whether they performed as prime contractor or sub-contractor and identify key personnel. The evaluation criteria require contractors to rate their past performance across nine dimensions using a six-point scale (Exceptional, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Neutral), including service turnaround times, compliance with performance work statements, personnel qualifications and retention, problem resolution and communication, overall performance, cure notice history, CPARS ratings for U.S. Government contracts, and willingness to award future contracts. Contractors must also provide narrative explanations for ratings and identify strengths, weaknesses, and other relevant remarks. This questionnaire is a template document used to evaluate contractor past performance on related HPO service contracts.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0001 Questions_Answers.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionaire Amendment 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Pricing Worksheet Amendment 0001.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation - FA561326Q0006 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - DD 254.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Pricing Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA561326Q0006.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This PPQ is for the solicitation (No. FA561326Q0006) of 435th AGOW Human Performance Optimization (HPO) services across various German locations.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name
Contractor’s Address
Contractor’s Telephone # (add country code)
Contractor’s Email Address
Contractor’s Point of Contact (POC)
Brief Description of Work (services conducted)
Type Personnel Serviced (Military, Special Warfare Military, Civilian)
Contract Number
Contract Amount
Contract Period or Dates of Performance
Contract Place of Performance
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the Contracting Office.
Respondent’s Name
Respondent’s Title
Respondent’s Address
Respondent’s Telephone # (add country code)
Respondent’s Email Address
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM PRIOR TO OFFER DUE DATE OF 07 AUGUST 2026
TSgt Carleen Clinger at carleen.clinger@us.af.mil Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix below and please provide a narrative explanation for any rating given.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Has the offeror met required service turnaround times? |
| 2. |
| Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to comply with the applicable performance work statement/statement of work to render services in a timely fashion? |
| 3. |
| Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to provide qualified personnel (to include certifications) |
| 4. |
| Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to retain qualified personnel? |
| 5. |
| Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to communicate and resolve problems timely and thoroughly? |
| 6. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 7. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? |
If yes, explain outcome in “other remarks.”
YES / NO
| 8. |
| For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES / NO |
| 9. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES / NO |
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Other Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .