Attachment 3- OPPD.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Logistics and Warehouse Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00244-25-R-0010
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Data form for a Navy logistics and warehouse support solicitation (N00244-25-R-0010). The solicitation is an 8(a) competitive small business set-aside for a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) commercial contract to provide logistics support services for Explosive Ordnance Disposal units at Naval Amphibious Base Coronado, California. Required services include financial analysis, integrated logistics overhaul, warehouse support, supply technician services, inventory administration, material transportation coordination, data analysis, quality assurance, material stowage, and technical training.
The form is designed for collecting detailed past performance information from previous contractors, allowing the Navy to evaluate a potential contractor's performance history. It includes comprehensive rating sections for quality, timeliness, responsiveness, and overall contractor performance, with specific questions about customer satisfaction, problem resolution, cost control, and likelihood of future contract awards. Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) prior to contract award, and the procurement falls under NAICS code 541614 for Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions and Answers 3.19.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- EOD Warehouse Price Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| PWS REV1 Final .pdf | ||
| N00244-25-R-0010-0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7-Questions and Answers Updated.pdf | ||
| N00244-25-R-0010- 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7-Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- EOD Warehouse Price Template REV2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6- WD 2015-5635 REV26.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1- PWS Final.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5- DD Form 254 .pdf | ||
| N00244-25-R-0010 Final.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- EOD Warehouse Price Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4- QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A-CDRL001 .pdf | ||
| Exhibit B- CDRL002 .pdf | ||
| Exhibit C- CDRL003 .pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE DATA
Solicitation N00024-25-R-0010
Complete and return no later than the solicitation closing date to:
NAVSUP FLC San Diego Attn: Patricia Castillo Phone: (619) 556-5523 Email: patricia.castillo26.civ@us.navy.mil
On behalf of:
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Description of Effort: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ | |
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the NAVSUP FLC San Diego to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
2. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
3. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
4. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .