Attachment 3 - Evaluation Factors For Award - Mobile Surveillance Trailer.pdf
PDF 133 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 21 SFS Mobile Surveillance System
- Solicitation number
- FA251725Q0082
About this file
The document is an Evaluation Factors for Award file for a Mobile Surveillance System solicitation by the 21st Contracting Squadron at Peterson Space Force Base. The procurement is a 100% small business set-aside for two Mobile Surveillance Systems, with a firm-fixed price contract under NAICS code 561621. The evaluation will use a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) methodology, with two primary factors: Total Price and Technical Acceptability. Technical acceptability requires vendors to demonstrate compliance with Salient Characteristics and provide a guaranteed delivery lead time, with both subfactors requiring an "Acceptable" rating to be considered for award.
Vendors must submit quotes via email to SrA Kyle Howard by Friday, 18 July 2025 at 2:00 PM MDT, after submitting any questions by Friday, 11 July 2025 at 12:00 PM MDT. Active SAM registration is mandatory for contract eligibility. The government will evaluate pricing by ranking offers from lowest to highest and assessing technical proposals for technical acceptability, with award going to the lowest-priced technically acceptable offer. Proposals may be rejected if they do not clearly demonstrate understanding of the solicitation requirements or take exception to the stated terms.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Factors For Award
(1) Basis for Award: The Government intends to award a firm-fixed price contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA).
(2) Evaluation Factors: The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:
• Factor 1: Total Price
• Factor 2: Technical Acceptability
• Subfactor 1.1: Salient Characteristics: (Acceptable/Unacceptable)
a. Describe how you will provide equipment that meets the requirements described in the Salient Characteristics. Offers shall clearly state how the proposed Mobile Surveillance System solution meets each salient characteristic outlined.
• Subfactor 1.2: Delivery Lead Time: (Acceptable/Unacceptable)
a. Lead-time: Proposals must include a guaranteed lead time.
(3) Technical Acceptability: To be eligible for award, an offeror must receive an "Acceptable" rating for both Subfactors 1.1 and 1.2 under the Technical Acceptability Factor. If an offeror receives an "Unacceptable" rating for either subfactor, the entire proposal will be considered Technically Unacceptable and will not be eligible for award.
(4) Evaluation Standards: The Government will evaluate the Offeror's Total Price and Technical Proposal based on the information provided to determine the Offeror's understanding of the requirements and ability to perform the work.
• Acceptable: The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation and demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the requirements in the Salient Characteristics.
• Unacceptable: The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
(5) Evaluation Process:
a. The Government will first conduct a review of the overall quoted pricing and place the Offerors in order from lowest to highest price. Prices will be evaluated for reasonableness.
Generally, adequate price competition will satisfy the criteria of price reasonableness; other methods include, but are not limited to, historical prices paid and comparison to the Independent Government Estimate.
b. Beginning with the lowest quoted price, Offeror's technical proposals will be evaluated as "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" in accordance with the description at "(3) Technical Acceptability" to determine whether it is Technically Acceptable. Technical evaluation will end when either all quotes have been evaluated for technical acceptability or there are two technically acceptable quotes. Only those Offerors whose Technical Proposals are determined to be Technically Acceptable will be considered for award.
c. Award will be made to the Offeror whose offer is determined to be the lowest price and technically acceptable.
d. An offer may be rejected if the offeror takes exception to the solicitation requirements, or if the offeror's proposal indicates that the offeror does not clearly understand the requirements.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .