Attachment 3 - Evaluation Factors For Award - Flyaway SATCOM Terminal.pdf
PDF 133 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Flyaway SATCOM Terminal Antenna
- Solicitation number
- FA251725Q0089
About this file
The document is an Evaluation Factors for Award file for a Flyaway SATCOM Terminal Antenna solicitation (Solicitation Number FA251725Q0089) issued by the Department of the Air Force Space Command. The procurement is a 100% small business set-aside for one terminal antenna at Peterson Space Force Base, Colorado, with a firm-fixed price contract under NAICS code 334220. The government will award the contract to the lowest-priced technically acceptable (LPTA) offeror who meets two critical evaluation factors: Total Price and Technical Acceptability, which includes subfactors for Salient Characteristics and Delivery Lead Time.
Offerors must be actively registered in the System for Award Management (SAM), provide a guaranteed lead time, and clearly demonstrate how their proposed terminal meets all specified characteristics. The solicitation requires submission of quotes via email to SrA Kyle Howard by Friday, August 13, 2025, at 2:00 PM MDT, with questions due by Friday, August 1, 2025, at 12:00 PM MDT. Technical proposals will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, with rejection possible if the offeror does not clearly understand or takes exception to the solicitation requirements.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Factors For Award
(1) Basis for Award: The Government intends to award a firm-fixed price contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA).
(2) Evaluation Factors: The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:
• Factor 1: Total Price
• Factor 2: Technical Acceptability
• Subfactor 1.1: Salient Characteristics: (Acceptable/Unacceptable)
a. Describe how you will provide equipment that meets the requirements described in the Salient Characteristics. Offers shall clearly state how the proposed Flyaway SATCOM Terminal Antena meets each salient characteristic outlined.
• Subfactor 1.2: Delivery Lead Time: (Acceptable/Unacceptable)
a. Lead-time: Proposals must include a guaranteed lead time.
(3) Technical Acceptability: To be eligible for award, an offeror must receive an "Acceptable" rating for both Subfactors 1.1 and 1.2 under the Technical Acceptability Factor. If an offeror receives an "Unacceptable" rating for either subfactor, the entire proposal will be considered Technically Unacceptable and will not be eligible for award.
(4) Evaluation Standards: The Government will evaluate the Offeror's Total Price and Technical Proposal based on the information provided to determine the Offeror's understanding of the requirements and ability to perform the work.
• Acceptable: The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation and demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the requirements in the Salient Characteristics.
• Unacceptable: The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
(5) Evaluation Process:
a. The Government will first conduct a review of the overall quoted pricing and place the Offerors in order from lowest to highest price. Prices will be evaluated for reasonableness.
Generally, adequate price competition will satisfy the criteria of price reasonableness; other methods include, but are not limited to, historical prices paid and comparison to the Independent Government Estimate.
b. Beginning with the lowest quoted price, Offeror's technical proposals will be evaluated as "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" in accordance with the description at "(3) Technical Acceptability" to determine whether it is Technically Acceptable. Technical evaluation will end when either all quotes have been evaluated for technical acceptability or there are two technically acceptable quotes. Only those Offerors whose Technical Proposals are determined to be Technically Acceptable will be considered for award.
c. Award will be made to the Offeror whose offer is determined to be the lowest price and technically acceptable.
d. An offer may be rejected if the offeror takes exception to the solicitation requirements, or if the offeror's proposal indicates that the offeror does not clearly understand the requirements.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .