Attachment 25. Performance Assesmnet Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 229 KB Posted

Attached to
FY24 Fort Bliss DPW Grounds Maintenance
Solicitation number
W911RZ-24-R-0004
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and notice of contract action. The Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Carson intends to issue a request for proposal for ground maintenance services at Fort Bliss, Texas on or about February 12, 2024, with written proposals due on or about March 12, 2024. This acquisition is a follow-on effort to contract W911S8-19-D-0001 and is to perform ground maintenance services at Fort Bliss, including mowing and trimming, turf replacement, leaf and debris removal, tree, hedge, and shrub planting, maintenance, irrigation and fertilization, and policing of areas. The government intends to award a single fixed price indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract as a result of this solicitation for a one year base period and four one year option periods, with an estimated start date of May 1, 2024. This action is being released as a competitive 8(a) set-aside with a NAICS code of 561730.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 21. PWS TE 06 Performance Requirements Summary (PRS).pdf PDF
Attachment 8. PWS TE 01c East (IBCTs) Bliss Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 5. TE 01 Landscape Handbook for Historic Properties - 2009.pdf PDF
Attachment 24. PWS TE 09 Fort Bliss Installation Energy and Water Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 20. PWS TE 05 Fort Bliss Mission Essential Functions (MEF).pdf PDF
Attachment 11. PWS TE 01f Range Map 1 Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 23. PWS TE 08 Artificial Turf Fields.pdf PDF
Attachment 16. PWS TE 01k New Hospital.pdf PDF
Attachment 1. Pricing Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7. PWS TE 01b East (BCTs) Bliss Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 29. SCA WD 2015-5455, Rev. 23, dated 26 Dec 2023.pdf PDF
Attachment 14. TE 01i Tobin Wells Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 10. PWS TE 01e Main Cantonment Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 13. TE 01h Southeast Bliss Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 3. PWS-Acceptable Quality Levels.pdf PDF
Attachment 28. Service Contract Act WD 2015-5447 NM, Dona Ana.pdf PDF
Attachment 9. PWS TE 01d Logan Heights & Rail Deployment Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 17. PWS TE 02 Installation Environmental Compliance.pdf PDF
Attachment 6. PWS TE 01a Fort Bliss Ground Maintenance Central Bliss Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 15. PWS TE 01j West Bliss Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 2. Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf PDF
Attachment 26. RECENT AND RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE CONTRACT REFERENCE.pdf PDF
Attachment 4. PWS-Work Capability Levels.pdf PDF
Attachment 18. PWS TE 03 Fort Bliss Hazardous Waste Management Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 27. Service Contract Act WD 2015-5225.pdf PDF
Attachment 19. PWS TE 04 Fort Bliss Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 12. TE 01g Map 2 Combined.pdf PDF
Attachment 22. PWS TE 07 Contractor Badge Request Form.pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire - Cover Letter

918TH CONTRACTING BATTALION MISSION AND INSTALLATION

CONTRACTING COMMAND - FORT CARSON 1676 EVANS STREET, BLDG 1220,

3RD FLOOR FORT CARSON, CO 80913-5198

(Insert Date)

SUBJECT: Offerer Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal

(RFP) W911 RZ-24-R-0004.

Dear Sir/Ma'am, The US Army Military Installation Command-Fort Carson is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 561730. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the MICC-Fort Carson, 1676 Evans Street, building 1220, 3rd floor, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or (insert date), whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to the Contracting Officer, Mrs. Mary L. Hudson at mary.l.hudson.civ@army.mil and the Contracting Speacialist, CPT Kyle W. Hensley at kyle.w.hensley2.mil@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the contracting speacilaist via email at kyle.w.hensley2.mil@army.mil.

Sincerely, Mary L.Hudson Contracting Officer

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104)

JAN 22 26

Past Performance Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer and Contracting Speacilist. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer and Contracting Speacalist identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

I A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104)

JAN 22 27

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .