Attachment 2 - PPQ.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT 2 RFP

SP0604-21-R-0402

Our firm is currently in the process of preparing a proposal for the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Energy Bulk Petroleum Supply Management Services effort, RFQ number SP0604-21-R-0402. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

This questionnaire is due to DLA Energy no later than Monday December 14, 2020, by 12:00 PM Eastern Time.

The questionnaire must be submitted directly via e-mail to CSTeam@dla.mil. The email subject line should be ATTN: PPQ, RFQ SP0604-21-R-0402, (Company Name).

If you will not be available for verification of this past performance evaluation December 14, 2020 through January 15, 2020, please designate an alternate POC for the DLA Contracting Officer to contact.

Thank you.

NAME OF OFFEROR:

Phone:

E-mail:

I. Current or Historical Contract Information

CONTRACT REFERENCED:

1. Contract or Identifying Number:

2. Contract Value:

3. Period of Performance:

4. Brief description of items provided:

mailto:CSTeam@dla.mil

DJV0022

Highlight

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:

Agency/Company:

Title: Phone:

e-mail:

Alternate POC name:

Alternate POC phone number:

Alternate POC e-mail address:

EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions –

The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

Past Performance

Evaluation Question 1.

Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Questions 2 . Timeliness

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Timeliness Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Comments, if any.

Question 3. Quality of Workload Management

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to manage workload, produce quality deliverables and coordinate with subcontractors ( if any) to meet requirements of the applicable performance work statement?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Quality of Management

Comments, if any.

Question 4. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments: