ATTACHMENT 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE RISK ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

Completed PPQs should be submitted directly from the client to the Government at TPSS mailbox: CEHNC-TPSS@usace.army.mil prior to the solicitation closing date. Rows can be expanded to add information; otherwise do not alter this form. No hand-written responses.

This section is to be completed by the Offeror prior to sending to Client for completion.

Solicitation Number W912DY -

Solicitation Closing

Date

Company/Agency Name

Point of Contact Name

Address

Email Address

Telephone Number

Date Sent to Client

Name of Person Sent To

This section to be completed by the Client ONLY.

Name of Person Completing Form

Title

Contract Title

Contract Number

Project Description

Contract Type/Cost

Award Date

Original Contract Price

Final Contract Price

Explain Difference

Percentage of Work Performed by

Contractor

Roles and Responsibilities as Sub or Prime mailto:CEHNC-TPSS@usace.army.mil

Expected Completion Date

Actual Completion Date

Explain Differences

1. Quality of Work:

a) How was the contractor’s compliance with applicable safety standards to protect personnel and company/agency resources?

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Excellent

b) How was the contractor’s compliance with applicable labor standards?

c) Was the contractor’s effort in Quality Control successful in ensuring quality workmanship on your project?

d) Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?

e) Overall rating for Quality of Work

2. Cost Controls:

a) Did the Contractor perform the required services at the contract price without adverse effect on performance?

b) Did the contractor submit a fair and reasonable proposal when requested to perform additional work?

c) If this contract is an indefinite delivery type contract (e.g., Multiple Award Environmental Contract, Task Order

Contract, etc.), has the Contractor submitted competitive quotes on the individual orders issued under this contract?

Yes No N/A

d) Overall rating for Cost Controls

3. Timeliness of Performance:

a) Was the contractor timely in submitting schedules, reports, billings and other contract submittals?

Always Usually Sometimes Never N/A

b) Was the contractor timely in responding to requests for proposals for additional work?

c) Did the contractor complete the contract on time taking into account all excusable delays?

d) Was the contractor assessed any liquidated damages or deductions for late or nonperformance of required work?

If yes, please explain.

Yes No

e) Did the contractor exceed contractual requirements in relation to Timeliness of Performance in a way that was deemed beneficial to your agency?

If you answered No, indicate your reason by checking one of the following:

Contractor met the requirements, but did not exceed them

Did not meet some of the requirements

Did not meet requirements and recovery is not likely

f) Overall rating for Timeliness of Performance

4. Effectiveness of Management:

a) Did the contractor award subcontracts in a timely manner and properly manage them?

b) If applicable, did the contractor meet its small, small disadvantaged and women-owned business participation goals?

c) How would you rate the management of this firm as it relates to the completion of your contract and to the qualifications of its on-site personnel. Please explain.

d) Describe the performance of the following personnel (if applicable)

1. Program Manger U M S VG E

2. Project Manager U M S VG E

3. Engineering/Technical U M S VG E

4. Quality Control Manager U M S VG E

5. Safety Officer U M S VG E

6. Superintendent U M S VG E

5. Customer Satisfaction:

a) Did the Contractor show reasonable and cooperative behavior and attention to customer satisfaction?

If you answered NO, please explain why:

6. Overall Rating of Contractor:

In summary, which of the following would you choose to best describe the overall quality of this firm’s past performance?

Unsatisfactory

Marginal

Satisfactory

Very Good

Excellent

The information in this Questionnaire may be verified by Personnel from the U.S. Army Engineering and Support

Center, Huntsville.