Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 287 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Southeast Right Whale Early Warning System (Solicitation - Amendment 0002) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1305M325Q0092
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for the Southeast Right Whale Early Warning System solicitation (1305M325Q0092) issued by the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The questionnaire provides a standardized evaluation framework for assessing contractor performance across five key areas: quality of service, schedule performance, cost control, management effectiveness, and overall recommendation for future work. The evaluation uses an adjectival rating scale ranging from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional, allowing references to provide nuanced feedback on a contractor's performance.
The solicitation seeks support services for a Southeast U.S. Early Warning System with a one-year base period and four potential one-year option periods. The procurement will be a Firm-Fixed Price purchase order, conducted under an unrestricted full and open competition approach. Potential vendors must submit questions about the requirement before 5:00 PM EDT on March 21, 2025, with complete submission details outlined in Section 2 of the Request for Quotation (RFQ). The full scope of services is detailed in the associated Statement of Work, which is referenced but not included in this specific document.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_1305M325Q0092_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_1305M325Q0092_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Required Provisions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1305M325Q0092 (EWS for North Atlantic Right Whales).pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Individual Subcontracting Plan Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work (1305M325Q0092).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3: PAST PERFORMACE
QUESTIONNAIRE SOLICITATION # 1305M325Q0092
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Contractor Being Evaluated:
Contract number:
Project Title:
Period of Performance:
Total Funded Value:
Past Performance Reference Name:
Reference role on the project:
Questionnaire Instructions: Please assess the contractor’s performance on the referenced contract using the following adjectival rating scale:
ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Source Selection Information
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE. Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
Rating:
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE. Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance.
Rating:
Comments:
3. COST CONTROL. Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.
Rating:
Comments:
5. MANAGEMENT. Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction. Check the appropriate rating box.
Rating:
Comments:
Source Selection Information
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with this contract or order's most significant requirements, I ___would ___would not recommend them for similar requirements in the future.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE SIGNATURE [note: digital signature is acceptable]:
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| Contractor Being Evaluated: |
| Contract number: |
| Project Title: |
| Period of Performance: |
| Total Funded Value: |
| Past Performance Reference Name: |
| Past Performance Reference role on the referenced project: |
| 2. SCHEDULE. Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance. |
| Text1: |
| Dropdown3: [[Select Rating Below]] |
| Text6: |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text7: |
| Dropdown1: [[Select Rating Below]] |
| Dropdown2: [[Select Rating Below]] |
| Dropdown4: [[Select Rating Below]] |
| Group4: Off |
| Text8: |
| Text9: |
| Text10: |
| Text11: |
| Text12: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .