Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

FA5606-24-Q-0005

Attachment #2, Past Performance Questionnaire

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) This acquisition is for Custodial Services at Geilenkirchen AB, Germany

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: Address:

Telephone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:

Contract Number*: Contract Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RATER INFORMATION:

Name of Rater:

Title:

Address:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:

Claudia Mans, claudia.mans.1.de@us.af.mil and Hermann Laub, hermann.laub.de@us.af.mil mailto:claudia.mans.1.de@us.af.mil mailto:hermann.laub.de@us.af.mil

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, V, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E V S M U N Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The Contractor: E V S M U N

1. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

3. Submitted reports on time and followed established performance schedules. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

4. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

5. Cooperated with customer personnel after award.

6. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

7. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain. EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

REMARKS/COMMENTS: