ATTACHMENT 2 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PDF 251 KB Posted

Attached to
Operation and Maintenance of Communication Center at USAG Humphreys and CP TANGO
Solicitation number
W91QVN22R0006
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for offerors responding to solicitation number W91QVN22R0006 for operation and maintenance of a communication center at USAG Humphreys and CP TANGO for the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command. The past performance questionnaire requests information about the offeror's relevant past contracts including contract identification, award and completion dates, total value, and performance ratings in areas such as compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness, cost controls, and customer satisfaction. Respondents are asked to provide candid ratings and rationales to support an evaluation of the offeror's past performance.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SEE FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104-4(c) Controlled Unclassified Information

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SEE FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104-4(c) Controlled Unclassified Information

APPENDIX D

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP)

W91QV22R0006

The 411th CSB is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate Offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the Offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 811310. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the Humphreys Contracting Division, 411th CSB, APO AP 96271-5590, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 17 Aug 2022, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil and hyekyong.yi6.ln@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to at hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil and hyekyong.yi6.ln@army.mil.

Sincerely, CHONG, HYON SUK

Contracting Officer mailto:hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil mailto:hyekyong.yi6.ln@army.mil mailto:hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil mailto:hyekyong.yi6.ln@army.mil

Controlled Unclassified Information

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SEE FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104-4(c)

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

(Questionnaire should include questions to access compliance with FAR 52.219-8 and FAR 52.219-9)

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does Hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil and Hyekyong.yi6.ln@army.mil . Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The Offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The Offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The Offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

The Offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. Contract Identification Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title Contract Number:

Contract Type:

mailto:Hyonsuk.chong1.ln@army.mil mailto:Hyekyong.yi6.ln@army.mil

Controlled Unclassified Information

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SEE FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104-4(c)

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the Contractor name cited above):

Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. Identification of Offeror’s Representative

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II EVALUATON (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

* Note: rationale is required for each response

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverable to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship Substantial Confidence ( ) Satisfactory Confidence ( ) Limited Confidence ( ) No Confidence ( ) Rationale:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors) Substantial Confidence ( ) Satisfactory Confidence ( ) Limited Confidence ( ) No Confidence ( ) Rationale:

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables Substantial Confidence ( ) Satisfactory Confidence ( ) Limited Confidence ( ) No Confidence ( ) Rationale:

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts only)

Controlled Unclassified Information

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SEE FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104-4(c)

Substantial Confidence ( ) Satisfactory Confidence ( ) Limited Confidence ( ) No Confidence ( ) Rationale:

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest Substantial Confidence ( ) Satisfactory Confidence ( ) Limited Confidence ( ) No Confidence ( ) Rationale:

F. General Comments (Provide any other relevant performance information) Comments:

G. Other Information Sources (Please provide the following information)

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name):

Telephone Number:

H. Respondent Identification (Please provide the following information)

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance

Controlled Unclassified Information

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SEE FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104-4(c)

APPENDIX D PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

2022-07-14T16:57:54+0900
CHONG.HYON SUK.1267212844

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .