Attachment 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PDF 255 KB Posted

Attached to
WEST COAST ISO CONTAINER PROCUREMENT SOLICITATION SPE602-25-R-0709
Solicitation number
SPE602-25-R-0709
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a DLA Energy contract (SPE602-25-R-0709) for Leased Bulk Fuel Containers/Chassis in the West Coast Region. The 10-page questionnaire is designed to comprehensively evaluate a contractor's performance across multiple dimensions, including schedule responsiveness, management of key personnel, quality of services, business relations, and overall contract execution.

The questionnaire contains 29 detailed questions requiring yes/no responses, with space for explanatory narratives. Key evaluation areas include the contractor's timeliness in service delivery, administrative functions, compliance with contract terms, personnel management, technical expertise, customer service, subcontract management, and overall performance. The form allows a reference to provide a nuanced assessment of the contractor's performance, with sections covering schedule adherence, personnel management, service quality, business relations, and a final recommendation on whether similar contracts would be awarded to the contractor in the future.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SPE602-25-R-0709

DLA Energy Leased Bulk Fuel Containers/Chassis

West Coast Region

OSP Page 40 of 53

Attachment 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Note: The past performance questionnaire consists of a total of ten (10) pages

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Offeror to complete blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information:

CONTRACTOR NAME: CCR CAGE CODE:

ADDRESS: CCR DUNs NUMBER:

PHONE NUMBER:

EMAIL ADDRESS:

POINT OF CONTACT: CONTACT PHONE NUMBER:

2. Work Performed as: ______ Prime Contractor ______ Sub Contractor ______ Join Venture ______ Other (Explain)

OSP Page 41 of 53

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone#):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Contract Type: _________ Firm Fixed Price __________ Cost Reimbursement _________ Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Contract Description:

OSP Page 42 of 53

Complexity of Work: ________ High ________ Med _________ Routine

How is this contract relevant to the requirement of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Reference to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the reference’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

OSP Page 43 of 53

The Government requests that the reference completes this Past Performance Questionnaire and submits it directly to the Government. Completed Questionnaire should be submitted to the following individual:

Name:

Email:

Fax:

Telephone

OSP Page 44 of 53

Attachment 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The following questions require you to circle whether the answer is “YES” or “NO”. If the question is not applicable, circle “N/A”. If the question is answered as “NO”, please provide an explanatory narrative. These narratives need not be lengthy, just descriptive. Space for narrative comments is included after each question and in the “Remarks” page of the survey. If more space is needed attach additional pages.

You do not need to write a narrative for any questions answered as “YES” unless the question requests you to provide an explanation.

SCHEDULE

01. Was the Contractor responsive and timely in providing the required services?

YES NO

N/A

02. Was the Contractor responsive and timely to administrative functions of the contract?

03. Was the Contractor responsive and timely responding to questions or correspondence?

OSP Page 45 of 53

04. Was the Contractor in compliance with contract terms and conditions? YES NO

05. Were any contract concessions/changes/terminations made due to the contractor’s failure to accurately plan? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

06. Did the Contractor appropriately prepare & train the personnel? YES NO

OSP Page 46 of 53

07. Did the Contractor effectively manage subordinates? YES NO

QUALITY OF SERVICES

08. Did the Contractor assimilate & accommodate changes in contractual requirements and/or priority effectively?

09. Did the Contractor exhibit knowledge of and comply with Government

(or other) regulations?

10. Did the Contractor demonstrate technical expertise in providing all contractual services?

OSP Page 47 of 53

11. Did the Contractor possess/utilize tools/equipment necessary to adequately provide the required services?

QUALITY OF SERVICES (CONTINUED)

12. Did the Contractor meet the standard for:

(a) Technical Performance? YES NO

N/A

(b) Administrative Performance? YES NO

N/A

(c) Safety & Health? YES NO

13. Has the Contractor ever failed to effectively control the quality of services provided? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

OSP Page 48 of 53

14. Has a Contract Discrepancy Report (or equivalent) ever been issued? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

15. Has a Cure Notice or Show Cause Letter ever been issued? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

16. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

17. Has the Contractor demonstrated the ability to correct any of the problems for questions 14 through 16? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

OSP Page 49 of 53

QUALITY OF SERVICES (CONTINUED)

18. Has the contract been terminated for default? YES NO

19. Has an election ever been made to not exercise an option due to the

Contractor’s poor performance? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

BUSINESS RELATIONS

20. Did the Contractor satisfactorily manage subcontracts? YES NO

OSP Page 50 of 53

21. Have there been any labor disputes? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

22. Have there been any violations of Public Law, especially the Service

Contract Act? (If you answered “YES”, please provide an explanation).

23. Did the Contractor consistently provide prompt and courteous service? YES NO

BUSINESS RELATIONS (CONTINUED)

24. Did the Contractor promptly and courteously resolve customer complaints?

OSP Page 51 of 53

25. Did the Contractor’s actions show an overall commitment to customer satisfaction?

26. Did the Contractor satisfactorily provide overall cooperation relative to this contract?

27. How would you rate the integration and coordination of all activity needed to perform this contract?

28. Did you feel that the Contractor’s overall performance was satisfactory? YES NO

OSP Page 52 of 53

29. Would you award similar contracts to this Contractor? YES NO

OSP Page 53 of 53

REMARKS:

Please use this space if you need more room than provided under the question. Label the remark with the applicable question number that it relates to.

Please list other known references regarding the Contractor’s performance:

TELEPHONE/

NAME ADDRESS FAX NUMBERS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .