Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
Pest Management Services at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska
Solicitation number
HT941026Q2055
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template from the Defense Health Agency (DHA), Healthcare Contracting Division-West (HCD-W), designed to evaluate contractor qualifications for pest management services at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska Military Treatment Facility. The solicitation number is HT941026Q2055. Respondents must complete the questionnaire and submit it to John Lam Ho and Karen Cusson to qualify for consideration. The contract covers a base period plus four option periods and requires contractors to demonstrate capability in providing pest management services at a military medical treatment facility.

The PPQ evaluates contractor past performance across four primary criteria: provision of pest management services in accordance with contract terms and conditions; employment of qualified and certified technicians; implementation of quality control and assurance procedures; and maintenance of records and documentation. Evaluation ratings use a five-point scale ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with a Not Applicable option. The questionnaire also requires government customers to indicate whether they would award future contracts to the firm, identify any contract terminations for default or cause, and provide additional comments. The template requests standard contract information including contract number, performance period, annual and total contract values, facility type, and contractor role (prime, subcontractor, teaming partner, or joint venture).

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Defense Health Agency Contracting Activity (DHACA) Healthcare Contracting Division-West (HCD-W) requests responses from qualified sources capable of providing the following: Pest Management Services (base + 4 option periods) for the Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson, Alaska Military Treatment Facility (MTF).

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the Contractor’s past performance and email to John Lam Ho (ho.j.lam.civ@health.mil) and Karen Cusson (karen.r.cusson.civ@health.mil).

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone:

Email:

OFFEROR’S REFERENCE INFORMATION:

Contractor Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

Telephone Number:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Contract Number:

Task Order Number:

Type of Contract:

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Description of Services:

MARKET SEGMENT

MAGNITUDE

Annual Contract Value:

Total Contract Dollar Value:

Facility Type:

Contractor performed on this contract as:

Prime
Subcontractor
Teaming Partner
Joint Venture

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Contractor’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

(E) Exceptional - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

Contractor Performance

Assess how the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provided pest management IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Ensured that qualified and certified technicians provided pest management services IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided quality control and assurance for pest management services.

Provided records and documentation for the provided pest management services.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Yes
No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default or cause:

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: ________________________________________

Title: ______________________________________________

Telephone: _________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .