Attachment 2 Past and Present Performance Survey RFQ 36C24121Q0493.pdf

PDF 343 KB Posted

Attached to
M1LZ--Parking Lot Valet Services - VA Providence HCS
Solicitation number
36C24121Q0493
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past and present performance survey for a federal contractor as well as details of a related federal contract opportunity for valet parking services. The past performance survey collects feedback on a contractor's performance on a previous contract through ratings on criteria such as correcting deficiencies, resolving discrepancies, cooperation with government personnel, and overall performance. The federal contract opportunity is a solicitation by the Department of Veterans Affairs for valet parking services at the VA Providence Healthcare System campus in Rhode Island. The services required include parking, delivering, and directing approximately 500 cars per day to and from designated parking areas, providing necessary supplies and signage, employing trained valet attendants, and making recommendations to optimize parking and traffic operations.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24121Q0493 0002.docx DOCX document
36C24121Q0493 0001.docx DOCX document
36C24121Q0493_3.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 P07 WD 2015-4083 Rev 15 04APR2021.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

36C24121Q0493

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE SURVEY

CONTRACT WORK DESCRIPTION:

CONTRACT # (if applicable) and Date of Award:

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose and circle the number on the scale of 1-6 that most accurately describes the contractor's performance or situation.

CODE/PERFORMANCE LEVEL

1 UNSATISFACTORY - Performance did not meet most contractual requirement. There were serious problems and the contractor's corrective actions were ineffective.

2 MARGINAL - Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

3 NONE - No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

4 SATISFACTORY - Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor was satisfactory.

5 VERY GOOD - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the Government's benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely effective manner.

6 EXCEPTIONAL – Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly efficient manner.

36C24121Q0493

The contractor: (1 being Very Bad and 6 being Very Good)

Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Suggested alternative approaches to problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Displayed initiative to solve problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Cooperated with Government personnel after award 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Rate the overall contractor’s performance under this contract. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in "remarks."

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Remarks

SIGNED _________________________________________________________ DATE______________________

Contractor provided adequate supervision. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .