Attachment 2 - Evaluation Criteria.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Upgrade and Replacement. Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
15A00024R00000087
Issued by
Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives

About this file

This document is the Evaluation Criteria for a federal contract opportunity. The opportunity is for a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Upgrade and Replacement, with a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) requirement. The evaluation will use a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) method, where only the lowest priced proposal will be reviewed for technical acceptability. The technical evaluation factors are Technical Capability and Past Performance, rated as Acceptable or Unacceptable. If more than one proposal is received, price reasonableness will be determined by competition. If only one proposal is received, the price will be evaluated for reasonableness. The solicitation number is 15A00024R00000087, with a response due date of 07/19/2024. The requirement is a competitive small business set-aside.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Upgrade and Replacement., newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 4 - PLC Upgrade Project Site Details.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 - Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 - Instructions.docx DOCX document
15A00024R00000087.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2 – EVALUATION CRITERIA

15A00024R00000087

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Only the lowest priced proposal will be reviewed for technical acceptability. If it’s found to be technically acceptable, award will be made to that offeror without further evaluation of the other proposals received. If the proposal is technically unacceptable, then the next lowest priced proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability until a technically acceptable proposal is found.

The Government will award a Purchase Order resulting from this solicitation to the offeror whose proposal is the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA). The following factors shall be used to evaluate technical acceptability of offers:

Non-Price Factors:

· Factor 1: Technical Capability

The Government will evaluate the Technical Acceptability of the proposal by verifying the offeror provided the following:

The offeror provided an organization structure, including the organizational chart and supporting narrative description of offeror’s proposed installation personnel, and any major subcontractor(s) and their key personnel assigned to performance of this project.

The proposal must demonstrate how the offeror will meet and perform every aspect of Section 4.0 in the SOW.

· Factor 2: Past Performance

The Government may seek relevant performance information on all responsive and otherwise Technically Acceptable Offerors through sources such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), or other government data bases and other sources that are available. The government shall not be limited in its search for performance data. The offeror shall not submit performance data for this factor. When performance is evaluated, the outcome is either Acceptable or Unacceptable. Unacceptable performance will disqualify an offeror from award.

Price Factor:

· Factor 3: Price

If more than one proposal is received, competition will determine price reasonableness and a price evaluation will not be completed.

If one proposal is received, price evaluation will proceed. The purpose of the price evaluation is to provide an assessment of the reasonableness of the submitted price in relation to the solicitation requirements.

Price will be evaluated based upon the following:

· Material – Will be compared to commercially available pricing.

· Labor – Will evaluate labor categories, hours, and rates to verify they match the complexity of the requirement and meet market value for similar labor rates.

· Travel – Will be evaluated based on market pricing and GSA rates.

The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

Only the lowest priced proposal will be reviewed for technical acceptability. If it’s found to be technically acceptable, award will be made to that offeror without further evaluation of the other proposals received. If the proposal is technically unacceptable, then the next lowest priced proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability until a technically acceptable proposal is found.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

EVALUATION PROCEDURES

Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating

Offeror’s Technical Capability and Past Performance will be rated using an Acceptable/Unacceptable rating system.

Technical Capability

Adjectival Rating
Description
Acceptable
Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable
Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Past Performance

Adjective
Definition / Description
Acceptable
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.
Unacceptable
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Price Analysis

If more than one proposal is received, competition will determine price reasonableness.

If only one proposal is received, the price evaluation is to provide an assessment of the reasonableness of the proposed price in relation to the solicitation requirements.

Price Evaluation: The total price will be evaluated by the Contracting Officer.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .