Attachment 2. PPQ.pdf
PDF 174 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8051-26-R-0005
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template used by federal contracting agencies to evaluate contractor performance on completed contracts. The form is designated as Source Selection Information under FAR 3.104 and is completed by the contracting agency, not the offeror.
Section 1 requires the offeror to provide contract identification details, including contractor name and CAGE code, role (prime, subcontractor, teaming partner, or joint venture partner), contract/BPA number, task/call/delivery order number, contract type (FFP, CPFF, ID/IQ, etc.), program title, period of performance, place of performance (CONUS, OCONUS, or both), total contract value including options, and whether a CPAR has been completed. The questionnaire emphasizes that each PPQ must address actual work performed on a specific performance effort (such as a single task order or call order) rather than overarching contracts like IDIQ basic contracts or BPAs.
Section 2 through 5 are completed by the contracting agency. Section 2 captures customer/agency identification and service descriptions. Section 3 identifies the evaluator and their years of experience on the subject contract. Section 4 contains the core evaluation questions assessing four performance areas: Quality of Product or Service, Schedule Performance, Business Relations, and Post-Delivery Support & Warranty. Evaluators rate performance using a six-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable) with mandatory narrative explanations for Exceptional, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory ratings. Section 5 requests a narrative summary addressing contract terminations (default, convenience, or pending) and evaluator reservations about future contractor performance. The completed questionnaire must be returned directly to the offeror, who is solely responsible for collecting and submitting it with their quotation package by the government's solicitation closing date.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 EOD Response Trailers SOW 20 May 2026.pdf | ||
| EOD Response Trailers SOW Redline Updates.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers 20 May 26.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1a. Trailer Fielding.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3. Pricing Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Combined Synopsis Solicitation FA8051-26-R-0005.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1. EOD Response Trailers SOW.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
**When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 3.104**
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR)
A. Contractor
B. Contractor Cage Code
C. Role (check): Prime Subcontractor Teaming Partner Joint Venture Partner Other (specify)
If subcontractor, partner or other, who is the Prime?
D. Contract/Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Number
Task/Call/Delivery/Purchase Order Number
Note: Each PPQ shall cover actual work performed and not overarching contracts, such as Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) basic contracts, Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA), etc. (i.e., each PPQ shall only address one performance effort such as a TO for an IDIQ contract, a call order off of a BPA, or delivery order).
E. Contract Type (FFP, CPFF, ID/IQ (include types), LH, etc.)__________________________________________
F. Program Title______________________________________________________________________________
G. Period of Performance
H. Place(s) of Performance:
Multiple locations? Yes No If yes, specify locations:
CONUS OCONUS Both
Provide details:
State Federal DoW Other Provide details:
I. Total Contract or Task/Call/Delivery/Purchase Order $ Value (including options)
J. Has a CPAR (or more than one CPAR) been completed for this contract? Yes No If Yes, provide dates covered by CPARs:
*****FOLLOWING SECTIONS COMPLETED BY CONTRACTING AGENCY*****
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or Agency Name
B. Customer or Agency Description
C. Description of Service(s) provided (Provide details on type of work, locations worked, and organizations serviced, to include Department of Defense, Government, or commercial work)
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Name _________________________________________ B. Title
C. Phone/Fax D. E-mail
E. Years worked on Subject Contract
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E EXCEPTIONAL - The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VG
VERY GOOD- The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or was satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score or item is not applicable to the referenced contract.
Please provide detailed narrative comments to support your ratings. At a minimum, please discuss each response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below (use additional sheets, if necessary).
Q1. Quality of Product or Service E VG S M U N/A
Ability of Contractor to: meet all technical and manufacturing specifications of the contract; deliver a product free from defects; and adhere to their proposed quality control plan.
Explanation:
Q2. Schedule Performance E VG S M U N/A
Ability of Contractor to: meet original and revised delivery schedules;
provide accurate production status updates; and coordinate effectively for final delivery and acceptance.
Q3. Business Relations E VG S M U N/A
Ability of Contractor to: maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel; manage, resolve problems and respond to and/or integrate approved engineering or production changes.
Q4. Post-Delivery Support & Warranty E VG S M U N/A
Ability of Contractor to: respond to post-delivery issues; honor warranty claims for defects in materials or workmanship; and provide effective technical or field support after acceptance.
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
A. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Place an “X” by all that apply.)
Yes No Default Convenience Pending Terminations
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
B. Would you have any reservations about having this Contractor perform again on one of your critical and demanding programs?
Evaluator’s Signature Date
UPON COMPLETION, PLEASE RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.
The Offeror (the company requesting this reference) is solely responsible for collecting this completed form and submitting it to the Government as part of their official quotation package.
Questionnaires must be received by the Offeror in time for them to meet the Government's solicitation closing date.
| A Contractor: |
| B Contractor Cage Code: |
| Prime: Off |
| Subcontractor: Off |
| Teaming Partner: Off |
| Joint Venture Partner: Off |
| If subcontractor partner or other who is the Prime: Off |
| Other specify: |
| D ContractBlanket Purchase Agreement BPA Number: |
| TaskCallDeliveryPurchase Order Number: |
| E Contract Type FFP CPFF IDIQ include types LH etc: |
| Program Title: |
| G Period of Performance: |
| H Places of Performance: |
| Multiple locations: Off |
| If yes specify locations: |
| CONUS: Off |
| OCONUS: Off |
| Both: Off |
| Provide details: |
| State: Off |
| Federal: Off |
| DoW: Off |
| Other: Off |
| Provide details_2: |
| I Total Contract or TaskCallDeliveryPurchase Order Value including options: |
| Has a CPAR or more than one CPAR been completed for this contract: Off |
| If Yes provide dates covered by CPARs: |
| A Customer or Agency Name: |
| B Customer or Agency Description: |
| serviced to include Department of Defense Government or commercial work 1: |
| serviced to include Department of Defense Government or commercial work 2: |
| serviced to include Department of Defense Government or commercial work 3: |
| serviced to include Department of Defense Government or commercial work 4: |
| serviced to include Department of Defense Government or commercial work 5: |
| A Name: |
| B Title: |
| C PhoneFax: |
| D Email: |
| E Years worked on Subject Contract: |
| Q1 Quality of Product or Service: |
| E_2: |
| undefined: |
| Explanation 1: |
| Explanation 2: |
| Explanation 3: |
| Q2 Schedule Performance: |
| E_3: |
| undefined_2: |
| Explanation 1_2: |
| Explanation 2_2: |
| Explanation 3_2: |
| Q3 Business Relations: |
| EAbility of Contractor to maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel manage resolve problems and respond to andor integrate approved engineering or production changes: |
| VGAbility of Contractor to maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel manage resolve problems and respond to andor integrate approved engineering or production changes: |
| SAbility of Contractor to maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel manage resolve problems and respond to andor integrate approved engineering or production changes: |
| MAbility of Contractor to maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel manage resolve problems and respond to andor integrate approved engineering or production changes: |
| UAbility of Contractor to maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel manage resolve problems and respond to andor integrate approved engineering or production changes: |
| NAAbility of Contractor to maintain effective relationship between key Contractor personnel and key Government personnel manage resolve problems and respond to andor integrate approved engineering or production changes: |
| undefined_3: |
| Explanation 1_3: |
| Explanation 2_3: |
| Explanation 3_3: |
| Q4 PostDelivery Support Warranty: |
| E_4: |
| undefined_4: |
| Explanation 1_4: |
| Explanation 2_4: |
| Explanation 3_4: |
| Yes_3: Off |
| No_3: Off |
| Default: Off |
| Convenience: Off |
| Pending Terminations: Off |
| If yes please explain eg inability to meet cost performance or delivery schedules etc 1: |
| If yes please explain eg inability to meet cost performance or delivery schedules etc 2: |
| If yes please explain eg inability to meet cost performance or delivery schedules etc 3: |
| If yes please explain eg inability to meet cost performance or delivery schedules etc 4: |
| If yes please explain eg inability to meet cost performance or delivery schedules etc 5: |
| demanding programs 1: |
| demanding programs 2: |
| demanding programs 3: |
| demanding programs 4: |
| demanding programs 5: |
| Date: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .